Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Adnexal Masses

References

• Moon HM. Ovarian tumors: general considerations and mode of spread. Radiology illustrated: gynecologic imaging1st ed, SH Kim, BL McClennan, EK Outwater. Cambridge University Press, New York 2005; 453–99
   Google Scholar
• Kinkel K, Hricak H, Lu Y, Tsuda K, Filly RA. US characterization of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 217: 803–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain KA, Friedman DL, Pettinger TW, Alagappan R, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Sommer FG. Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 186: 697–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, Harada M, Higashida Y, Takahashi M, et al. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194: 557–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazot M, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E. MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2687–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orden MR, Jurvelin JS, Kirkinen PP. Kinetics of US contrast agent in benign and malignant adnexal tumors. Radiology 2003; 226: 405–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieber A, Nussle K, Stohr I, Grab D, Frenchel S, Kreienberg R, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 123–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens SK, Hricak H, Stern JL. Ovarian lesions: detection and characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1991; 181: 481–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, Kinkel K, Yu K, Sica G, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging – multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000; 214: 39–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1297–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medl M, Kulenkampff KJ, Stiskal M, Peters-Engl C, Leodolter S, Czembirek H. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Anticancer Res 1995; 15: 1123–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occhipinti KA. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the ovary. Gynecologic imagingAnderson JC, ed. Churchill Livingstone, London 1999; 345–59
   Google Scholar
• Saini A, Dina R, McIndoe GA, Soutter WP, Gishen P, deSouza NM. Characterization of adnexal masses with MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1004–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstner R, Hricak H, White S. CT and MRI of ovarian cancer. Abdom Imaging 1995; 20: 2–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2000; 20: 1445–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung JI, Hahn ST. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2002; 22: 1305–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, Kim HK, Cho SM, Kim B, et al. Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1259–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RK, Levine D, Hatabu H, Edelman RR. Ovarian fibroma: findings by contrast-enhanced MRI. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22: 535–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Troiano RN, Lazzarini KM, Scoutt LM, Lange RC, Flynn SD, McCarthy S. Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology 1997; 204: 795–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO histological classification of tumours of the ovary, In. FA Tavassoli, Devilee, P. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics. Tumors of the breast and female genital organs. 1st ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003. p. 114–5.
   Google Scholar
• Popovich, MJ, Hricak, H. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of gynecologic disease. In: PW Callen. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994. p. 660–88.
   Google Scholar
• Brown DL, Zou KH, Tempany CM, Frates M, Silverman S, McNeil B, et al. Primary versus secondary ovarian malignancy: imaging findings of adnexal masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study. Radiology 2001; 219: 213–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K, Shibata T, et al. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180: 73–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar