Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

References

• Brandt JD. Corneal thickness in glaucoma screening, diagnosis, and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:85–89. doi:10.1097/00055735-200404000-00004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Colin J, Maurice-Tison S, Kerautret J. Screening of forme fustre keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2403–10. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hori-Komai Y, Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Tsubota K. Reasons for not performing refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:795–97. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01321-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:954–64. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Gonzalez-Perez J, Cervino A, Yebra-Pimentel E, Parafita MA. Changes in corneal structure with continuous wear of high-Dk soft contact lenses: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:440–46. doi:10.1097/00006324-200306000-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Perez J, González-Meijome JM, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Erickson P. Corneal epithelial thinning profile induced by long-term wear of hydrogel lenses. Cornea. 2003;22:304–07. doi:10.1097/00003226-200305000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:81–88. doi:10.1177/112067210501500113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and Scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:75–80. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD. The Ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714–20. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Melles R, Lin SC. The impact of central corneal thickness on the risk of glaucoma in a large multiethnic population. J Glaucoma. 2014;23:606–12. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367–408. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Pérez J, González-Méijome JM, Rodríguez Ares MT, Parafita MA. Central corneal thickness measured with three optical devices and ultrasound pachometry. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37:66–70. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31820c6ffc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Fink BA, King-Smith PE, Mitchell GL. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments. Cornea. 2011;30:1238–43. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182152051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio I, Rahhal SM, Alonso L, Palanca-Sanfrancisco JM, Sanchis-Gimeno JA. Corneal thickness values before and afteroxybuprocaine 0.4% eye drops. Cornea. 2003;22:527–32. doi:10.1097/00003226-200308000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Daneshvar R, Kargozar A, Derakhshan A, Daraei M. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymetry, rotating Scheimpflug camera, and scanning-slit topography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150:780–89. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178–81. doi:10.1126/science.1957169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC, Nassif N, Park BH, Yun SH, White BR, Bouma BE, Tearney GJ, de Boer JF. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: ultra high-speed, ultra high-resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1715–20. doi:10.1001/archopht.123.12.1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-García AO, Vizzeri G, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of RTVue retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc measurements and agreement with Stratus optical coherence tomography measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:1067–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani AH, Chen CL, Gahm JK, Zheng F, Richter GM, Rosenfeld PJ, Shi Y, Wang RK. Optical coherence tomography angiography: a comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;60:66–100. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Performance of Fourier-domain vs. time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2003;11:889–94. doi:10.1364/OE.11.000889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata LM, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, Aung HT, Gao H, Kumar RS, Foster PJ, Aung T. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:769–74. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doors M, Tahzib NG, Eggink FA, Berendschot TT, Webers CA, Nuijts RM. Use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography to study corneal changes after collagen cross-linking. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:844–51. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Wang J, Shen M, Cai C, Li J, Cui L, Qu J, Lu F. Lower volumes of tear menisci in contact lens wearers with dry eye symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3159–63. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Cai Y, Tan AC. Swept source optical coherence tomography angiography for contact lens-related corneal vascularization. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1–3. doi:10.1155/2016/9685297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh PV, Jha KN, Srikanth K. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound pachymetry. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:NC08–NC11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Ding X, Savini G, Pan C, Feng Y, Cheng D, Hua Y, Hu X, Wang Q. A comparison between scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1951–58. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol. 2008;28:333–38. doi:10.1007/s10792-007-9143-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken-Dror G, Avni I,Zadok D. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1729–35. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura F, Kamiya K, Fujiwara K, Shoji N, Shimizu K. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements using a NT-530P noncontact tono/pachymeter and correlation of central corneal thickness with intraocular pressure. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–5. doi:10.1155/2013/370592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit R, Vega JA, Fonn D, Simpson T. Diurnal variation of corneal sensitivity and thickness. Cornea. 2003;22:205–09. doi:10.1097/00003226-200304000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–28. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho T, Cheng AC, Rao SK, Lau S, Leung CK, Lam DS. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1177–82. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1701–07. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Al-Obeidan S, Al-Jubair KM. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry in post-LASIK eyes for myopia. Eur J Ophthal. 2010;20:852–57. doi:10.1177/112067211002000507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai LY, Khaw KW, Ng CM, Subrayan V. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Cornea. 2013;32:766–1. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318269938d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao HL, Kumar AU, Kumar A, Chary S, Senthil S, Vaddavalli PK, Garudadri CS. Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects. Cornea. 2011;30:121–26. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e16c65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Comparison of high-resolution Scheimpflug and high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy to anterior-segment OCT corneal thickness measurements. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:2239–47. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S53718.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Northey LC, Gifford P, Boneham GC. Comparison of Topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1708–14. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182775c8c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YG, Kim JH, Kim NR, Kim CY, Lee ES. Comparison between Tonopachy and other tonometric and pachymetric devices. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:843–49. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821896f1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomoriello DS, Lombardo M, Tranchina L, Oddone F, Serrao S, Ducoli P. Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:429–34. doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1550-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Resua C, Blanco A, Miñones M, Yebra-Pimentel E, Jesus Giraldez M. Accuracy and repeatability of a new tono-pachymeter for measuring central corneal thickness. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38:158–63. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31824b005b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagdik HM, Aktas S, Tetikoglu M, Ozcura F. Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry, with a new optical biometry and tono-pachymetry. Med Sci. 2017;6:22–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez- Meijome JM, Cervino A, Yebra-Pimentel E, Parafita MA. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:125–32. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01815-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth G, Tsorbatzoglou A, Kertesz K, Vajas A, Berta A, Modis L Jr. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:460–63. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:892–99. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000180817.46312.0a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayhan HA, Aslan Bayhan S, Can I. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7:302–08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoughi MM, Einollahi B, Einollahi N, Rezaei J, Roshandel D, Feizi S. Measurement of central corneal thickness using ultrasound pachymetry and orbscan II in normal eyes. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015;10:4–9. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.156084.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calvo-Sanz JA, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Sánchez-Tena MA. Accuracy of cirrus HD-OCT and topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness. J Optom. 2017;18: S1888-4296(17)30002-X. doi:10.1016/j.optom.
   Google Scholar
• Brown BW Jr., Lucero RJ, Foss AB. A situation where the Pearson correlation coefficient leads to erroneous assessment of reliability. J Clin Psychol. 1962;18:95–97. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar