A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT and Volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques

References

• Boice JD, Harvey EB, Blettner M, Stovall M, Flannery JT. Cancer in the contralateral breast after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 781–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Fisher SG, Emami B. Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: A population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 1038–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnithan J, Macklis RM. Contralateral breast cancer risk. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60: 239–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvey EB, Brinton LA. Second cancer following cancer of the breast in Connecticut, 1935–82. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985; 68: 99–112
   Google Scholar
• Damen EM, Brugmans MJ, Van der Horst A, Bos L, Lebesque JV, Mijnheer BJ, et al. Planning, computer optimization, and dosimetric verification of a segmented irradiation technique for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 49: 1193–5
   Google Scholar
• Brugmans MJ, Van der Horst A, Lebesque JV, Mijnheer BJ. Beam intensity modulation to reduce the field sizes for conformal irradiation of lung tumors: A dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43: 893–904
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyer AL, Geis P, Grant W, Carol M. Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 227–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans PM, Donovan EM, Patridge M, Childs PJ, Convery DJ, Eagle S, et al. The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields. Radiother Oncol 2000; 57: 79–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CX, Li XA, Ma L, Chen D, Nagvi S, Shephard D, et al. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 453–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu CX. Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: An alternative to tomotherapy. Phys Med Biol 1995; 40: 1435–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron C. Sweeping-window arc therapy: An implementation of rotational IMRT with automatic beam-weight calculation. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 4317–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortuz C, Kappas C, Webb S. Intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) with centrally blocked rotational fields. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 2185–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duthoy W, De Gersem W, Vergote K, Coghe M, Botenberf T, De Deene Y, et al. Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): First clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57: 1019–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earl M, Shepard D, Nagvi S, Li X, Zu CX. Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 1075–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie MA, Robinson DM. Intensity modulated arc deliveries approximated by a large number of fixed gantry position sliding window dynamic multileaf collimator fields. Med Phys 2002; 29: 2359–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otto K. Volumetric Modulated Arc therapy: IMRT in a single arc. Med Phys 2008; 35: 310–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen S, Danielsen T, Olsen DR. Estimated risk for secondary cancer in the contra-lateral breast following radiation therapy of breast cancer. Acta Oncol 2008; 47: 391–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahnesjö A. Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. Med Phys 1989; 16: 577–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer W, Pyyry J, Kaissl W. A 3D photon superposition/convolution algorithm and its foundation on results of Monte Carlo calculations. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 1767–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulmer W, Harder D. A triple Gaussian pencil beam model for photon radiations in treatment planning. Med Phys 1995; 5: 25–30
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer W, Harder D. Applications of a triple Gaussian pencil beam model for photon beam treatment planning. Med Phys 1996; 6: 68–74
   Google Scholar
• Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Vanetti E, Clivio A, Cozzi L. Dosimetric validation of the anistropic Analytical Algorithm for photon dose calculation: Fundamental characterisation in water. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 1421–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogliata A, Vanetti E, Albers D, Brink C, Klivio A, Knöös T, et al. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: Comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 1363–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogliata A, Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Winkler P, Cozzi L. The impact of photon dose calculation algorithms on lung tissue under different respiratory phases. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 1421–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knöös T, Wieslander E, Cozzi L, Brink C, Fogliata A, Albers D, et al. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 5785–807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Alber M, Asell M, Dobler B, El-Haddad M, et al. IMRT for breast, a planning study. Radiother Oncol 2005; 76: 300–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzi L, Dinshaw KA, Shivastava SK, Mahantshetty U, Engineer R, Deshpande DD, et al. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89: 180–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogliata, A, Clivio, A, Vanetti, E, Nicolini, G, Cozzi, L. Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumours. A planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc and fixed gantry techniques. Radiother Oncol 2008 ( in press)
   Google Scholar
• Preston DL, Mattsson A, Holmberg E, Shore R, Hildreth NG, Boice JD, Jr. Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: A pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat Res 2002; 158: 220–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasu A, Toma-Dasu I, Olofsson J, Karlsson M. The use of risk estimation models for the induction of secondary cancer following radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2005; 44: 339–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi G, Lax I, Söderström S, Gyenes G, Rutqvist LE. Prediction of excess risk of long-term cardiac mortality after radiotherapy of stage I breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 1998; 46: 63–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham MV, Purdy JA, Emami B, Harms W, Bosch W, Lockett MA, et al. Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 45: 323–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wim D, De Gersem W, Vergote K, Boterberg T, Derie C, Smeets P, et al. Clincial implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 2004; 60: 794–806
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwa S, Lebesque J, Theuws JC, Marks LB, Munley MT, Bentel G, et al. Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: An analysis of pooled data of 540 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau D, Adams E, Webb S, Ross G. Cardiac avoidance in breast radiotherapy: A comparison of simple shielding techniques with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2001; 60: 247–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen S, Olsen DR, Danielsen T, Malinen E. Contralateral breast doses following radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes: Measurements and treatment planning calculations. Radiother Oncol 2007; 82: 332–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenbalg F, Neuensschwander H, Mini R, Born EJ. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anistropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC + +Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 3679–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar