The quality of electronic patient records in Finnish primary healthcare needs to be improved

References

• Boerma WGW, Fleming DM. The role of general practice in primary health care. Stationery Office for WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Laki potilaan asemasta ja oikeuksista (785/92) [Act on the Status and Rights of Patients in Finland].Helsinki 1992. Available in English at: http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1992/en19920785.pdf (accessed 15 October 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Opas terveydenhuollon henkilöstölle: Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen, sekä niiden ja muun hoitoon liittyvän materiaalin säilyttäminen [Drawing up of patient documents and retention of them and other material related to care and treatment. A guide for healthcare staff]. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön oppaita, 2001: 3. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health in Finland; 2001 (English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Lääkkeiden määrääminen. Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön määräyskokoelma [Prescription of medication. Regulations of The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health]. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health in Finland 1999: 50:10.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd, Patientjournallagen [Directions and general advice of The National Board of Health and Welfare, Patient record legislation]. Available at: http://www.sos.se/sosfs/1993_20/1993_20.htm (accessed 15 October 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bekendtgørelse om lægers, tandlægers, kiropraktorers, jordemødres, kliniske diætisters, kliniske tandteknikeres, tandplejeres, optikeres og kontaktlinseoptikeres patientjournaler (journalføring, opbevaring, videregivelse og overdragelse m.v.) [Statement on the patient records of doctors, dentists, chiropractors, midwives, clinical dieticians, clinical dental technicians, dental nurses, opticians and contact lens opticians (documentation, preserving, forwarding and transfer of data etc.)]. Available at: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=11055 (accessed 15 October 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sosial- og helsedepartementet. Forskrift om pasientjournal 19/2002 [Ministry of Health and Care Services: Directions on patient records]. Available at: http://www.lovdata.no/cgi-wift/ldles?doc=/sf/sf/sf-20001221-1385.html (accessed 15 October 2007).
   Google Scholar
• WHO Regional Office in Europe. Framework for professional and administrative development of general practice/family medicine in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wonca Europe. The European definition of general practice/family medicine. Ljubljana: Wonca Europe; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• European Institute for Health Records. Available at: http://www.eurorec.org (accessed 15 October 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hartikainen K, Kuusisto-Niemi S, Lehtonen E. Sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon tietojärjestelmäkartoitus 2001 [Survey on data systems in social welfare and health care services 2001]. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, 2002. Available at: http://sty.stakes.fi/NR/rdonlyres/00BDBB83-AEE0-467B-949C-EB73DFE12704/1318/osve1_02.pdf (accessed 15 October 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Okuyemi KS, Harris KJ, Ahluwalia JS, Wallace DD. Documentation of smoking: Role of age, gender and ethnicity. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys 2001; 12: 125–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ 2003; 326: 1070–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald T, Blignaut PJ. A. Comparison of a manual and a computer system in a primary health care clinic. Curationis 1998; 21: 8–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wager KA, Lee FW, White AW, Ward DM, Ornstein SM., McDonald T, Blignaut PJ. A. Impact of an electronic medical record system on community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000; 13: 338–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elson RB, Connelly DP. Computerized patient records in primary care: Their role in mediating guideline-driven physician behaviour change. Arch Fam Med 1995; 4: 698–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loomis GA, Ries JS, Saywell RM, Jr, Thakker NR. If electronic records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?. Fam Pract 2002; 51: 636–41
   Google Scholar
• Kuusela M, Vainiomäki P, Hinkka S, Rautava P. The quality of GP consultation in two different salary systems. Scand J Prim Health Care 2004; 22: 168–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokko S. Towards fragmentation of general practice and primary healthcare in Finland?. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007; 25: 131–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntyselkä P, Halonen P, Vehviläinen A, Takala J, Kumpusalo J. Access to and continuity of primary medical care of different providers as perceived by the Finnish population. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007; 25: 27–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V, Coupland C, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care: Regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ 2003; 326: 1439–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudswaard AM, Lam K, Stolk RP, Rutten GE. Quality of recording of data from patients with type 2 diabetes is not a valid indicator of quality of care: A cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2003; 20: 173–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Fillaux J, Alvarez M, Massip P, Lang T. A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: More randomized clinical trials or a broader approach?. Int J Qual Health Care 2000; 16: 407–16
   Google Scholar