Physical and psychological symptom burden in patients and caregivers during follow-up care after curative surgery for cancers in the pancreas, bile ducts or duodenum

References

• Valle JW, Borbath I, Khan SA, et al. Biliary cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v28–v37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v56–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengso KE, Andersen EW, Thomsen T, et al. Increased psychological symptom burden in patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based cohort study. Pancreatology. 2020;20(3):511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengso KE, Thomsen T, Andersen EW, et al. The psychological symptom burden in partners of pancreatic cancer patients: a population-based cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(11):6689–6699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengso KE, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Dalton SO, et al. Gut disruption impairs rehabilitation in patients curatively operated for pancreaticoduodenal cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberg Dengso K, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Oksbjerg Dalton S, et al. It’s all about the CA-19-9. A longitudinal qualitative study of patients’ experiences and perspectives on follow-up after curative surgery for cancer in the pancreas, duodenum or bile-duct. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(5):642–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akizuki N, Shimizu K, Asai M, et al. Prevalence and predictive factors of depression and anxiety in patients with pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(1):71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda M, Neale RE, Klein K, et al. Anxiety, depression and quality of life in people with pancreatic cancer and their carers. Pancreatology. 2017;17(2):321–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Gong J, Cao Q, et al. A literature review of the relationship between dyadic coping and dyadic outcomes in cancer couples. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;54:102035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakkeforløb for kræft i bugspytkirtel, galdegange og leve. For fagfolk In: authority TDH, editor. Copenhagen The Danish Health Authority 2021. p. 1–44. Available from: https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2021/pakkeforloeb-for-kraeft-i-bugspytkirtel_-galdegange-og-lever
   Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend E, Yadegarfar G, Byrne C, et al. Development of a questionnaire (EORTC module) to measure quality of life in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer, the EORTC QLQ-BIL21. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(4):587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulis DB, Velikova A, Greimel G, et al. Eortc Quality Of Life Group translation procedure: EORTC Quality of Life Group. 2017. Fourth: [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/translation_manual_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Giesinger JM, Loth FLC, Aaronson NK, et al. Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers P, Bjordal KMG, et al. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. 3rd ed. Brussels; 2001. Available from: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wittrup-Jensen KU, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, et al. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37(5):459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reenen M, Oppe M. EQ-5D-3L user guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument. The Netherlands; 2015. Available from: https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides
   Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadisches coping inventar: testmanual (dyadic coping inventory: test manual). Bern, Switzerland: Huber; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Levesque C, Lafontaine M-F, Carion A. Validation of the English version of the dyadic coping inventory. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2014;47:215–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gmelch S, Bodenmann G, Meuwly N, et al. Dyadishes coping inventar (DCI): ein fragebogen zur erfassung des partnerschaftlichen umgangs mit stress (dyadic coping inventory (DCI): a questionnaire assessing dyadic coping in couples with stress). J Fam Res. 2008;20:185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ledermann T, Bodenmann G, Gagliardi S, et al. Psychometrics of the dyadic coping inventory in three language groups. Swiss J Psychol. 2010;69:201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottmann N, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, et al. Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: a longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychol. 2015;34(5):486–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980;20(6):649–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner AS, Morimoto T, Arai Y, et al. Assessing family caregiver’s mental health using a statistically derived cut-off score for the zarit burden interview. Aging Ment Health. 2006;10(2):107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg BLAJ. Zarit burden interview: pragmatic study in a dedicated cognitive function clinic. Prog Neurol Psychiat. 2015:27.
   Google Scholar
• Hagell P, Alvariza A, Westergren A, et al. Assessment of burden among family caregivers of people with Parkinson’s disease using the Zarit burden interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(2):272–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberg Dengso K, Hillingso J, Marcussen AM, et al. Health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression in patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo TP, Burrell SA, Sauter PK, et al. A progressive postresection walking program significantly improves fatigue and health-related quality of life in pancreas and periampullary cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):463–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Hodgman CF, Schadler KL, et al. Effect of exercise on pancreatic cancer patients during treatment: a scoping review of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(7):5669–5690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer MR, Bright EE, MacDonald JJ, et al. Quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer and their caregivers: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2018;47(4):368–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer. Cancer program standards. Version 1.1. Ensuring patient centered care. Chigaco: American College of Surgeons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Institue of Medicine. Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washinton DC: National Academic Press (US); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Foster C, Myall M, Scott I, et al. You can’t say, "what about me?" I’m not the one with cancer’: information and support needs of relatives. Psychooncology. 2015;24(6):705–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrin K, Bowen DJ, Alfano CM, et al. Adjusting to pancreatic cancer: perspectives from first-degree relatives. Palliat Support Care. 2009;7(3):281–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engebretson A, Matrisian L, Thompson C. Pancreatic cancer: patient and caregiver perceptions on diagnosis, psychological impact, and importance of support. Pancreatology. 2015;15(6):701–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar