In vivo dose verification of IMRT treated head and neck cancer patients

References

• Burman C, Chui CS, Kutcher G, Leibel S, Zelefsky M, LoSasso T, et al. Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 863–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark CH, Mubata CD, Meehan CA, Bidmead AM, Staffurth J, Humphreys ME, et al. IMRT clinical implementation: prostate and pelvic node irradiation using Helios and a 120-leaf multileaf collimator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2002; 3: 273–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Low DA. Quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2002; 12: 219–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Esch A, Bohsung J, Sorvari P, Tenhunen M, Paiusco M, Iori M, et al. Acceptance tests and quality control (QC) procedures for the clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using inverse planning and the sliding window technique: experience from five radiotherapy departments. Radiother Oncol 2002; 65: 53–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins PD, Alaei P, Gerbi BJ, Dusenbery KE. In vivo diode dosimetry for routine quality assurance in IMRT. Med Phys 2003; 30: 3118–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai JS, Wazer DE, Ling MN, Wu JK, Fagundes M, DiPetrillo T, et al. Dosimetric verification of the dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy of 92 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 40: 1213–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jornet N, Carrasco P, Jurado D, Ruiz A, Eudaldo T, Ribas M. Comparison study of MOSFET detectors and diodes for entrance in vivo dosimetry in 18 MV x-ray beams. Med Phys 2004; 31: 2534–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramaseshan R, Kohli KS, Zhang TJ, Lam T, Norlinger B, Hallil A, et al. Performance characteristics of a microMOSFET as an in vivo dosimeter in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 4031–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarantino CW, Ruslander DM, Rini CJ, Mann GG, Nagle HT, Black RD. An implantable radiation dosimeter for use in external beam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2004; 31: 2658–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasma KL, Heijmen BJM, Kroonwijk M, Visser AG. Portal dose image (PDI) prediction for dosimetric treatment verification in radiotherapy. I. An algorithm for open beams. Med Phys 1998; 25: 830–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasma KL, Dirkx ML, Kroonwijk M, Visser AG, Heijmen BJ. Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys 1999; 26: 2373–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boellaard R, van Herk M, Uiterwaal H, Mijnheer B. First clinical tests using a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device and a convolution model for the verification of the midplane dose. Radiother Oncol 1998; 47: 303–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boellaard R, Essers M, van Herk M, Mijnheer BJ. New method to obtain the midplane dose using portal in vivo dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41: 465–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen VN, Evans PM, Swindell W. The application of transit dosimetry to precision radiotherapy. Med Phys 1996; 23: 713–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris CK, Elson HR, Lamba MA, Foster AE. Comparison of effectiveness of thermoluminescent crystals LiF:Mg,Ti, and LiF:Mg,Cu,P for clinical dosimetry. Med Phys 1997; 24: 1527–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers DW, Faddegon BA, Ding GX, Ma CM, We J, Mackie TR. BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 1995; 22: 503–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraldsson P, Knoos T, Nystrom H, Engstrom P. Monte Carlo study of TLD measurements in air cavities. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: N253–N259
   Google Scholar
• Engelsman M, Damen EM, Koken PW, 't Veld AA, van Ingen KM, Mijnheer BJ. Impact of simple tissue inhomogeneity correction algorithms on conformal radiotherapy of lung tumours. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60: 299–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz C, Nill S, Oelfke U. Comparison of IMRT optimization based on a pencil beam and a superposition algorithm. Med Phys 2003; 30: 1909–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Nahum AE, Mohan R. Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 983–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar