References
- Rolland Y, Duvauferrier R, Lucas A, Gourlay C, Morcet N, Rambeau M, et al. Lower limb angiography: a prospective study comparing carbon dioxide with iodinated contrast material in 30 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 333–7
- Oliva VL, Denbow N, Therasse E., Common AA, Marie-France Giroux CH. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities: carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10: 723–31
- Beese RC, Bees NR, Belli AM. Renal angiography using carbon dioxide. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 3–6
- Moresco KP, Patel NH, Namyslowski Y, Shah H, Johnson MS, Trerotola SO. Carbon dioxide angiography of the transplanted kidney: technical considerations and imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 1271–6
- Kerns SR, Hawkins IF, Jr. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography: expanding applications and technical evolution. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 735–41
- Cho KJ. Visceral CO2 digital subtraction angiography. Carbon dioxide angiography: principles, techniques, and practices. New York: Informa Healthcare, KJ Cho, IF Hawkins, 2007; 69–84
- Caridi JG, Stavropoulos SW, Hawkins IF. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography for renal artery stent placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10: 635–40
- Hawkins IF, Jr, Johnson AW, Caridi JG, Weingarten KE. CO2 fine-needle TIPS. J Vasc Interv Radiol 997; 8: 235–9
- Eschelman DF, Sullivan KL, Bonn J, Gardiner GA, Jr. Carbon dioxide as a contrast agent to guide vascular interventional procedures. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 1265–70
- Sullivan KL, Bonn J, Shapiro MJ, Gardiner GA. Venography with carbon dioxide as a contrast agent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995; 18: 141–5
- Debernardi-Venon W, Bandi J, Garcia-Pagan J, Moitinho E, Andreu V, Real M, et al. CO2 wedged hepatic venography in the evaluation of portal hypertension. Gut 2000; 46: 856–60
- Boyd-Kranis R, Sullivan KL, Eschelman DJ, Bonn J, Gardiner GA. Accuracy and safety of carbon dioxide inferior vena cavography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10: 1183–9
- Figley MM. Splenoportography: some advantages and disadvantages. Radiology 1958; 80: 313–23
- Redman HC, Reuter SR, Miller WJ. Improvement of superior mesenteric and portal vein visualization with tolazoline. Invest Radiol 1969; 4: 24
- Cho KJ, Cho DR. CO2 digital subtraction splenoportography with the “skinny” needle: experimental study in a swine model. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2003; 26: 273–6
- Caridi JG, Hawkins IF, Cho K. CO2 splenoportography: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1375–8
- Cho KJ, Matel W. Recognition of splenic vein occlusion. Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131: 439–43
- Hawkins IF, Jr, Caridi JG, Klioze SD, Mladinich CR. Modified plastic bag system with O-ring fitting connection for carbon dioxide angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 229–32