Factors related to consultation time: Experience in Slovenia

References

• Živčec, Kalan G, Švab, I, Car, J. Možni vzroki obremenjenosti zdravnikov družinske medicine v Sloveniji[Possible causes of family practitioners’ overwork in Slovenia, English summary]. Zdrav Var 2003;42:167–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Childs S. The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52: 1012–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A. Consultation length in general practice: A review. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41: 119–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundkvist J, Akerlind I, Borgquist L, Molstand S. The more time spend on listening, the less time spend on prescribing antibiotics in general practice. Fam Pract 2002; 19: 638–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack K, Grime J. GP's perspectives on managing time in consultation with patients suffering from depression: A qualitative study. Fam Pract 2003; 20: 262–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Mcdonald P, Hayes L, Cooney J. Health promotion in general practice consultation: A minute makes a difference. BMJ 1992; 304: 227–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson So, Ferry S, Mattsson B. Factors associated with consultation length and characteristics of short and long consultations. Scand J Prim Health Care 1993; 11: 61–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Causino N, Chag YC, Culpepper L, Marder, Saglam D., et al. The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 264–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A, Bensing J, De Maeseneer J. Consultation length in general practice: Cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 2002; 325: 472–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svab I. Primary health care reform in Slovenia: First results. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 141–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersnik J. Determinants of customer satisfaction with the health care system, with the possibility to choose a personal physician and with a family doctor in a transition country. Health Policy 2001; 57: 155–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebol Zadravec, M. Analiza napotitev zdravnika splošne medicine v času specializacije [Analysis of refferals by the general practitioner during the specialistic training, English summary]. Zdrav Var 2005;44:199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Švab, I, Petek Šter, M, Kersnik, J, Živčec Kalan, G, Car, J. Presečna študija o delu zdravnikov splošne medicine v Sloveniji [A cross-sectional study of performance of Slovene general practitioners, English summary]. Zdrav Var 2005;44:183–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sklep o načrtovanju, obračunavanju in beleženju zdravstvenih storitev. Available at:, , http://www.zzzs.si/zzzs/info/egradiva.nsf/o/3401CB5C8BB6EB4EC1256B61003E275D?OpenDocument. (in Slovene).
   Google Scholar
• DeSalvo KB, Block JP, Muntner P, Merrill W. Predictors of variation in office visit interval assignment. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 399–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landstrom, B, Rubenbeck, E, Mattson Bengt. Working behaviour of competent general practitioners: Personal styles and deliberate strategies. Scand J Prim Helth Care 2006;24:122–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahepold H, Maaroos HI, Kalda R, van dr Brink-Muinen A. Structure and duration of consultation in Estonian family practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003; 21: 167–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svab I, Kravos A, Vidmar G. Factors influencing home visits in Slovenian general practice. Fam Pract 2003; 20: 58–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zantinge EM, Verhaak PF, Kerssens JJ, Bensing JM. The workload of GPs: Consultations of patients with psychosocial and somatic problems compared. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 609–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flocke SA, Frank SH, Wenger DA. Adressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit. J Fam Pract 2001; 50: 211–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan HJ, Stange KC, Zyzynski SJ, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, Bertakis KD. Physician–elder interaction in community family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 19–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anon Prebivalstvo. Zdravstveni statistični letopis 2004. Inštitut za varovanje zdravja, Ljubljana. 2005:1–80, (in Slovene).
   Google Scholar
• Hjortdahl P, Borchgreving CF. Continuity of care: Influence of general practitioners’ knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultation. BMJ 1991; 303: 1181–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campell Jl, Ramsay J, Green J. Practice size: Impact on consultation length, workload, and patient assessment of care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51: 644–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenwegen PP, Hutten JB, van der Velden K. List size, composition of the practice and general practitioners’ workload in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 263–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govc Eržen, J, Selič Amon, M, Žmavc, A, Veninšek Kajba, S, Rajtmajer, M, Kolar, M. Koliko časa porabi zdravnik družinske medicine za administrativna opravila [How much time does a GP spend on administrative tasks?, English summary]. Zdrav Var 2004;43:111–16.
   Google Scholar