References
- Fugelli P. Du skal skrive ditt fag. Tidsskrift for Den norske Laegeforening 1984;104:3.
- Rortveit G. Primary care research in Norway: going in the right direction. Scand J Prim HC. 2017;35:1–2.
- Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
- Popper KR. The logic of scientific discovery. London (UK): Routledge; 2002.
- Perrow C. Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. New York (NY): Basic Books; 1984.
- Grimsmo A, Lohre A, Rosstad T, et al. Disease-specific clinical pathways - are they feasible in primary care? A mixed-methods study. Scand J Prim HC. 2018;36:152–160.
- Last JM. A dictionary of epidemiology. 2nd ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1988.
- Grossi E. Medical concepts related to individual risk are better explained with “plausibility” rather than “probability”. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:31.
- Aven TB, Flage R, Zio E. Uncertainty in risk assessment. The representation and treatment of uncertainties by probabilistic and non-probabilistic methods. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2014.
- Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating uncertainty - the next medical revolution? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1713–1715.
- Wulff HR, Pedersen SA, Rosenberg R. Philosophy of medicine. An introduction. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1986.