MRI-based automatic segmentation of rectal cancer using 2D U-Net on two independent cohorts

References

• Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ, et al. Deep learning for fully-automated localization and segmentation of rectal cancer on multiparametric MR. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving B, Franklin JM, Papież BW, et al. Pieces-of-parts for supervoxel segmentation with global context: application to DCE-MRI tumour delineation. Med Image Anal. 2016;32:69–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn N, Bugg W, Chan A, et al. Manual and semi-automated delineation of locally advanced rectal cancer subvolumes with diffusion-weighted MRI. Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1114):20200543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malayeri AA, El Khouli RH, Zaheer A, et al. Principles and applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer detection, staging, and treatment follow-up. Radiographics. 2011;31(6):1773–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller DS, Berho M, Perez RO, et al. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(7):414–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Lu J, Qin G, et al. Technical note: a deep learning-based autosegmentation of rectal tumors in MR images. Med Phys. 2018;45(6):2560–2564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian J, Xiong F, Xia W, et al. Fully convolutional networks (FCNs)-based segmentation method for colorectal tumors on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2018;41(2):393–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-J, Dou Q, Wang Z-X, et al., editors. HL-FCN: hybrid loss guided FCN for colorectal cancer segmentation. 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018); 2018 Apr 4-7; Washington, DC. IEEE; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Xie P, Ran Z, et al. Full convolutional network based multiple side-output fusion architecture for the segmentation of rectal tumors in magnetic resonance images: a multi-vendor study. Med Phys. 2019;46(6):2659–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueland S, Ree AH, Grøholt KK, et al. Oxaliplatin-containing preoperative therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: local response, toxicity and long-term outcome. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(8):532–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakke KM, Grovik E, Meltzer S, et al. Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and multiecho dynamic contrast-based MRI in rectal cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(4):1114–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakke KM, Meltzer S, Grovik E, et al. Sex differences and tumor blood flow from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI are associated with treatment response after chemoradiation and long-term survival in rectal cancer. Radiology. 2020;297(2):352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seierstad T, Hole KH, Groholt KK, et al. MRI volumetry for prediction of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Brit J Radiol. 2015;88(1051):20150097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 reference manual. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, Scikit-Image Contributors, et al. Scikit-image: image processing in python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Machine Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv Z, Lowekamp BC, Johnson HJ, et al. SimpleITK image-analysis notebooks: a collaborative environment for education and reproducible research. J Digit Imaging. 2018;31(3):290–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, et al., editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9351. Cham: Springer; 2015. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
   Google Scholar
• Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi S-A, editors. V-Net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation 2016. 4th International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV); 25-28 Oct 2016; Stanford, CA. IEEE; 2016. p. 19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/3DV.2016.79
   Google Scholar
• Knuth F. GitHub repository knuth_2021_mri; 2021 [2021-20-21]. Available from: https://github.com/Medical-Radiation-Physics-NTNU/knuth_2021_mri.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh BN. deoxys – Framework for running deep-learning experiments with emphasis on cancer tumor auto-segmentation; 2021 [2021-06-21]. Available from: https://pypi.org/project/deoxys/.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen TA. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol Skar. 1948;5:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1937;32(200):675–701.
   Google Scholar
• Nemenyi PB. Distribution-free multiple comparisons. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, SciPy 1.0 Contributors, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat Methods. 2020;17(3):261–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpilowski MA. Scikit-posthocs: pairwise multiple comparison tests in python. JOSS. 2019;4(36):1169.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9(3):90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinke A, Eisenmann M, Tizabi MD, et al. Common limitations of image processing metrics: a picture story. 2021. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05642
   Google Scholar
• He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al., editors. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2016 Jun 27-30; Las Vegas, NV. IEEE; 2016. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
   Google Scholar
• Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, et al., editors. Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2017 Jul 21-26; Honolulu, HI. IEEE; 2017. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243
   Google Scholar
• Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar