Comparison of Keratometry Obtained by a Swept Source OCT-Based Biometer with a Standard Optical Biometer and Scheimpflug Imaging

References

• De Bernardo M, Zeppa L, Cennamo M, Iaccarino S, Zeppa L, Rosa N. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery in Caucasian patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24:494–500. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirnschall N, Gangwani V, Crnej A, Koshy J, Maurino V, Findl O. Correction of moderate corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery: toric intraocular lens versus peripheral corneal relaxing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:354–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland E, Lane S, Horn JD, Ernest P, Arleo R, Miller KM. The AcrySof Toric intraocular lens in subjects with cataracts and corneal astigmatism: a randomized, subject-masked, parallel-group, 1-year study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:2104–11. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day AC, Stevens JD. Predictors of femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy efficacy for astigmatism management in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:251–57. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Dong J, Wu Q. Comparison of anterior corneal curvature measurements using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug analyzer and Topcon auto Kerato-refractometer. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:140628. doi:10.1155/2014/140628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-A, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Evaluation of 2 new optical biometry devices and comparison with the current gold standard biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:513–17. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Avni I, Zadok D. Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:48–53. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.08.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symes RJ, Ursell PG. Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:295–301. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman A, Asena L, Güngör SG. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1201–05. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2224–32. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özyol P, Özyol E. Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based topography measurements of anterior segment parameters. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:73–78. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, Kiraly L. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Mar 22. [Epub ahead of print] 40:318–22. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asena L, Altinörs DD, Cezairlioglu S, Bölük SO. Effect of dry eye on Scheimpflug imaging of the cornea and elevation data. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;52(3):313–17. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:103–13. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(6):367–75. doi:10.1097/00006324-199706000-00019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(1):80–85. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00797-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whang WJ, Byun YS, Joo CK. Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40:425–32. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02777.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller A, Thomas BC, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP. Comparison of a new image-guided system versus partial coherence interferometry, Scheimpflug imaging, and optical low-coherence reflectometry devices: keratometry and repeatability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:672–78. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirayama M, Wang L, Weikert MP, Koch DD. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:528–535.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk A, Arıcı C, Ceylan OM, Kola M. Repeatability and comparison of keratometry values measured with potec PRK-6000 autorefractometer, IOLMaster, and pentacam. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014;44:179–83.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola-Villalobos P, Almendral-Gómez J, Garzón N, Ruiz-Medrano J, Fernández-Pérez C, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Eye (Lond). 2017 Mar;31(3):437–42. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Chen H, Lu W, Hu Q, et al. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;101(4):493–98. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1193–97. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodmass J, Rocha G. A comparison of Scheimpflug imaging simulated and Holladay equivalent keratometry values with partial coherence interferometry keratometry measurements in phakic eyes. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009;44:700–04. doi:10.3129/i09-172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orucoglu F, Akman M, Onal S. Analysis of age, refractive error and gender related changes of the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye with Scheimpflug imaging. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38:345–50. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar