A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma

References

• Kim JW, Lindsey JD, Wang N, Weinreb RN. Increased human scleral permeability with prostaglandin exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42(7):1514–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda N, Miyai T, Nejima R, Miyata K, Mimura T, Usui T, Aihara M, Araie M, Amano S. Effect of latanoprost on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 on the ocular surface. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010; 128(4):466–471. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopilly Park H-Y, Kim JH, Lee KM, Park CK. Effect of prostaglandin analogues on tear proteomics and expression of cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases in the conjunctiva and cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2012; 94(1):13–21. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2011.10.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Chen Y, Yu X, Li M, Wen W, Sun X. Changes in corneal biomechanical properties after long-term topical prostaglandin therapy. PloS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155527. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meda R, Wang Q, Paoloni D, Harasymowycz P, Brunette I. The impact of chronic use of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101(2):120–125. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano S, Nejima R, Inoue K, Miyata K. Effect of topical prostaglandins on the biomechanics and shape of the cornea. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 257(10):2213–2219. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04435-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(1):146–155. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palko JR, Liu J. Definitions and concepts. In Roberts CJ, Liu J (Ed). Corneal biomechanics: from theory to practice. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40(6):862–869. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogola A, Jan N-J, Brazile B, Lam P, Lathrop KL, Chan KC, Sigal IA. Spatial patterns and age-related changes of the collagen crimp in the human cornea and sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59(7):2987–2998. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M, Rama P, Campanelli M, Pye D. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res. 2007; 32(1):11–19. doi:10.1080/02713680601077145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Rama P. Biomechanical properties of human and porcine corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2008; 86(5):783–790. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2008.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salouti R, Alishiri AA, Gharebaghi R, Naderi M, Jadidi K, Shojaei-Baghini A, Talebnejad M, Nasiri Z, Hosseini S, Heidary F. Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in healthy children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11(8):1330–1336. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.08.13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, Deng SX, Cui X, Yu X, Sun X. A new tonometer—the Corvis ST Tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(1):659. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YMA. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure. J Biomech. 2008; 41(8):1707–1713. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons JP, Hossain A, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Ambrósio R. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff-induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2017; 33(4):266–273. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20161221-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih CY, Graff Zivin JS, Trokel SL, Tsai JC. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122(9):1270–1275. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.9.1270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krueger RR, Ramos-Esteban JC. How might corneal elasticity help us understand diabetes and intraocular pressure? J Refract Surg. 2007; 23(1):85–88. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20070101-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn BJ, Jenkins MW, Rollins AM, Dupps WJ. A review of structural and biomechanical changes in the cornea in aging, disease, and photochemical crosslinking. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019; 7:66. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenwald JS. Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry*. Am J Ophthalmol. 1937; 20(10):985–1024. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(37)90425-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kotliar K, Maier M, Bauer S, Feucht N, Lohmann C, Lanzl I. Effect of intravitreal injections and volume changes on intraocular pressure: clinical results and biomechanical model. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(7):777–781. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00939.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meek KM, Blamires T, Elliott GF, Gyi TJ, Nave C. The organisation of collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: a synchrotron X-ray diffraction study. Curr Eye Res. 1987; 6(7):841–846. doi:10.3109/02713688709034853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Corneal effects of prostaglandins (Basic Science). Int Glaucoma Rev. 2019;20–1:22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(1):156–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimprich L, Diedrich J, Bleeker A, Schweitzer JA. Corneal hysteresis as a biomarker of glaucoma: current insights. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14:2255–2264. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S236114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BA, Reilly MA, Roberts CJ. Biomechanical contribution of the sclera to dynamic corneal response in air-puff induced deformation in human donor eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2020;191:107904. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2019.107904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki A, Yasukura Y, Weinreb RN, Maeda N, Yamada T, Koh S, Asai T, Ikuno Y, Nishida K. Dynamic Scheimpflug ocular biomechanical parameters in untreated primary open angle glaucoma eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020; 61(4):19. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.4.19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Ambrósio R, Kang DSY, Lopes BT, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg. 2016; 32(8):550–561. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160524-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huseynova T, Waring GO, Roberts C, Krueger RR, Tomita M. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 157(4):885–893. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolívar G, Sánchez-Barahona C, Teus M, Castejón MA, Paz-Moreno-Arrones J, Gutiérrez-Ortiz C, Mikropoulos DG. Effect of topical prostaglandin analogues on corneal hysteresis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93(6):e495–e498. doi:10.1111/aos.12689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Barahona C, Bolívar G, Katsanos A, Teus MA. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97(8):e1112–e1115. doi:10.1111/aos.14170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Assessing PG effects on IOP (Medical Treatment). Int Glaucoma Rev. 2020;20(4):61–62.
   Google Scholar
• Scott JA, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Jain SG. Evaluating the relationship of intraocular pressure and anterior chamber volume with use of prostaglandin analogues. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(5):421–427. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal DR, Ehrlich JR, Shimmyo M, Radcliffe NM. The relationship between corneal hysteresis and the magnitude of intraocular pressure reduction with topical prostaglandin therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96(2):254–257. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.196899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsikripis P, Papaconstantinou D, Koutsandrea C, Apostolopoulos M, Georgalas I. The effect of prostaglandin analogs on the biomechanical properties and central thickness of the cornea of patients with open-angle glaucoma: a 3-year study on 108 eyes. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013; 7:1149–1156. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S50622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng XB, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Cao S, Zhu R, Huang W, Yu A, Huang JH, Wang QM, Wang JJ, et al. Experimental evaluation of travoprost-induced changes in biomechanical behavior of ex-vivo rabbit corneas. Curr Eye Res. 2019; 44(1):19–24. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1516781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaconita V, Quinn M, Jamal D, Dishan B, Malvankar-Mehta MS, Hutnik C. Washout duration of prostaglandin analogues: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:3190684–3190688. doi:10.1155/2018/3190684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood M, Brandt J. Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 45:S361–S368. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(01)00219-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm A, Stjernschantz J. Effects on intraocular pressure and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost applied once daily, evening or morning. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102(12):1743–1752. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30798-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellman RL, Sullivan EK, Ratliff M, Silver LH, Whitson JT, Turner FD, Weiner AL, Davis AA. Comparison of travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% with timolol 0.5% in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(5):998–1008. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01010-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasy A, Chen K-J, Vinciguerra R, Lopes BT, Abass A, Vinciguerra P, Ambrósio R, Jr. Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: stress-strain index. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:105. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar