Reliability of Radiological and Cosmetic Measurements in Hallux Valgus

References

• Austin D. W., Leventen E. O. A new osteotomy for hallux valgus: a horizontally directed “V” displacement osteotomy of the metatarsal head for hallux valgus and primus varus. Clin Orthop 1981; 25–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland J. M., Altman D. G. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990; 20: 337–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi T. D., Davitt J., Younger A., Holt S., Sangeorzan B. J. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle in adult hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 722–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou L. B., Mann R. A., Casillas M. M. Biplanar chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 579–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Condon F., Kaliszer M., Conhyea D., O'Donnell T., Shaju A., Masterson E. The first intermetatarsal angle in hallux valgus: an analysis of measurement reliability and the error involved. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 717–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coughlin M. J. Hallux valgus: an instructional course lecture at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78A: 932–66
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin M. J. Hallux valgus in men: effect of the distal metatarsal articular angle on hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Int 1997; 18: 463–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coughlin M. J., Freund E. Roger A. Mann award. The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22: 369–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elveru R. A., Rothstein J. M., Lamb R. L., Riddle D. L. Methods for taking subtalar joint measurements. A clinical report. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 678–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J. L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss J. L. Reliability of measurement. The design and analysis of clinical experimentsNew YorkJohn Wiley, F. L Fleiss, 1986; 1–32, In
   Google Scholar
• Hardy R., Clapham J. Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951; 33B: 376–91
   Google Scholar
• Hattrup S. J., Johnson K. A. Chevron osteotomy: analysis of factors in patients' dissatisfaction. Foot Ankle 1985; 5: 327–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins F. B., Mitchell C. L., Hedrick D. W. Correction of hallux valgus by metatarsal osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1945; 27: 387–94
   Google Scholar
• Johnson K. A., Cofield R. H., Morrey B. F. Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus. Clin Orthop 1979; 44–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindgren U., Turan I. A new operation for hallux valgus. Clin Orthop 1983; 179–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowery J. C., Wilkins E. G., Kuzon W. M., Davis J. A. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 36: 601–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundberg-Jensen A., Kofoed H., Levi N. Visual analogue scoring and importance rating for ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Surg 2001; 4: 163–6
   Google Scholar
• Mann R. A., Rudicel S., Graves S. C. Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 124–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J. W. Distal first metatarsal displacement osteotomy. Its place in the schema of bunion surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 923–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell C. L., Fleming J. L., Allen R., Glenney C., Sanford G. A. Osteotomy–bunionectomy for hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A: 41–58; discussion 59–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J., Nester C. J., Long A. F., Barrie J. The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 56–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott H. The natural history of hallux valgus in adolescence and early adult life. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1960; 42: 749–60
   Google Scholar
• Resch S. Results after chevron osteotomy and proximal osteotomy for hallux valgus: a prospective, randomized study. The Foot 1993; 3: 99–104
   Google Scholar
• Resch S., Ryd L., Stenstrom A., Johnsson K., Reynisson K. Measuring hallux valgus: a comparison of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy. Foot Ankle Int 1995; 16: 267–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson E. G., Graves S. C., McClure J. T., Boone R. T. First metatarsal head-shaft angle: a method of determination. Foot Ankle 1993; 14: 181–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saltzman C. L., Brandser E. A., Berbaum K. S., DeGnore L., Holmes J. R., Katcherian D. A., et al. Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 661–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sammarco G. J., Russo-Alesi F. G. Bunion correction using proximal chevron osteotomy: a single-incision technique. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 430–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider W., Csepan R., Knahr K. Reproducibility of the radiographic metatarsophalangeal angle in hallux surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 494–9
   Google Scholar
• Schneider W., Knahr K. Metatarsophalangeal and intermetatarsal angle: different values and interpretation of postoperative results dependent on the technique of measurement. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 532–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider W., Knahr K. Surgery for hallux valgus. The expectations of patients and surgeons. Int Orthop 2001; 25: 382–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrout P. E., Fleiss J. L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver D. The operative treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1923; 5: 225
   Google Scholar
• Smith R. W., Reynolds J. C., Stewart M. J. Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle 1984; 5: 92–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbot K. D., Saltzman C. L. Assessing sesamoid subluxation: how good is the AP radiograph?. Foot Ankle Int 1998; 19: 547–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trnka H. J., Muhlbauer M., Zembsch A., Hungerford M., Ritschl P., Salzer M. Basal closing-edge osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus and metatarsus primus varus: 10- to 22-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 1999; 20: 171–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venning P., Hardy R. H. Sources of error in the production and measurement of standard radiographs of the foot. Br J Radiol 1951; 24: 18–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veri J. P., Pirani S. P., Claridge R. Crescentic proximal metatarsal osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus: a mean 12.2 year follow-up study. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22: 817–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vittetoe D. A., Saltzman C. L., Krieger L., Brown T. Reliability and validity of the first distal metatarsal articular angle. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 541–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar