An Amplifying Cascade of Contact Lens-Related End-of-Day Hyperaemia and Dryness Symptoms

References

• Young G. Why one million contact lens wearers dropped out. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2004;27:83–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Willcox MDP, Bron AJ, Belmonte C, Ciolino JB, Craig JP, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Jones L, Nelson JD, et al.; TFOS Workshop members. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS7–TFOS13. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (Senofilcon A). Eye Cont Lens. 2006;32:281–86. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000224522.04723.7a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin MC, Svitova TF. Contact lens wettability in vitro: effect of surface-active ingredients. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87:440–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Zhao Z, Naduvilath T, Lazon de la Jara P. Cytokine changes in tears and relationship to contact lens discomfort. Mol Vis. 2015;21:293–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson W, Chauhan SK, Dana R. Dry eye disease: an immune-mediated ocular surface disorder. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:90–100. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Conjunctival tear layer temperature, evaporation, hyperosmolarity, inflammation, hyperaemia, tissue damage and symptoms: an amplifying cascade. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42:1574–84. doi:10.1080/02713683.2017.1377261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Willcox MDP. The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerant wearers. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2006;29:41–47. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2005.12.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagahara Y, Koh S, Maeda N, Nishida K, Watanabe H. Prominent decrease in tear meniscus height with contact lens wear and efficacy of eye drop instillation. Eye Cont Lens. 2015;41:318–22. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:194–204. doi:10.1097/00006324-200403000-00012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Dumbleton KA, Theodoratos P, Wong S, Patel K, Banks G, Patel T. Association between contact lens discomfort and pre-lens tear film kinetics. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:881–91. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C. Contact lens wear affects tear film evaporation. Eye Cont Lens. 2008;34:326–30. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31818c5d00.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svitova TF, Lin MC. Wettability conundrum: discrepancies of soft contact lens performance in vitro and in vivo. Eur Phys J Special Topics. 2011;197:295–303. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2011-01471-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Wang J, Shen M, Cai C, Li J, Cui L, Qu J, Lu F. Lower volumes of tear menisci in contact lens wearers with dry eye symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3159–63. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen P, Huang D, Li Y, Sadda S, Ramos S, Pappuru R, Yiu SC. Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived assessments of lower tear meniscus parameters and clinical features of dry eye disease. Cornea. 2012;31:680–85. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182261577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G, Chalmers R, Napier L, Kern J, Hunt C, Dumbleton K. Soft contact lens-related dryness with and without clinical signs. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1125–32. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182640af8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective discomfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:700–04. doi:10.1097/00006324-199910000-00021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versura P, Giannaccare G, Fresina M, Campos EC. Subjective discomfort symptoms are related to corneal temperature in patients with evaporative dry eye. Cornea. 2015;34:1079–85. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JH, Ng EYK, Acharya R. Evaluation of tear evaporation from ocular surface by functional infrared thermography. Med Phys. 2010;37:6022–34. doi:10.1118/1.3495540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida R, Kojima T, Dogru M, Kaido M, Matsumoto Y, Tanaka M, Goto E, Tsubota K. The application of a new continuous functional visual acuity measurement system in dry eye syndromes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:253–58. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda I, Fujishima H, Tsubota K. Ocular fatigue is the major symptoms of dry eye. Acta Ophthalmol. 1993;71:347–52. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb07146.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh S. Mechanisms of visual disturbance in dry eye. Cornea. 2016;35(Suppl):S83–S88. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaido M, Kawashima M, Ishida R, Tsubota K. Severe symptoms of short tear break-up time dry eye are associated with accommodative microfluctuations. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;Volume 11:861–69. doi:10.2147/OPTH.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, King-Smith PE. Thickness of the pre- and post-contact lens tear film measured in vivo by interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:68–77. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosaka E, Kawamorita T, Ogasawara Y, Nakayama N, Uozato H, Shimizu K, Dogru M, Tsubota K, Goto E. Interferometry in the evaluation of precorneal tear film thickness in dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Rohr M, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Cervino A. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2018;41:117–21. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorado LH, Alzahrani Y, Pritchard N, Efron N. Time course of changes in goblet cell density in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:2888–94. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasci YY, Gurdal C, Sarac O, Onusever A. Evaluation of the tear function tests and the ocular surface in first-time users of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42:976–81. doi:10.1080/02713683.2016.1276194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex J, Knowles T, Zhao X, Lemp J, Maissa C, Perry SS. Elemental composition at silicone hydrogel contact lens surfaces. Eye Cont Lens. 2018;0:1-6. Ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Arita R, Fukuoka S, Morishige N. Meibomian gland dysfunction and contact lens discomfort. Eye Cont Lens. 2017;43:17–22. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC. Perspective: anti-inflammatory therapy for dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:337–42. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, de Paiva CS, Li D-Q, Stern ME. Epithelial-immune cell interaction in dry eye. Cornea. 2008;27:S9–S11. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31817f4075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson MB. Code red: the key feature of hyperaemia. Rev Ophthalmol. 2010 April 22;1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy PJ, Lau JSC, Sim MML, Woods RL. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Eye. 2006;21:633–38. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW, Chapman-Davies A. Assessment of conjunctival hyperaemia in contact lens wearers; Part two: preserved versus unpreserved storage of soft lenses. AmJ Optom Physiol Optics. 1987;64:251–55. doi:10.1097/00006324-198704000-00004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen W, Xu Z, Jiang H, Zhou J, Wang L, Wang J. Altered bulbar conjunctival microcirculation in response to contact lens wear. Eye Cont Lens. 2017;43:95–99. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhers WH, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;8:445–49. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e32830e6af0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Willcox MDP, Argueso P, Maissa C, Stahl U, Tomlinson A, Wang J, Yokoi N, Stapleton F, and the members of  TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort. Report of the contact lens interactions with the tear film subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS123–156. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoudi S, Zhao Z, Stapleton F, Willcox M. Contact lens-induced discomfort and inflammatory mediator changes in tears. Eye Cont Lens. 2017;43:40–45. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Porta N, Rico-del-Viejo L, Martin-Gil A, Carracedo G, Pintor J, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Differences in dry eye questionnaire symptoms in two different modalities of contact lens wear: silicone-hydrogel in daily wear basis and overnight orthokeratology. BioMed Res Internat. 2016;Article ID 1242845. doi:http://dx.doi.org/101155/2016/1242845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura K, Mutsuhiro N, Matsubara K. Subjective symptom of eye dryness and lifestyle factors with corneal neovascularization in contact lens wearers. Eye Cont Lens. 2004;30:95–98. doi:10.1097/01.ICL.00000117256.77329.06.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillon M, Shah D. Objective measurement of contact lens-induced conjunctival redness. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:595–605. doi:10.1097/00006324-199609000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duench S, Simpson T, Jones LW, Flanagan JG, Fonn D. Assessment of variation in bulbar conunctival redness, temperature, and blood flow. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:511–16. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318073c304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grupcheva C, Marinova T, Grupchev D, Toshev R. The microstructural secrets off contact lens related conjunctival hyperaemia. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2015;38:e8. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2014.11.104.
   Google Scholar
• Shoji J, Inada N, Sawa M. Antibody array-generated cytokine profiles of tears of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis or giant papillary conjunctivitis. Jap J Ophthalmol. 2006;50:195–204. doi:10.1007/s10384-005-0319-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2002;25:137–46. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(02)00009-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belmonte C, Acosta MC, Gallar J. Neural basis of sensation in intact and injured corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:513–25. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal P, Baran I, Jacobs DS. Corneal pain without stain: is it real? The Ocul Surf. 2009;7:28–40. doi:10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70290-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantelli F, Micera A, Sachchetti M, Bonini S. Neurogenic inflammation of the ocular surface. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10:498–504. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833e16cc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan LL, Sanjay S, Morgan PB. Static and dynamic measurement of ocular surface temperature in dry eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2016;ID 7285132:1–11. doi:10.1155/2016/7285132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen IS. The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by evaporation from any water surface. Phys Rev. 1926;27:779–83. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.27.779.
   Google Scholar
• Purslow C, Wolffsohn JS, Santodomingo-Rubido J. The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2004.10.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMonnies CW, Korb DR, Blackie CA. The role of heat in rubbing and massage-related corneal deformation. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2012;35:148–54. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Singh I, Tomlinson A, Morgan PB, Efron N. The role of tear physiology in ocular surface temperature. Eye. 2000;14:635–41. doi:10.1038/eye.2000.156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, Djalilian A, Dogru M, Dumbleton K, Gupta PK, Karpecki P, Lazreg S, Pult H, et al. TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:539–74. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maissa C, Guillon M, Garafalo RJ. Contact lens-induced circumlimbal staining in silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis. Eye Cont Lens. 2012;38:16–26. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31823bad46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan J, Ehrmann K, Meadows D, Lally J, Holden B. Lens parameter changes under in vitro and ex vivo conditions and their effect on the conjunctiva. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2013;36:171–75. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varikooty J, Simpson TL. The interblink interval 1: the relationship between sensation intensity and tear film disruption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1087–92. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Begley CG, Situ P, Simpson T. A link between tear breakup and symptoms of ocular irritation. The Ocul Surf. 2017;15:696–703. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C. Bulbar conjunctival staining in contact lens wearers and non lens wearers and its association with symptomatology. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:67–73. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2005.02.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alzahrani Y, Colorado L, Pritchard N, Efron N. Inflammatory cell upregulation of the lid wiper in contact lens dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:917–24. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Psychological and other mechanisms for end-of-day soft lens symptoms. Optom Vis Science. 2013;90:e175–e181. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318292624b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barado-Navascues E, Rubido-Crespo M-J. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers. Eye Cont Lens. 2010;36:96–100. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181d1d5a5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. How contact lens comfort may be influenced by psychiatric and psychological conditions and mechanisms. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97:308–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MDP. Is there a role for inflammation in contact lens discomfort? Eye Cont Lens. 2017;43:5–16. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotnisky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:193–97. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2002.tb03034.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navascues-Cornago M, Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Effect of three interventions on contact lens comfort in symptomatic wearers: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2015;1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papas EB, Tilia D, Tomlinson D, Williams J, Chan E, Chan J, Golebiowsky B. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:24–31. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Yamada M. Tear evaporation from the ocular surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2942–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B, Faustina M. Eyelid temperature and tear osmolarity (ARVO abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Lee WB. Ocular surface disease: cornea, conjunctiva and tear film. New York: Saunders/Elsevier; 2013. p. 200. E-Book ISBN: 978-1-4557-5623-0.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl U, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Osmolality and tear film dynamics. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;95:3–11. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00634.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao C, Stapleton F, Willcox MDP, Golebioski B, Richdale K. Preinflammatory signs in established reusable and disposable contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94:1003–08. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier M-A, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:143–51. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000204513.76568.57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Lievens CW, Bloomenstein MR, Liu H, Simmons P, Vehige J. Ddual-polymer drops, contact lens comfort, and lid wiper epitheliopathy. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:979–86. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Wang J, Shen M, Cui L, Cai C, Li M, Li K, Lu F. Tear menisci and ocular discomfort during daily contact lens wear in symptomatic wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2175–80. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Wang J, Shen M, Cui L, Tao A, Chen Z, Ge L, Lu F. Effect of punctal occlusion on tear menisci in symptomatic contact lens wearers. Cornea. 2012;31:1014–22. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f8d9e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N. Contact lens wear is intrinsically inflammatory. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100:3–19. doi:10.1111/cxo.2017.100.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creuzot C, Passmard M, Viau S, Joffre C, Pouliquen P, Elena PP, Bron A, Brignole F. Amelioration de la symptomatology chez des patients atteints de secheresse oculaire et traits oralement par des acides gras polyinsatures. J Fran d’Ophthalmologie. 2006;29:868–873. doi:10.1016/S0181-5512(06)70106-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava R, Kumar P, Phogat H, Kaur A, Kumar M. Oral omega-3 fatty acid treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2015;38:206–10. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor CG, Narayanan S, Miller W. Reduction in inflammatory marker matrix metalloproteinase-9 following lid debridement with BlephEx (ARVO abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;8:498.
   Google Scholar
• Ambroziak AM, Szaflik J, Szaflik JP, Ambroziak M, Witkiewicz J, Skopinski P. Immunomodulation on the ocular surface: a review. Cent Europ J Immunol. 2016;2:195–208. doi:10.5114/ceji.2016.60995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao C, Richdale K, Jalbert I, Doung K, Gokhale M. Non-invasive objective and contemporary methods for measuring ocular surface inflammation in soft contact lens wearers – a review. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2017;40:273–82. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu F-S, Yin J, Xu K, Huang J. Growth factors and corneal epithelial wound healing. Brain Res Bull. 2010;81:229–35. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.08.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Saito J, Yanai R, Yamada N, Chikama T-I, Seki K, Nishida T. Cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions during corneal epithelial wound healing. Prog Ret Eye Res. 2003;22:113–33. doi:10.1016/S1350-9462(02)00042-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhivov A, Stave J, Vollmar B, Guthoff R. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of Langerhans cell density and distribution in the epithelium of healthy volunteers and contact lens wearers. Cornea. 2007;26:47–54. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802e3b55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzahrani Y, Colorado LH, Pritchard N, Efron N. Longitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density of the cornea and conjunctiva in contact lens-induced dry eye. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100:33–40. doi:10.1111/cxo.2017.100.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Hu L, Chen W, Qu D, Jiang H, Wang J. Evaluated conjunctival blood flow velocity in daily contact lens wearers. Eye Cont Lens. 2017;1. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan AS, Gurdal C, Arslan N. Corneal confocal microscopy and dry eye findings in contact lens discomfort patients. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2018;41:101–04. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawaheer L, Anijeet D, Ramaesh K. Diagnostic criteria for limbal cell deficiency-a systematic literature review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:522–32. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dua HS, Saini JS, Azuara-Blanco A, Gupta P. Limbal stem cell deficiency: concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Curr Ophthalmol. 2000;48:83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rama P, Matuska S, Paganoni G, Spinelli A, De Luca M, Pellegrini G. Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. New Eng J Med. 2010;363:147–55. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins C, Tufts S, Liu C, Buckley R. Limbal transplantation in the management of chronic contact lens-associated epitheliopathy. Eye. 1993;7:629–33. doi:10.1038/eye.1993.145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers R. Overview of factors that affect comfort and modern soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2014;37:65–76. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.08.154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar