1,934
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Association of personalised care plans with monitoring and control of clinical outcomes, prescription of medication and utilisation of primary care services in patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational real-world study

, , , , , & show all
Pages 39-47 | Received 01 Mar 2021, Accepted 22 Sep 2021, Published online: 11 Feb 2022

References

  • Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the american diabetes association (ADA) and the european association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2669–2701.
  • Bakke Å, Cooper JG, Thue G, et al. Type 2 diabetes in general practice in Norway 2005–2014: moderate improvements in risk factor control but still major gaps in complication screening. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000459.
  • Heltberg A, Andersen JS, Kragstrup J, Siersma V, et al. Social disparities in diabetes care: a general population study in Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35(1):54–63.
  • Ceriello A, Barkai L, Christiansen JS, et al. Diabetes as a case study of chronic disease management with a personalized approach: the role of a structured feedback loop. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(1):5–10.
  • Fritzen K, Stautner C, Schnell O. Patient-centred care in type 2 diabetes mellitus - Key aspects of PDM-ProValue are reflected in the 2018 ADA/EASD consensus report. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;158:107897.
  • Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, et al. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long‐term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2015. Mar 3 [cited 2020 May 15];2015(3). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6486144/.
  • Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Salford National Institute for Health Research Gastrointestinal programme Grant Research Group, et al. Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f2882.
  • Kilo CM. A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the institute for healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series. Qual Manag Health Care. 1998;6(4):1–13.
  • Mikkola I, Hagnäs M, Hartsenko J, et al. A personalized care plan is positively associated with better clinical outcomes in the care of patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional real-life study. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44(2):133–138.
  • Vuohijoki A, Mikkola I, Jokelainen J, et al. Implementation of a personalized care plan for patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes: an observational Real-World study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:215013272092170.
  • Hansen LJ, Siersma V, Beck-Nielsen H, et al. Structured personal care of type 2 diabetes: a 19 year follow-up of the study diabetes care in general practice (DCGP). Diabetologia. 2013;56(6):1243–1253.
  • ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • Bentsen BG. International classification of primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1986; Jan 14(1):43–50.
  • Komulainen J, Vuokko R, Mäkelä M. Rakenteinen terveys- ja hoitosuunnitelma [Structured health and care plan]. National Institute of Health and Welfare (THL); 2011. (accessed 2020 May 15). Available from: http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/80180.
  • Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, ESH Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring, et al. European society of hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the second international consensus conference on home blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26(8):1505–1526.
  • Laakso M, Groop L, Isomaa B, et al. [Update on current care guideline. Diabetes]. Duodecim Laaketieteellinen Aikakauskirja. 2016;132(9):881–882.
  • van Dongen JJJ, Lenzen SA, van Bokhoven MA, et al. Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients’ care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):17.
  • van Dongen JJJ, van Bokhoven MA, Daniëls R, et al. Developing interprofessional care plans in chronic care: a scoping review. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):17.
  • Wong CKH, Wong WCW, Lam CLK, et al. Effects of patient empowerment programme (PEP) on clinical outcomes and health service utilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: an observational matched cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e95328.
  • Hsieh A, Ong PX, Molyneaux L, et al. Age of diabetes diagnosis and diabetes duration associate with glycated haemoglobin. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;104(1):e1-4–e4.
  • Lamidi ML, Wikström K, Inglin L, et al. Trends in the process and outcome indicators of type 2 diabetes care: a cohort study from Eastern Finland, 2012-2017. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):253.
  • Saucier AN, Ansa B, Coffin J, et al. Patient perspectives of an individualized diabetes care management plan. EJPCH. 2017;5(2):213–219.
  • Li SQ, Guthridge S, Lawton P, et al. Does delay in planned diabetes care influence outcomes for aboriginal australians? A study of quality in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):19. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699070/
  • Laleci Erturkmen GB, Yuksel M, Sarigul B, et al. Personalised care plan management utilizing Guideline-Driven clinical decision support systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:750–754.
  • Laleci Erturkmen GB, Yuksel M, Sarigul B, et al. A collaborative platform for management of chronic diseases via Guideline-Driven individualized care Plans. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019;17:869–885.
  • Raivio R, Jääskeläinen J, Holmberg-Marttila D, et al. Decreasing trends in patient satisfaction, accessibility and continuity of care in Finnish primary health care - a 14-year follow-up questionnaire study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:98.
  • Raivio R, Holmberg-Marttila D, Mattila KJ. Patients' assessments of the continuity of primary care in Finland: a 15-year follow-up questionnaire survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(627):e657–e663.