Corneal Biomechanics Losses Caused by Refractive Surgery

References

• Wolle MA, Randleman JB, Woodward MA. Complications of refractive surgery: Ectasia after refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2016;56(2):127–139. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salomao MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Gomes Esporcatte LP, Correa FF, Lopes B, Sena N, Jr., Dawson DG, Ambrosio R. Jr. Ectatic diseases. Exp Eye Res. 2021;202:108347. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2020.108347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R. Jr. Post-LASIK Ectasia: twenty years of a Conundrum. Semin Ophthalmol. 2019;34:66–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DG, Randleman JB, Grossniklaus HE, O’Brien TP, Dubovy SR, Schmack I, Stulting RD, Edelhauser HF. Corneal ectasia after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: histopathology, ultrastructure, and pathophysiology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2181–2191 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(1):37–50. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin SX, Dackowski E, Chuck RS. Risk factors for postlaser refractive surgery corneal ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31(4):288–292. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR. Percent tissue altered and corneal ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27(4):311–315. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmanson JP, Horne J, Doughty MJ, Garcia M, Gondo M. Assessment of the number of lamellae in the central region of the normal human corneal stroma at the resolution of the transmission electron microscope. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(6):281–287. doi:10.1097/01.icl.0000165280.94927.0d.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toshino A, Uno T, Ohashi Y, Maeda N, Oshika T. Transient keratectasia caused by intraocular pressure elevation after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):202–204. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Nieto JC, Lopez-Miguel A. Characterization of corneal structure in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(12):2167–2183. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucakhan OO, Cetinkor V, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(6):1116–1124. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda N, Klyce S, Smolek M. Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(7):870–874. doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070044023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, Doveh E, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, Krueger RR, Colin J. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(2):237–246 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Munir SZ, Sami Karim SA, Munir WM. A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus. Eye. 2021;35(1):173–187. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1039-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokul A, Vellara HR, Patel DV. Advanced anterior segment imaging in keratoconus: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(2):122–132. doi:10.1111/ceo.13108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay E, Ozalp O, Yildirim N. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021; 13:25158414211012796. doi:10.1177/25158414211012796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrosio R, Jr., Guell JL, Malecaze F, Nishida K, Sangwan VS. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359–369. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao F, Geraghty B, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. Consideration of corneal biomechanics in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus: is it important? Eye Vis. 2016; 3:18. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0048-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kling S, Hafezi F. Corneal biomechanics – a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(3):240–252. doi:10.1111/opo.12345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Alcon N. In vivo characterization of corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:870–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong J, Dupps WJ. Jr. Corneal biomechanics: measurement and structural correlations. Exp Eye Res. 2021;205:108508. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2021.108508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Marshall J. A review of corneal biomechanics: mechanisms for measurement and the implications for refractive surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):2679–2690. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2146_20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler TG, Shao P, Eltony A, Seiler T, Yun SH. Brillouin spectroscopy of normal and keratoconus corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 202:118–125. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair A, Singh M, Aglyamov SR, Larin KV. Heartbeat OCE: corneal biomechanical response to simulated heartbeat pulsation measured by optical coherence elastography. J Biomed Opt. 2020;25(5):1–9. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.25.5.055001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok S, Clayson K, Hazen N, Pan X, Ma Y, Hendershot AJ, Liu J. Heartbeat-induced corneal axial displacement and strain measured by high frequency ultrasound elastography in human volunteers. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(13):33. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.13.33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavlatos E, Chen H, Clayson K, Pan X, Liu J. Imaging corneal biomechanical responses to ocular pulse using high-frequency ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37(2):663–670. doi:10.1109/TMI.2017.2775146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ. Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):862–869. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3026–3031. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan KM, Roy AS, Ambrosio R, Jr., Salomao M, Dupps WJ. Jr. Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(2):459–468. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O’Malley D, O’Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: findings using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(5):334–337. doi:10.1159/000145333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrosio R, Jr Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(1):13–16. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492011000100003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Ambrosio R, Jr., Heidari HR, Maddah N, Danesh Z, Sabzi F. Diagnostic ability of corneal shape and biomechanical parameters for detecting Frank Keratoconus. Cornea. 2018;37(8):1025–1034. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons JP, Hossain A, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Ambrosio R. Jr. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff-induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic scheimpflug analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(4):266–273. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20161221-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Xu L, Fan Q, Zhao D, Ren S. Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):10. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51502-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Shen Y, Yan Z, Tian M, Zhao J, Zhou X. Relationship among corneal stiffness, thickness, and biomechanical parameters measured by Corvis ST, Pentacam and ORA in keratoconus. Front Physiol. 2019;10:740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herber R, Ramm L, Spoerl E, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE, Terai N. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(6):778–788. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leao E, Ing Ren T, Lyra JM, Machado A, Koprowski R, Lopes B, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, et al. Corneal deformation amplitude analysis for keratoconus detection through compensation for intraocular pressure and integration with horizontal thickness profile. Comput Biol Med. 2019;109:263–271. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Ambrosio R, Jr., Kang DS, Lopes BT, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(8):550–561. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160524-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TC, Wang YM, Yu M, Jhanji V. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(1):42–47. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803–810. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Hafezi F, Yong Kang DS, Kermani O, Koh S, Lu N, Padmanabhan P, Roberts CJ, et al. Detection of postlaser vision correction ectasia with a new combined biomechanical index. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(10):1314–1318. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R, Jr., Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomao MQ, Buhren J, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–443. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellara HR, Patel DV. Biomechanical properties of the Keratoconic cornea: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(1):31–38. doi:10.1111/cxo.12211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhang F, Li Y, Song Y, Wang Z. Early diagnosis of keratoconus in chinese myopic eyes by combining Corvis ST with Pentacam. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(2):118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren S, Xu L, Fan Q, Gu Y, Yang K. Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84370-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Nuijts RM, Srivatsa P, Jayadev C, Pahuja N, Akkali MC, Sinha Roy A. Understanding the correlation between tomographic and biomechanical severity of Keratoconic Corneas. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–9. doi:10.1155/2015/294197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh S, Inoue R, Ambrosio R, Jr., Maeda N, Miki A, Nishida K. Correlation between corneal biomechanical indices and the severity of keratoconus. Cornea. 2020;39(2):215–221. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockerzi E, Vinciguerra R, Belin MW, Vinciguerra P, Ambrosio R, Jr., Seitz B. Correlation of the Corvis biomechanical factor with tomographic parameters in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(2):215–221. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Han T, Jhanji V, Shang J, Zhao J, Li M, Zhou X. Correlation between corneal topographic, densitometry, and biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2019;8(3):12. doi:10.1167/tvst.8.3.12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcelli G, Kling S, Quijano E, Pineda R, Marcos S, Yun SH. Brillouin microscopy of collagen crosslinking: noncontact depth-dependent analysis of corneal elastic modulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(2):1418–1425. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-11387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherfan D, Verter EE, Melki S, Gisel TE, Doyle FJ, Scarcelli G, Yun SH, Redmond RW, Kochevar IE. Collagen cross-linking using rose bengal and green light to increase corneal stiffness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3426–3433. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-11509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok SJJ, Kuznetsov IA, Kim M, Choi M, Scarcelli G, Yun SH. Selective two-photon collagen crosslinking in situ measured by Brillouin microscopy. Optica. 2016;3(5):469–472. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.3.000469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Su JP, Scarcelli G. Biomechanical changes after LASIK flap creation combined with rapid cross-linking measured with brillouin microscopy. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(6):408–414. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170421-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JN, Su JP, Scarcelli G. Mechanical outcome of accelerated corneal crosslinking evaluated by Brillouin microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(11):1458–1463. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JN, Langille E, Hafezi F, Randleman JB, Scarcelli G. Biomechanical impact of localized corneal cross-linking beyond the irradiated treatment area. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(4):253–260. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190304-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Roozbahani M, Piccinini AL, Golan O, Hafezi F, Scarcelli G, Randleman JB. Depth-dependent reduction of biomechanical efficacy of contact lens–assisted corneal cross-linking analyzed by brillouin microscopy. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(11):721–728. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20191004-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambekar YS, Singh M, Zhang J, Nair A, Aglyamov SR, Scarcelli G, Larin KV. Multimodal quantitative optical elastography of the crystalline lens with optical coherence elastography and Brillouin microscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2020;11(4):2041–2051. doi:10.1364/BOE.387361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu PJ, Kabakova IV, Ruberti JW, Sherwood JM, Dunlop IE, Paterson C, Torok P, Overby DR. Water content, not stiffness, dominates Brillouin spectroscopy measurements in hydrated materials. Nat Methods. 2018;15(8):561–562. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0076-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano VS, Dupps WJ. Jr. Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2017;57(3):75–86. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clayson K, Pavlatos E, Pan X, Sandwisch T, Ma Y, Liu J. Ocular pulse elastography: imaging corneal biomechanical responses to simulated ocular pulse using ultrasound. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(1):5. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.1.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Jones J, Tyrer JR, Marshall J. An interferometric ex vivo study of corneal biomechanics under physiologically representative loading, highlighting the role of the limbus in pressure compensation. Eye Vis. 2020; 7:43. doi:10.1186/s40662-020-00207-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson A, Jones J, Marshall J. Interferometric ex vivo evaluation of the spatial changes to corneal biomechanics introduced by topographic CXL: a pilot study. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(4):263–273. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210203-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, Liu L, Yu T, Chen F, Bai J, Liu T. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35(3):599–609. doi:10.1007/s10103-019-02854-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khamar P, Shetty R, Vaishnav R, Francis M, Nuijts R, Sinha Roy A. Biomechanics of LASIK flap and SMILE Cap: a prospective, clinical study. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(5):324–332. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190319-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev G, Sachdev MS, Sachdev R, Gupta H. Unilateral corneal ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(9):2014–2018. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropasqua L. Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1338–1339. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Naggar MT. Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):884–888. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cui C, Li Z, Tao X, Zhang C, Zhang X, Mu G. Corneal ectasia 6.5 months after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):1100–1106. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila JS, Holopainen JM. Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg. 2016;32(7):497–500. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160502-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voulgari N, Mikropoulos D, Kontadakis GA, Safi A, Tabibian D, Kymionis GD. Corneal scarring and hyperopic shift after corneal cross-linking for corneal ectasia after SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(11):779–782. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180921-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazo EE, McNeely RN, Arba-Mosquera S, Palme C, Moore JE. Unilateral ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(2):236–241. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Kumar NR, Khamar P, Francis M, Sethu S, Randleman JB, Krueger RR, Sinha Roy A, Ghosh A. Bilaterally asymmetric corneal ectasia following SMILE with asymmetrically reduced stromal molecular markers. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(1):6–14. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20181128-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiru B, Kling S, Hafezi F, Sekundo W. Biomechanical Properties of Human Cornea Tested by Two-Dimensional Extensiometry ex vivo in fellow eyes: femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(6):419–423. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180402-05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(7):454–460. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130617-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seven I, Vahdati A, Pedersen IB, Vestergaard A, Hjortdal J, Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ. Jr. Contralateral eye comparison of SMILE and flap-based corneal refractive surgery: computational analysis of biomechanical impact. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):444–453. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170504-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):167. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raevdal P, Grauslund J, Vestergaard AH. Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after refractive surgery by noncontact tonometry: small-incision lenticule extraction versus flap-based refractive surgery – a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(2):127–136. doi:10.1111/aos.13906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen IB, Bak-Nielsen S, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(8):1329–1335. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2667-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(5):310–318. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140422-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefat SM, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M, Mayer WJ, Kampik A, Kook D. Evaluation of changes in human corneas after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) using non-contact tonometry and ultra-high-speed camera (Corvis ST). Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(7):917–922. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1082185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin Y, Lopes B, Wang J, Wu J, Zhu M, Jiang M, Miao Y, Lin H, Cao S, Zheng X, et al. Biomechanical effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK and SMILE on the cornea. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:834270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1495–1503. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Roberts CJ, Ambrosio R, Jr., Elsheikh A, Kang DSY, Kim TI. Effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking combined with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy on dynamic corneal response parameters and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure measured with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy myopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):937–945. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez J, Rodriguez-Vallejo M, Martinez J, Tauste A, Pinero DP. Corneal thickness after SMILE affects scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):821–828. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160816-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y, Zhang X, Xu Y, Wang J, To CH, Liu Q. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(10):702–707. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140903-09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunathan VK, Thomasy SM, Strom P, Yanez-Soto B, Garland SP, Sermeno J, Reilly CM, Murphy CJ. Tissue and cellular biomechanics during corneal wound injury and repair. Acta Biomater. 2017; 58:291–301. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao F, Cao S, Wang J, Wang Y, Huang W, Zhu R, Zheng X, Huang J, Chen S, Li Y, et al. Regional changes in corneal shape over a 6-month follow-up after femtosecond-assisted LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(6):766–777. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB. Ectasia after corneal refractive surgery: nothing to SMILE about. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(7):434–435. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160613-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R, Jr., Dawson DG, Salomao M, Guerra FP, Caiado AL, Belin MW. Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low preoperative risk: tomographic and biomechanical findings in the unoperated, stable, fellow eye. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(11):906–911. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100428-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy AS, Dupps WJ. Jr. Patient-specific modeling of corneal refractive surgery outcomes and inverse estimation of elastic property changes. J Biomech Eng. 2011;133:e011002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandolfi A, Fotia G, Manganiello F. Finite element simulations of laser refractive corneal surgery. Eng Comput. 2009;25(1):15–24. doi:10.1007/s00366-008-0102-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar