Three- and four-digit ICD-10 is not a reliable classification system in primary care

References

• Koch H, Graubner B, Brenner G. Erprobung der Diagnosenverschlüsselung mit der ICD-10 in der Praxis des niedergelassenen Arztes. ZI für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der BRD. Wissenschaftliche Reihe Band 54. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln 1998
   Google Scholar
• Soler JK, Okkes I, Wood M, Lamberts H. The coming of age of ICPC: Celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care. Fam Pract 2008; 25: 312–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese T, Sandholzer H, Voigt S, Voigt R. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in German general [ractitioners’ consultation – Results of the SESAM 2 study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2008; 116: 326–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vainiomäki S, Kuusela M, Vainiomäki P, Rautava P. The quality of electronic patient records in Finish primary healthcare needs to be improved. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008; 26: 117–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein RM, Hollingworth GR, Viner G, Shearman J, Labelle C, Thomas R. Reliability issues in coding encounters in primary care using an ICPC/ICD-10-based controlled clinical terminology. J Am Med Informatics Assoc Symposium (Suppl) 1997; 21: 843
   Google Scholar
• Surján G. Questions on validity of International Classification of Diseases-coded diagnoses. Int J Med Inform 1999; 54: 77–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stausberg J, Lehmann N, Kaczmarek D, Stein M. Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77: 50–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stausberg J, Lehmann N, Kaczmarek D, Stein M. Einheitliches Kodieren in Deutschland: Wunsch und Wirklichkeit. Das Krankenhaus 2005; 8: 657–62
   Google Scholar
• Stausberg J, Lehmann N. Kodierübungen im Medizinstudium. Wie gut kodieren Anfänger mit der ICD-10?. GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol 2005; 1: Doc04
   Google Scholar
• Vikström A, Skånér Y, Strender LE, Nilsson GH. Mapping the categories of the Swedish primary health care version of ICD-10 to SNOMED CT concepts: Rule development and intercoder reliability in a mapping trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007; 2: 7–9
   Google Scholar
• Skovgaard AM, Houmann T, Christiansen E, Andreasen AH. The reliability of the ICD-10 and the DC 0-3 in an epidemiological sample of children 1½ years of age. Infant Mental Health J 2005; 26: 470–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siebel U, Michels R, Hoff P, Schaub RT, Droste R, Freyberger HJ, Dilling H. Multiaxiales System des Kapitels V(F) der ICD-10 Erste Ergebnisse der der multizentrischen Praktikabilitäts- und Reliabilitätsstudie. Nervenarzt 1997; 68: 231–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson G, Petersson H, Ahlfeldt H, Strender LE. Evaluation of three Swedish ICD-10 primary care versions: Reliability and ease of use in diagnostic coding. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39: 325–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Jones MR, Matchar DB, Edwards LJ, Hoff J, Chilukuri V, Armstrong SB, Horner RD. Improving the reliability of stroke subgroup classification using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. Stroke 2001; 32: 1091–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller W, Dichtl G, Hecht H, Hundt W, von Zerssen D. An empirical comparison of diagnoses and reliabilities in ICD-10 and DSM-III-R. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1993; 242: 209–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholls, Chater, R, Lask, B. Children into DSM don't go: A comparison of classification systems for eating disorders in childhood and early adolescence. Int J Eat Disord 2000;28:317–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemse GR, van Yperen TA, Rispens J. Reliability of the ICD-10 classification of adverse familial and environmental factors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003; 44: 202–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson N, Bridgman SA. A novel method for the assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic codes in general surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80: 293–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson T, Shepheard J, Sundararajan V. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2006; 44: 1011–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries KH, Rankin JM, Carere RG, Buller CE, Kiely FM, Spinelli JJ. Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: Are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 343–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CCM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiology Med Care 2002; 40: 675–85
   Google Scholar
• Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical modification administrative data. Med Care 2004; 42: 801–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar