Suitability of issuing sickness certifications in remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed method study of GPs’ experiences

References

• The Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion. Prop. 42 L. (2022–2023). Endringer i folketrygdloven (adgang til å sykmelde etter e-konsultasjon). Amendments to the national insurance act (access to issuing sickness certificates in remote consultations). Norwegian. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/prop.-42-l-20222023/id2961772/.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren A, Hagberg J, Arrelöv B, et al. Frequency and nature of problems associated with sickness certification tasks: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 5455 physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(3):178–185. doi:10.1080/02813430701430854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winde LD, Alexanderson K, Carlsen B, et al. General practitioners’ experiences with sickness certification: a comparison of survey data from Sweden and Norway. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13(1):10. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letrilliart L, Barrau A. Difficulties with the sickness certification process in general practice and possible solutions: a systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;18(4):219–228. doi:10.3109/13814788.2012.727795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakvik A, Holmås TH, Kamrul Islam M. Does variation in general practitioner (GP) practice matter for the length of sick leave? A multilevel analysis based on norwegian GP-patient data. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1590–1598. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrelöv B, Alexanderson K, Hagberg J, et al. Dealing with sickness certification – a survey of problems and strategies among general practitioners and orthopaedic surgeons. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):273. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engblom M, Alexanderson K, Englund L, et al. When physicians get stuck in sick-listing consultations: a qualitative study of categories of sick-listing dilemmas. Work. 2010;35(2):137–142. doi:10.3233/WOR-2010-0965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsen B, Norheim OF. "Saying no is no easy matter" a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5(1):70. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-5-70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stray KN, Thomassen OJ, Vike H. Assessing sick-listed clients’ work ability: A moral mission? Critical Social Policy. 2023;43(3):448–468. doi:10.1177/02610183221113171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen S, Werner EL, Maeland S, et al. Considerations made by the general practitioner when dealing with sick-listing of patients suffering from subjective and composite health complaints. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29(1):7–12. doi:10.3109/02813432.2010.514191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Knorring M, Sundberg L, Löfgren A, et al. Problems in sickness certification of patients: a qualitative study on views of 26 physicians in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(1):22–28. doi:10.1080/02813430701747695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen B, Lind JT, Nyborg K. Why physicians are lousy gatekeepers: sicklisting decisions when patients have private information on symptoms. Health Econ. 2020;29(7):778–789. doi:10.1002/hec.4019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivold J, Rø KI, Hjörleifsson S. Conditions for gatekeeping when GPs consider patient requests unreasonable: a focus group study. Fam Pract. 2022;39(1):125–129. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmab072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, et al. What do GPs feel about sickness certification? A systematic search and narrative review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(2):67–75. doi:10.3109/02813431003696189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsenorge. Your right to medical care; [cited 2022 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.helsenorge.no/en/health-rights-in-norway/health-care-rights/#general-practitioner.
   Google Scholar
• Morken T, Rebnord IK, Maartmann-Moe K, et al. Workload in Norwegian general practice 2018 – an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):434. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4283-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ose SO, Kaspersen SL, Leinonen T, et al. Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees: a comparison of nine North-Western European countries. Health Policy. 2022;126(7):619–631. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen E, Atherton H, Austad B, et al. Older patients’ experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023;41(1):33–42. doi:10.1080/02813432.2022.2161307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidt EA, Søndergaard J, Klausen M, et al. Not just an information-delivery tool. An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;38(4):411–420. doi:10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhof D, Ingram A, Ochieng R, et al. Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east Midlands, UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1030. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07039-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg BL, Getz LO, Johnsen TM, et al. General practitioners’ experiences with potentials and pitfalls of video consultations in Norway During the COVID-19 lockdown: qualitative analysis of free-text survey answers. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e45812. doi:10.2196/45812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlund AJ, Holm IM, Zanaboni P. General practitioners’ perceptions towards the use of digital health services for citizens in primary care: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e028251. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen TM, Norberg BL, Kristiansen E, et al. Suitability of video consultations During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: cross-sectional survey among norwegian general practitioners. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e26433. doi:10.2196/26433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy M, Scott LJ, Salisbury C, et al. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(704):e166–e177. doi:10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez T, Anaya YB, Shih KJ, et al. A qualitative study of primary care physicians’ experiences With telemedicine During COVID-19. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(Suppl):S61–S70. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PS, Koo S, Panter S. The value of physical examination in the era of telemedicine. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2021;51(1):85–90. doi:10.4997/JRCPE.2021.122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen E, Breivik E, Bergmo TS, et al. E-konsultasjon og sykmelding – Undersøkelse av erfaringer med unntak fra krav til personlig fremmøte under covid-19-pandemien. [E-consultation and sickness certification – Examination of experiences with exceptions from requirements for personal attendance during the covid-19 pandemic]. NSE-rapport (03-2021). Tromsø: Norwegian Centre for E-health Research. Norwegian. https://ehealthresearch.no/files/documents/Rapporter/NSE-rapport_2021-03_E-konsultasjon-og-sykmelding.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805. doi:10.1177/1403494812465030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li E, Tsopra R, Jimenez G, et al. General practitioners’ perceptions of using virtual primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international cross-sectional survey study. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1(5):e0000029. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000029.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Ladds E, Hughes G, et al. Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2022;72(718):e351–e360. doi:10.3399/BJGP.2021.0658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordling P, Priebe G, Björkelund C, et al. Assessing work capacity – reviewing the what and how of physicians’ clinical practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12875-020-01134-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma P, Kerrison R. Patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-method rapid review of the literature. BJGP Open. 2022;6(2):BJGPO.2021.0192. doi:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swartling MS, Hagberg J, Alexanderson K, et al. Sick-listing as a psychosocial work problem: a survey of 3997 Swedish physicians. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):398–408. doi:10.1007/s10926-007-9090-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling A, Arrelöv B. Sickness certification as a complex professional and collaborative activity–a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):702. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsen S, Malterud K, Werner EL, et al. GPs’ negotiation strategies regarding sick leave for subjective health complaints. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(1):40–46. doi:10.3109/02813432.2015.1001943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Due TD, Thorsen T, Andersen J. Use of alternative consultation forms in Danish general practice in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01468-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar