1,299
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Contacts to general practice in the 12 months preceding a diagnosis of an abdominal cancer: a national register-based cohort study

, , , , &
Pages 148-156 | Received 19 Apr 2021, Accepted 13 Dec 2021, Published online: 01 Apr 2022

References

  • Christensen KG, Fenger-Gron M, Flarup KR, et al. Use of general practice, diagnostic investigations and hospital services before and after cancer diagnosis – a population-based nationwide registry study of 127,000 incident adult cancer patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:224.
  • Jensen H, Torring ML, Olesen F, et al. Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:636.
  • Vandvik PO, Kristensen P, Aabakken L, et al. Abdominal complaints in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22(3):157–162.
  • Holtedahl K, Hjertholm P, Borgquist L, et al. Abdominal symptoms and cancer in the abdomen: prospective cohort study in European primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(670):e301–e310.
  • Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, et al. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):73–79.
  • Vedsted P, Olesen F. A differentiated approach to referrals from general practice to support early cancer diagnosis – the Danish three-legged strategy. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl. 1):S65–S69.
  • Lyratzopoulos G, Vedsted P, Singh H. Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl. 1):S84–S91.
  • Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl. 1):S92–S107.
  • Weller D, Vedsted P, Rubin G, et al. The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(7):1262–1267.
  • Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(12):1231–1272.
  • Ahrensberg JM, Fenger-Grøn M, Vedsted P. Use of primary care during the year before childhood cancer diagnosis: a nationwide population-based matched comparative study. PLOS One. 2013;8(3):e59098.
  • Zhou Y, Abel GA, Hamilton W, et al. Imaging activity possibly signalling missed diagnostic opportunities in bladder and kidney cancer: a longitudinal data-linkage study using primary care electronic health records. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;66:101703.
  • Morrell S, Young J, Roder D. The burden of cancer on primary and secondary health care services before and after cancer diagnosis in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):431.
  • Jensen H, Vedsted P, Møller H. Consultation frequency in general practice before cancer diagnosis in relation to the patient's usual consultation pattern: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;55:142–148.
  • Lyratzopoulos G, Neal RD, Barbiere JM, et al. Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):353–365.
  • Thygesen LC, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, et al. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl.):12–16.
  • Andersen JS, Olivarius Nde F, Krasnik A. The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl.):34–37.
  • Grønning A, Assing Hvidt E, Nisbeth Brøgger M, et al. How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e039442.
  • Koo MM, Hamilton W, Walter FM, et al. Symptom signatures and diagnostic timeliness in cancer patients: a review of current evidence. Neoplasia. 2018;20(2):165–174.
  • Harrell F. Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models LR, and survival analysis. 1st ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2001.
  • Denmark S. Uddannelsesstatistikkens manual [Manual of educational statistics]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Statistics Denmark Inc.; 2016.
  • Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, et al. NORDCAN — a Nordic tool for cancer information, planning, quality control and research. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(5):725–736.
  • Hansen PL, Hjertholm P, Vedsted P. Increased diagnostic activity in general practice during the year preceding colorectal cancer diagnosis. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(3):615–624.
  • Lyratzopoulos G, Wardle J, Rubin G. Rethinking diagnostic delay in cancer: how difficult is the diagnosis? BMJ. 2014;349:g7400.
  • Probst HB, Hussain ZB, Andersen O. Cancer patient pathways in Denmark as a joint effort between bureaucrats, health professionals and politicians — a national Danish project. Health Policy. 2012;105(1):65–70.
  • Summerton N, Cansdale M. Artificial intelligence and diagnosis in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(684):324–325.
  • Evans J, Ziebland S, MacArtney JI, et al. GPs' understanding and practice of safety netting for potential cancer presentations: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(672):e505–e511.
  • CanTest: Investigation of potential for using point of care tests for early cancer diagnosis in primary care; [cited 2021 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.cantest.org/research-projects/investigation-of-potential-for-using-point-of-care-tests-for-early-cancer-diagnosis-in-primary-care-phd/
  • Verbakel JY, Turner PJ, Thompson MJ, et al. Common evidence gaps in point-of-care diagnostic test evaluation: a review of horizon scan reports. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e015760.
  • Walter FM, Thompson MJ, Wellwood I, et al. Evaluating diagnostic strategies for early detection of cancer: the CanTest framework. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):586.