http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-0161
References
- Larsen M, Oldeide C, Malterud K. Not so bad after all…, Women’s experiences of pelvic examinations. Fam Pract. 1997;14:148–152.
- Kling JM, Vegunta S, Al-Badri M, et al. Routine pelvic examinations: a descriptive cross-sectional survey of women’s attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines. Prev Med. 2017;94:60–64.
- Wijma B, Gullberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:422–428.
- World Health Organization. Primary care–now more than ever. Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2008/en/ (accessed 24 June 2018).
- Chan BT. The declining comprehensiveness of primary care. CMAJ. 2002;166:429–434.
- Lundevall S, Prytz P, Aschim B, Prestegaard K, editors. Hva, hvordan og med hvem? Praktiske ferdigheter i allmennmedisin. [Practical procedures in general practice]. Oslo: The Norwegian Medical Association; 2002.
- Legestatistikk [Physician statistics]. Available at: http://legeforeningen.no/Emner/Andre-emner/Legestatistikk/ (accessed 24 June 2018).
- Thoma B. The other side of the speculum. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55:1112–1113.
- Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1998–2007.
- Pahle AS, Sørli D, Kristiansen IS, et al. Practice variation in surgical procedures and IUD-insertions among general practitioners in Norway – a longitudinal study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:7.
- Bloomfield H, Olson A, Cantor A, et al. Screening pelvic examinations in asymtpomatic average risk adult women. Veterans Affairs Evidence-based Synthesis Program Project #09-009. Washington DC: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2013.
- Adonakis GL, Paraskevaidis E, Tsiga S, et al. A combined approach for the early detection of ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65:221–225.
- Treadwell J, McCartney M. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: generalists-it’s time for a grassroots revolution. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66:116–117.
- Saini V, Brownlee S, Elshaug AG, et al. Addressing overuse and underuse around the world. The Lancet 2018;390:105–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32573-9.
- Stormo AR, Cooper CP, Hawkins NA, et al. Physician characteristics and beliefs associated with use of pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women. Prev Med. 2012;54:415–421.
- Helsedirektoratet Nasjonal faglig retningslinje for svangerskapsomsorgen [National Clinical Guideline for Antenatal Care]. IS-1339/E 2005. Available online: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/svangerskapsomsorgen (accessed 20 May 2019).
- Hunskaar S, editor. Allmennmedisin. [General practice]. 3rd ed. Oslo: Gyldendal; 2013.
- Ingram JC, Calnan MW, Greenwood RJ, et al. Risk taking in general practice: GP out-of-hours referrals to hospital. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59:e16–e24.
- Fiddes P, Scott A, Fletcher J, et al. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of patients and providers. Contraception 2003;67:313–317.
- Webb R, Opdahl M. Breast and pelvic examinations: easing women’s discomfort. Can Fam Physician 1996;42:54–58.
- Price DH, Tracy CS, Upshur RE. Chaperone use during intimate examinations in primary care: postal survey of family physicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:52.
- DiFi. Innbyggerundersøkelsen [Norwegian Agency for Public Management and eGovernment, Citizen survey] 2017. Available at: https://www.difi.no/rapporter-og-statistikk/undersokelser/innbyggerundersokelsen-2017/data (accessed 24 June 2018).
- Bignell CJ. Chaperones for genital examination. BMJ 1999;319:137–138.