References
- Lock S. Does editorial peer review work?. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 60–1
- Editorial. Bad peer reviewers. Nature 2001; 413: 93
- Hanks G. Peer review in action: the contribution of referees to advancing reliable knowledge. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 359–70
- Cobo E., Selva-O'Callagham A., Ribera J. M., Cardellach F., Dominguez R., Vilardell M. Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial. PLoS ONE 2007; 2: e332
- Ozonoff D. Statistics in peer review. Nature's peer review debate. Nature 2006, doi: 10.1038/nature04989. Available at URL: http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/index.html (July 16, 2007)
- Jeng M. Error in statistical tests of error in statistical tests. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 45
- Schor S. The responsibilities of a statistical reviewer. Chest 1972; 61: 486–7