Corneal Biomechanics Assessment with Ultra High Speed Scheimpflug Camera in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Compared with Healthy Subjects: A meta-analysis of the Literature

References

• Kwon YH, Fingert JH, Kuehn MH, Alward WLM. Primary open-angle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1113–1124. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0804630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13762. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami H. Causal inference in primary open angle glaucoma: specific discussion on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(4):283–289. doi:10.1080/09286580600681339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK, Wilson MR, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714–720. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Aihara M, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(5):805–813. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00484-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Chen PP. Central corneal pachymetry and visual field progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(11):2126–2132. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(2):131–137. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01886-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Suh JKF, Hart RT. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24(1):39–73. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, McNally S, Kilpatrick JI, Jarvis SP, O’Brien CJ. Aging and ocular tissue stiffness in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018;63(1):56–74. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorhees AP, Ho LC, Jan NJ, Tran H, van der Merwe Y, Chan K, Sigal IA. Whole-globe biomechanics using high-field MRI. Exp Eye Res. 2017;160:85–95. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2017.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KM, Kim TW, Lee EJ, Girard MJA, Mari JM, Weinreb RN. Association of corneal hysteresis with lamina cribrosa curvature in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(13):4171–4177. doi:10.1167/iovs.19-27087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Zhang R, He LY. Corneal hysteresis and glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(8):1909–1916. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-1011-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, Garra C, Maurice-Tison S, Saubusse E, Colin J. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(4):616–622. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussnain SA, Alsberge JB, Ehrlich JR, Shimmyo M, Radcliffe NM. Change in corneal hysteresis over time in normal, glaucomatous and diabetic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(8):e627-630–e630. doi:10.1111/aos.12726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deol M, Taylor DA, Radcliffe NM. Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(2):96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868–875. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Meira-Freitas D, Lisboa R, Kuang TM, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1533–1540. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European glaucoma society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 4th edition - chapter 2: classification and terminology supported by the EGS foundation: part 1: foreword; introduction; glossary; chapter 2 classification and terminology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):73–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MMG, Sterne JAC, Bossuyt PMM. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Chang RT, Wong IYH, Lai JSM, Lee JWY, Singh K. Novel parameter of corneal biomechanics that differentiate normals from glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(6):e603-609–e609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Du S, Zhang X. Corneal deformation response in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and in healthy subjects analyzed by CorVis ST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(9):5557–5565. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian L, Wang D, Wu Y, Meng X, Chen B, Ge M, Huang Y. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(5):e317-324–e324. doi:10.1111/aos.12672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan ZS, Deshmukh S, Dixit S, Sreenivasaiah S, Shroff S, Devi S, Webers CAB, Rao HL. A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy controls using Corvis ST. PLOS One. 2020;15(10):e0241296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Rehman S, Vallabh NA, Batterbury M, Czanner G, Choudhary A, Cheeseman R, Elsheikh A, Willoughby CE. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(1):121–126. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coste V, Schweitzer C, Paya C, Touboul D, Korobelnik JF. Évaluation des propriétés biomécaniques de la cornée de patients glaucomateux et témoins par la technologie dynamique Scheimpflug de visualisation cornéenne. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2015;38(6):504–513. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2015.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Felletti M, Grasso L, Brusini P. Corneal deformation parameters provided by the CorVis-ST pachy-tonometer in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(8):568–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):862–869. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KE, Congdon NG. Corneal structure and biomechanics: impact on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(4):338–343. doi:10.1097/01.icu.0000233951.01971.5b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. Glaucoma: macrocosm to microcosm the Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(8):2662–2670. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell IC, Coudrillier B, Ross Ethier C. Biomechanics of the posterior eye: a critical role in health and disease. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(2):021005. doi:10.1115/1.4026286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acott TS, Kelley MJ. Extracellular matrix in the trabecular meshwork. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86(4):543–561. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2008.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ. Morphology of the aqueous outflow pathway. Microsc Res Tech. 1996;33(4):336–367. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19960301)33:4<336::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-N.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Last JA, Pan T, Ding Y, Reilly CM, Keller K, Acott TS, Fautsch MP, Murphy CJ, Russell P. Elastic modulus determination of normal and glaucomatous human trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(5):2147–2152. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar-Vidales T, Roque R, Clark AF, Wordinger RJ. Tissue transglutaminase expression and activity in normal and glaucomatous human trabecular meshwork cells and tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(2):622–628. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunathan V. Biomechanical properties of the trabecular meshwork in aqueous humor outflow resistance. In: Pallikaris I, Tsilimbaris MK, Dastiridou AI, editors. Ocular rigidity, biomechanics and hydrodynamics of the eye. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021. p. 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. PhD corneal hysteresis and beyond: does it involve the sclera? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(4):427–429. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth G, Hassan Z, Csutak A, Szalai E, Berta A, Modis L. Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(8):558–563. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130719-06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian L, Huang YF, Wang LQ, Bai H, Wang Q, Jiang JJ, Wu Y, Gao M. Corneal biomechanical assessment using corneal visualization scheimpflug technology in keratoconic and normal eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:147516. doi:10.1155/2014/147516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali NQ, Patel DV, McGhee CNJ. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(6):3651–3659. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):840–849.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Rama P. Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86(5):783–790. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2008.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kida T, Liu JHK, Weinreb RN. Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):567–572. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rico C, Gutiérrez-Ortíz C, González-Mesa A, Zandueta AM, Moreno-Salgueiro A, Germain F. Effect of diabetes mellitus on Corvis ST measurement process. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(3):e193–198–e198. doi:10.1111/aos.12530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes BT, Bao FJun, Wang JJie, Liu XYu, Wang L, Abass A, Eliasy A, Elsheikh A. Review of in-vivo characterisation of corneal biomechanics. Med Novel Technol Device. 2021;11:100073. doi:10.1016/j.medntd.2021.100073.
   Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Park HYL, Oh S, Park CK. Corneal biomechanical responses detected using CorVis corvis st in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. Medicine (Baltimore).2020;99(7):e19126. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000019126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong K, Wong IYH, Singh K, Chang RT. Corneal biomechanics using a scheimpflug-based noncontact device in normal-tension glaucoma and healthy controls. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2019;8(1):22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Guo Y, Cao K, Zhang Y, Xie Y, Pang R, Shi Y, Wang H, Wang N. Relationship between corneal stiffness parameters and lamina cribrosa curvature in normal tension glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;31(6):3049–3056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuura M, Hirasawa K, Murata H, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. The usefulness of CorvisST tonometry and the ocular response analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):40798. doi:10.1038/srep40798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Chun H, Moon JI. Corneal deflection amplitude and visual field progression in primary open-angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Park HYL, Park CK. Association between corneal deformation amplitude and posterior pole profiles in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):959–964. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qassim A, Mullany S, Abedi F, Marshall H, Hassall MM, Kolovos A, Knight LSW, Nguyen T, Awadalla MS, Chappell A, et al. Corneal stiffness parameters are predictive of structural and functional progression in glaucoma suspect eyes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(7):993–1004. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Moroi SE, Roberts CJ. Non-invasive clinical measurement of ocular rigidity and comparison to biomechanical and morphological parameters in glaucomatous and healthy subjects. Front Med. 2021;8:701997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, Lopes BT, Abass A, Vinciguerra P, Ambrósio R, Jr, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: stress-strain index. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Eliasy A, Lopes B, Abass A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Ambrósio R Jr, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A. Stress-strain index map: a new way to represent corneal material stiffness. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:640434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Chen Y, Yu X, Li M, Wen W, Sun X. Changes in corneal biomechanical properties after long-term topical prostaglandin therapy. PLOS One. 2016;11(5):e0155527. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar