Advanced search
Publication Cover
Current Eye Research Volume 46, 2021 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
73
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Visual Function and Imaging

Similar Dependence of Acuity Measures on Exposure Duration Irrespective of Acuity Level in Artificially Degraded Vision

Sven P. Heinricha Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;b Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4906-3937View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 595-598 | Received 27 Mar 2020, Accepted 31 Jul 2020, Published online: 17 Aug 2020

References

  • Costa M, Simone A, Vignali V, Lantieri C, Palena N. Fixation distance and fixation duration to vertical road signs. Appl Ergon. 2018;69:48–57. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.017.
  • Graham CH, Cook C. Visual acuity as a function of intensity and exposure-time. The American Journal of Psychology. 1937;49(4):654–61. doi:10.2307/1416390.
  • Monjé M, Schober H. Vergleichende Untersuchungen an Sehproben für die Fernvisusbestimmungen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1950;117:561–70.
  • Zanen J, Klaassen-Nenquin E. Acuité visuelle en fonction du temps d’exposition. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1957;114:574–81.
  • Schwarz F. Der Einfluß der Darbietungszeit auf die Erkennbarkeit von Sehproben. Pflügers Arch. 1947;249(4):354–60. doi:10.1007/BF00371657.
  • Barlow HB. Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. J Physiol (Lond). 1958;141(2):337–50. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005978.
  • Kono M, Yamade S. Temporal integration in diseased eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 1996-1997;20:231–39.
  • Heinrich SP, Krüger K, Bach M. The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248:389–94. doi:10.1007/s00417-009-1268-2.
  • Gerbstädt U. Der Einfluß der Sehprobengröße auf die minimale Darbietungszeit. Pflüger’s Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere. 1949;251(5):559–70. doi:10.1007/BF00362755.
  • Montés-Micó R. Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1631–35. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.019.
  • Stark L, Campbell FW, Atwood J. Pupil unrest: an example of noise in a biological servomechanism. Nature. 1958;182(4639):857–58. doi:10.1038/182857a0.
  • Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(2):153–64. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01031.x.
  • Hamilton R, Bach M, Heinrich SP, Hoffmann MB, Odom JV, McCulloch DL,Thompson DA. VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review. Doc Ophthalmol. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3.
  • Hamilton R, Bach M, Heinrich SP, Hoffmann MB, Odom JV, McCulloch DL, Thompson DA. ISCEV extended protocol for VEP methods of estimation of visual acuity. Doc Ophthalmol. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10633-020-09780-1.
  • Heinrich SP, Marhöfer D, Bach M. “Cognitive” visual acuity estimation based on the event-related potential P300 component. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(9):1464–72. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.030.
  • Heinrich SP, Lüth I, Bach M. Event-related potentials allow for optotype-based objective acuity estimation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(4):2184–91. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-16228.
  • Bach M. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test–automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:49–53. doi:10.1097/00006324-199601000-00008.
  • Lieberman HR, Pentland AP. Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: the Best PEST. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation. 1982;14(1):21–25. doi:10.3758/BF03202110.
  • Heinrich SP, Strübin I. Use of diffusing filters for artificially reducing visual acuity when testing equipment and procedures. Doc Ophthalmol. 2020;140(1):83–93. doi:10.1007/s10633-019-09715-5.
  • Strasburger H, Bach M, Heinrich SP. Blur unblurred—a mini tutorial. i-Perception. 2018;9(2):2041669518765850. doi:10.1177/2041669518765850.
  • Ang A. Predicting scatter of light shaping diffuser® angles using Luminit’s proprietary optical model and OpticStudio. Luminit LLC; n.d.
  • Good PI. Resampling methods: a practical guide to data analysis. Birkhäuser; 2005.
  • Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1763–68. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
  • Bach M. The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test—variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;245(7):965–71. doi:10.1007/s00417-006-0474-4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.