Personal responsibility for health? A phenomenographic analysis of general practitioners’ conceptions

References

• Bognar G, Hirose I. The ethics of health care rationing: an introduction. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Socialdepartementet. Vårdens svåra val: Slutbetänkande av prioriteringstredningen. [Health care’s difficult choices]. Stockholm: Fritzes; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson E, André M, Borgquist L, et al. Priority setting in primary health care – dilemmas and opportunities: a focus group study . BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork J, Lynoe N, Juth N. Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrioriteringsCentrum Linköping. Vårdens alltför svåra val? Kartläggning av prioriteringsarbete och analys av riksdagens principer och riktlinjer för prioriteringar i hälso- och sjukvården [Health care’s all to difficult choices?]. Linköping: PrioriteringsCentrum, Landstinget i Östergötland; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman L. Vilken vägledning ger den etiska plattformen för prioriteringar i konkreta prioriteringssituationer?: En översikt av tolknings-och tillämpningssvårigheter [What guidance does the ethical platform offer for setting priorities in specific situations?]. Linköping: PrioriteringsCentrum Linköping; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Elmersjö C-Å, Helgesson G. Notions of just health care at three Swedish hospitals. Med Health Care Philos. 2008;11(2):145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jallinoja P, Absetz P, Kuronen R, et al. The dilemma of patient responsibility for lifestyle change: perceptions among primary care physicians and nurses. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(4):244–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin M, Lewis S, Willis K, et al. Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Chronic Illn. 2018;14(2):79–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen MP, Beune EJAJ, Baim-Lance AM, et al. Diabetes self-management support for patients with low health literacy: perceptions of patients and providers. J Diabetes. 2015;7(3):418–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrin C, Kahan S, Turner M, et al. Current attitudes and practices of obesity counselling by health care providers. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017;11(3):352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traina G, Feiring E. There is no such thing as getting sick justly or unjustly’ – a qualitative study of clinicians’ beliefs on the relevance of personal responsibility as a basis for health prioritisation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearley KE, Freeman GK, Heath A. An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(470):712–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudebeck CE. Relationship based care – how general practice developed and why it is undermined within contemporary healthcare systems. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(3):335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F. Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr Sci. 1981;10(2):177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridlund B, Hildingh C. Qualitative research methods in the service of health. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Stenfors‐Hayes T, Hult H, Dahlgren MA. A phenomenographic approach to research in medical education. Med Educ. 2013;47(3):261–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerlind GS. Academic growth and development – how do university academics experience it? High Educ. 2005;50(1):1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren L-O, Fallsberg M. Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. Res Social Adm Pharm. 1991;8:150–156.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson S. Kvalitativ analys-exemplet fenomenografi. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Sin S. Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. Int J Qual Methods. 2010;9(4):305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson PF. Freedom and resentment and other essays. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon T. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Segall S. Health, luck, and justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Watson G. Agency and answerability: selected essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Brown RC, Maslen H, Savulescu J. Against moral responsibilisation of health: prudential responsibility and health promotion. Public Health Ethics. 2019;12(2):114–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mola E. Patient empowerment, an additional characteristic of the European definitions of general practice/family medicine. Eur J Gen Pract. 2013;19(2):128–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson M, Moir J, Skelton J, et al. When the business of sharing treatment decisions is not the same as shared decision making: a discourse analysis of decision sharing in general practice. Health. 2011;15(1):78–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh Ospina N, Phillips KA, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, et al. Eliciting the patient’s agenda- secondary analysis of recorded clinical encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(1):36–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Elia TR, et al. The physician-as-stakeholder: an exploratory qualitative analysis of physicians’ motivations for using shared decision making in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(12):1417–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk J, Helgesson G, Juth N. Better in theory than in practise? Challenges when applying the luck egalitarian ethos in health care policy. Med Health Care Philos. 2020;23(4):735–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein HF. Family medicine’s identity: being generalists in a specialist culture? Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(5):455–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). Core Values and Principles of Nordic General Practice/Family Medicine. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;38(4):367–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfon N, Larson K, Lu M, et al. Lifecourse health development: past, present and future. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(2):344–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmot M, Bell R. Social inequalities in health: a proper concern of epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26(4):238–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa E, Giardini A, Savin M, et al. Interventional tools to improve medication adherence: review of literature. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1303–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorkiewicz S, Tran V-T, Cousyn C, et al. Discordance between drug adherence as reported by patients and drug importance as assessed by physicians. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(5):415–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meddings J, Kerr EA, Heisler M, et al. Physician assessments of medication adherence and decisions to intensify medications for patients with uncontrolled blood pressure: still no better than a coin toss. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini V, Ho PM. Interventions to improve medication adherence: a review. JAMA. 2018;320(23):2461–2473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walseth LT, Abildsnes E, Schei E. Patients’ experiences with lifestyle counselling in general practice: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29(2):99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodegård H, Helgesson G, Juth N, et al. Challenges to patient centredness – a comparison of patient and doctor experiences from primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuguero O, Ramon Marsal J, Esquerda M, et al. Association between low empathy and high burnout among primary care physicians and nurses in Lleida, Spain. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23(1):4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson H, Whittington R, Perry L, et al. Examining the relationship between burnout and empathy in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Burn Res. 2017;6:18–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bringedal B, Feiring E. On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(6):357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public’s views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. BMJ. 1999;318(7188):916–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard A, McCosker H, Gerber R. Phenomenography: a qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(2):212–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar