Enhanced hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) removal from aqueous solution by Fe–Mn oxide-modified cattail biochar: adsorption characteristics and mechanism

References

• Hausladen DM, Alexander-Ozinskas A, Mcclain C, et al. Hexavalent chromium sources and distribution in California groundwater. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:8242–8251. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharagava RN, Mishra S. Hexavalent chromium reduction potential of Cellulosimicrobium sp. isolated from common effluent treatment plant of tannery industries. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;147:102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastopoulos I, Anagnostopoulos VA, Bhatnagar A, et al. A review for chromium removal by carbon nanotubes. Chemistry and Ecology. 2017;33:572–588. doi: 10.1080/02757540.2017.1328503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owlad M, Aroua MK, Daud WAW, et al. Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;200:59–77. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9893-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Cao Y, Shao Q, et al. Magnetic nanocarbon adsorbents with enhanced hexavalent chromium removal: morphology dependence of fibrillar vs particulate structures. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56:10689–10701. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamais D, Noutsopoulos C, Kavallari I, et al. Biological groundwater treatment for chromium removal at low hexavalent chromium concentrations. Chemosphere. 2016;152:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera-Díaz CE, Lugo-Lugo V, Bilyeu B. A review of chemical, electrochemical and biological methods for aqueous Cr (VI) reduction. J Hazard Mater. 2012;223:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage. 2011;92:407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miretzky P, Cirelli AF. Cr (VI) and Cr (III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2010;180:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Cao X, Ouyang X, et al. Adsorption kinetics of magnetic biochar derived from peanut hull on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution: effects of production conditions and particle size. Chemosphere. 2016;145:336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, et al. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:1812–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. Biochar for environmental management, Routledge, 2015, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Shang J, Zong M, Yu Y, et al. Removal of chromium (VI) from water using nanoscale zerovalent iron particles supported on herb-residue biochar. J Environ Manage. 2017;197:331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Liu W, Zhang N, et al. Polyethylenimine modified biochar adsorbent for hexavalent chromium removal from the aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol. 2014;169:403–408. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu K, Liu T, Xue W, et al. Arsenic(III) oxidation/adsorption behaviors on a new bimetal adsorbent of Mn-oxide-doped Al oxide. Chem Eng J. 2012;192:343–349. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi Y, Tu G, Zhao D, et al. Biomass waste components significantly influence the removal of Cr(VI) using magnetic biochar derived from four types of feedstocks and steel pickling waste liquor. Chem Eng J. 2019;360:212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Ding Z, Zimmerman AR, et al. Batch and column sorption of arsenic onto iron-impregnated biochar synthesized through hydrolysis. Water Res. 2015;68:206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altundogan HS. Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by iron (III) hydroxide-loaded sugar beet pulp. Process Biochem. 2005;40:1443–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li E, Zeng X, Fan Y. Removal of chromium ion(III) from aqueous solution by manganese oxide and microemulsion modified diatomite. Desalination. 2009;238:158–165. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Lv L, Qin Y, et al. Removal of aqueous Cr(VI) by a magnetic biochar derived from Melia azedarach wood. Bioresour Technol. 2018;256:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashtban Kenari SL, Barbeau B. Size and zeta potential of oxidized iron and manganese in water treatment: influence of pH, ionic strength, and hardness. J Environ Eng. 2016;142:40160101–40160109. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang J, Wang Z, et al. Synthesis of Ce-doped magnetic biochar for effective Sb(V) removal: performance and mechanism. Powder Technol. 2019;345:501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Gao B, Li Y, et al. Sorption of arsenate onto magnetic iron–manganese (Fe–Mn) biochar composites. RSC Adv. 2015;5:67971–67978. doi: 10.1039/C5RA12137J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Bruton TA, Li W, et al. Oxidation of benzene by persulfate in the presence of Fe(III)-and Mn(IV)-containing oxides: stoichiometric efficiency and transformation products. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:890–898. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong X, Ma L Q, Li Y. Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. J Hazard Mater. 2011;190:909–915. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuhl R, Krieg HM, Keizer K. Adsorption of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) ions by chitosan: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Water Sa. 2001;27:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya AK, Naiya TK, Mandal SN, et al. Adsorption, kinetics and equilibrium studies on removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using different low-cost adsorbents. Chem Eng J. 2008;137:529–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Xu R. Application of crop straw derived biochars to Cu(II) contaminated Ultisol: evaluating role of alkali and organic functional groups in Cu(II) immobilization. Bioresour Technol. 2013;133:537–545. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Niu J, Morales VL, et al. Transport and retention of biochar particles in porous media: effect of pH, ionic strength, and particle size. Ecohydrology. 2010;3:497–508. doi: 10.1002/eco.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R, Xiao S, Yuan J, et al. Adsorption of methyl violet from aqueous solutions by the biochars derived from crop residues. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10293–10298. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CM, Han J, Chu KH, et al. Influence of solution pH, ionic strength, and humic acid on cadmium adsorption onto activated biochar: experiment and modeling. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;48:186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.12.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan G, Mao Y, Wang H, et al. Comparison of biochar-and activated carbon-supported zerovalent iron for the removal of Se (IV) and Se (VI): influence of pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:21609–21618. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05497-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lützenkirchen J. Ionic strength effects on cation sorption to oxides: macroscopic observations and their significance in microscopic interpretation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1997;195:149–155. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1997.5160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Joshi TP, Liu R, et al. Adsorption combined with superconducting high gradient magnetic separation technique used for removal of arsenic and antimony. J Hazard Mater. 2018;343:36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Joshi TP, Liu R, et al. Synthesis of Ce (III)-doped Fe3O4 magnetic particles for efficient removal of antimony from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater. 2017;329:193–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang J, Zhang R, et al. Highly efficient As (V)/Sb (V) removal by magnetic sludge composite: synthesis, characterization, equilibrium, and mechanism studies. RSC Adv. 2016;6:42876–42884. doi: 10.1039/C6RA06208C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Shen D, Shen F, et al. Phosphate adsorption on lanthanum loaded biochar. Chemosphere. 2016;150:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Zheng J, Zheng P, et al. Sludge-derived biochar for arsenic (III) immobilization: effects of solution chemistry on sorption behavior. J Environ Qual. 2015;44:1119–1126. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.12.0536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvi K, Pattabhi S, Kadirvelu K. Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto activated carbon. Bioresour Technol. 2001;80:87–89. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00068-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namgay T, Singh B, Singh BP. Influence of biochar application to soil on the availability of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to maize (Zea mays L.). Soil Res. 2010;48:638–647. doi: 10.1071/SR10049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Xu Z, Feng Q, et al. Effect of pyrolysis condition on the adsorption mechanism of lead, cadmium and copper on tobacco stem biochar. J Clean Prod. 2018;187:996–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Gao M, Qiu W, et al. Fe–Mn–Ce oxide-modified biochar composites as efficient adsorbents for removing As (III) from water: adsorption performance and mechanisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:17373–17382. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04914-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Gao B, Li Y, et al. Manganese oxide-modified biochars: preparation, characterization, and sorption of arsenate and lead. Bioresour Technol. 2015;181:13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Gao B, Li Y. Enhanced arsenic removal by biochar modified with nickel (Ni) and manganese (Mn) oxyhydroxides. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;37:361–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.03.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Liu J, Shen J, et al. Preparation of MnOx-loaded biochar for Pb2+ removal: adsorption performance and possible mechanism. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;66:313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar