In-Vitro Evaluation of Coronary Stents and 64-Detector-Row Computed Tomography Using a Newly Developed Model of Coronary Artery Stenosis

References

• Cademartiri F., Marano R., Runza G., Mollet N., Nieman K., Luccichenti G., et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005; 109: 500–7
   Google Scholar
• Colombo A., Stankovic G., Moses J. W. Selection of coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1021–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong C., Chrysant G. S., Woodard P. K., Bae K. T. Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 233: 286–91
   Google Scholar
• Hunold P., Vogt F. M., Schmermund A., Debatin J. F., Kerkhoff G., Budde T., et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 2003; 226: 145–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa T., Fujii T., Tomohiro Y., Maeda K., Kobayashi M., Kunita E., et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2006; 109: 188–94
   Google Scholar
• Kopp A. F., Schroeder S., Baumbach A., Kuettner A., Georg C., Ohnesorge B., et al. Non-invasive characterisation of coronary lesion morphology and composition by multislice CT: first results in comparison with intracoronary ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1607–11
   Google Scholar
• Kruger S., Mahnken A. H., Sinha A. M., Borghans A., Dedden K., Hoffmann R., et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003; 89: 167–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letourneau-Guillon L., Soulez G., Beaudoin G., Oliva V. L., Giroux M. F., Qin Z., et al. CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15: 615–24
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken A. H., Buecker A., Wildberger J. E., Ruebben A., Stanzel S., Vogt F., et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 27–33
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken A. H., Muhlenbruch G., Seyfarth T., Flohr T., Stanzel S., Wildberger J. E., et al. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 36–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maintz D., Seifarth H., Flohr T., Kramer S., Wichter T., Heindel W., et al. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 790–5
   Google Scholar
• Maintz D., Seifarth H., Raupach R., Flohr T., Rink M., Sommer T., et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 818–26
   Google Scholar
• Maintz D., Tombach B., Juergens K. U., Weigel S., Heindel W., Fischbach R. Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a phantom model. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1319–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollough C. H., Primak A. N., Saba O., Bruder H., Stierstorfer K., Raupach R., et al. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 2007; 243: 775–84
   Google Scholar
• Mohlenkamp S., Pump H., Baumgart D., Haude M., Grönemeyer D. H., Seibel R. M., et al. Minimally invasive evaluation of coronary stents with electron beam computed tomography: in vivo and in vitro experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 48: 39–47
   Google Scholar
• Nieman K., Cademartiri F., Raaijmakers R., Pattynama P., de Feyter P. Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography. Herz 2003; 28: 136–42
   Google Scholar
• Pump H., Moehlenkamp S., Sehnert C., Schimpf S. S., Erbel R., Seibel R. M., et al. Electron-beam CT in the noninvasive assessment of coronary stent patency. Acad Radiol 1998; 5: 858–62
   Google Scholar
• Pump H., Mohlenkamp S., Sehnert C. A., Schimpf S. S., Schmidt A., Erbel R., et al. Coronary arterial stent patency: assessment with electron-beam CT. Radiology 2000; 214: 447–52
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder S., Flohr T., Kopp A. F., Meisner C., Kuettner A., Herdeg C., et al. Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by X-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 900–6
   Google Scholar
• Seifarth H., Raupach R., Schaller S., Fallenberg E. M., Flohr T., Heindel W., et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 721–6
   Google Scholar
• Ulzheimer S., Kalender W. A. Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 484–97
   Google Scholar
• Wahl A., Paetsch I., Roethemeyer S., Klein C., Fleck E., Nagel E. High-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular MR imaging after coronary revascularization in patients with wall motion abnormalities at rest. Radiology 2004; 233: 210–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar