Technology in exercise-based cancer rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study of receptiveness and readiness for e-Health utilization in Danish cancer rehabilitation

References

• Ammitzbøll G, Søgaard K, Karlsen RV, et al. Physical activity and survival in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016;66:67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1409–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, et al. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:815–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority. Forløbsprogram for rehabilitering og palliation i forbindelse med kraeft – del afsamlet forløbsprogram for kraeft. Kbh. 2012;1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson R, Hall S, Sinclair JE, et al. Using technology to deliver cancer follow-up: a systematic review. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Apr 9]; 14. Available from: http://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2407-14-311.
   Google Scholar
• Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Aaronson NK, et al. A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AL, Fisher A, Smith L, et al. Digital health behaviour change interventions targeting physical activity and diet in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:704–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakicic JM, Davis KK, Rogers RJ, et al. Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: the IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein EA, Haaland BA, Bilger M, et al. Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:983–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monkman H, Kushniruk AW. The consumer health information system adoption model. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;218:26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griebel L, Enwald H, Gilstad H, et al. eHealth literacy research—Quo vadis? Inform. Health Soc Care. 2017;43:427–442.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton SO, Schüz J, Engholm G, et al. Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: summary of findings. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:2074–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser L, Karnoe A, Furstrand D, et al. A multidimensional tool based on the eHealth literacy framework: development and initial validity testing of the eHealth literacy questionnaire (eHLQ). J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard O, Furstrand D, Klokker L, et al. The e-health literacy framework: a conceptual framework for characterizing e-health users and their interaction with e-health systems. Int J KMEL. 2015;7:522–540.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:192–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, et al. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser L, Rossen S, Karnoe A, et al. Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals’ Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting. J Med Internet Res. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 12]; forthcoming/in press. Available from: http://preprints.jmir.org/ preprint/10377/accepted.
   Google Scholar
• Chuttur M. Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Indiana University, USA. Sprouts Work. Pap. Inf. Syst. [Internet]; 2009. Available from: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO, editor. ISCED 2011 operational manual: guidelines for classifying national education programmes and related qualifications. Paris: OECD; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Commision: Descriptors defining levels in the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) [Internet]. European Commision -Learning Opportunities and Qualifications in Europe [cited 2018 Dec 12]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/en/content/descriptors-page.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips SM, Conroy DE, Keadle SK, et al. Breast cancer survivors’ preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25:3243–3252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroman KG, Arthanat S, Lysack C. “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;43:156–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerberg A, Söderlund A, Lindén M. Technologies for physical activity self-monitoring: a study of differences between users and non-users. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017; 8:17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:568–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter E, Brainin E. eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser L, Nøhr C, Bertelsen P, et al. Theory and practice in digital behaviour change: a matrix framework for the co-production of digital services that engage, empower and emancipate marginalised people living with complex and chronic conditions. Informatics. 2018;5:41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustsen IR, Larsen SB, Vibe-Petersen J, et al. Social position and referral to rehabilitation among cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:720–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar