References
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004; 230: 619–28
- Kalra MK, Naz N, Rizzo SM, Blake MA. Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2005; 34: 171–81
- Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005; 237: 213–23
- Hart D, Wall BF. Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental X-ray examinations. Report of National Radiological Protection Board 2002; NRPB-W4.
- Scanff P, Donadieu J, Pirard P, Aubert B. Population exposure to ionizing radiation from medical examinations in France. Br J Radiol 2008; 81: 204–13
- Tenkanen-Rautakoski P. Number of radiological examinations in Finland in 2005. Report of Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland 2006; STUK-B-STO 62.
- Aldrich JE, Duran E, Dunlop P, Mayo JR. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography. J Digit Imaging 2006; 19: 126–31
- Varonen H, Makela M, Savolainen S, Laara E, Hilden J. Comparison of ultrasound, radiography, and clinical examination in the diagnosis of acute maxillary sinusitis: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 940–8
- Aalokken TM, Hagtvedt T, Dalen I, Kolbenstvedt A. Conventional sinus radiography compared with CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 60–2
- Reider JM, Nashelsky J, Neher J. Clinical inquiries. Do imaging studies aid diagnosis of acute sinusitis?. J Fam Pract 2003; 52: 565–7
- Soimakallio S, Kivisaari L, Manninen H, Svedström E, Tervonen O. Radiologia. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY Ltd.; 2005. p. 534–6.
- Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 923–9
- Gruber M, Uffmann M, Weber M, Prokop M, Balassy C, Schaefer-Prokop C. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1544–50
- STUK – Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. Röntgentutkimuksesta potilaalle aiheutuvan säteilyaltistuksen määrittäminen. STUK Tiedottaa 2004; 1/2004.
- Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF. Coefficients for estimating effective doses from pediatric X-ray examinations. Report of National Radiological Protection Board 1996; NRPB-R 279.
- Mulkens TH, Broers C, Fieuws S, Termote JL, Bellnick P. Comparison of effective doses for low-dose MDCT and radiographic examination of sinuses in children. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1611–8
- Sillers MJ, Kuhn FA, Vickery CL. Radiation exposure in paranasal sinus imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 112: 248–51