Pilot implementation of MiLES: a web-based intervention targeted at managers with the aim of enhancing the successful return to work of employees with cancer

References

• Cancer research UK. Cancer incidence by age. 2020; [cited 2020 Jan 27]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age#heading-Zero.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe MS, Bhatia S, Oeffinger KC, et al. American society of clinical oncology statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):631–640. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.6854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(4):657–670. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0377-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duijts SF, Kieffer JM, van Muijen P, et al. Sustained employability and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors up to four years after diagnosis. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):174–182. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, et al. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(Suppl 3):S8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker R, Duijts SFA, Smith SN, et al. Functional impairments and work-related outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):429–451. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9736-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duijts SF, van Egmond MP, Spelten E, et al. Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(5):481–492. doi: 10.1002/pon.3467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehnert A, Koch U. Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation–a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(1):76–87. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltrinieri S, Fugazzaro S, Bertozzi L, et al. Return to work in European cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(9):2983–2994. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4270-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer AG, Torp S, Popa A, et al. Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14(2):135–150. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00862-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer AG, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, et al. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301(7):753–762. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanly P, Timmons A, Walsh PM, et al. Breast and prostate cancer productivity costs: a comparison of the human capital approach and the friction cost approach. Value Health. 2012;15(3):429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedtke CM, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. Employers’ experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(5):562–577. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0626-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedtke C, Donceel P, de Rijk A, et al. Return to work following breast cancer treatment: the employers’ side. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(3):399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greidanus MA, de Boer A, Tiedtke CM, et al. Supporting employers to enhance the return to work of cancer survivors: development of a web-based intervention (MiLES intervention). J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14(2):200–210. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00844-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greidanus MA, Tamminga SJ, de Rijk AE, et al. What employer actions are considered most important for the return to work of employees with cancer? A delphi study among employees and employers. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(2):406–422. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9800-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greidanus MA, de Rijk AE, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. The use and perceived usefulness of an online toolbox targeted at employers (MiLES intervention) for enhancing successful return to work of cancer survivors. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):393–404. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09929-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansler JP, Havn E. Pilot implementation of health information systems: issues and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(9):637–648. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes SJ, McBain SA, Curran GM. An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Psychiatry Res. 2019;280:112513. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main CJ, Nicholas MK, Shaw WS, et al. Implementation science and employer disability practices: embedding implementation factors in research designs. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):448–464. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9677-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing MJP, Grol RPTM. Implementatie: effectieve verbetering van de patiëntenzorg. Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brug J, van Assema P. Lechner L. Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering, 9th ed. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum BV; 2017.p. 83–211.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Berlin: Springer; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröer CA, Janssen M, van Amelsvoort LG, et al. Organizational characteristics as predictors of work disability: a prospective study among sick employees of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(3):435–445. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-5948-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. Wet Verbetering Poortwachter: arboportaal; [cited 2020 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.arboportaal.nl/onderwerpen/wet-verbetering-poortwachter.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Singhal A, Quinlan MM. Diffusion of innovations. An integrated approach to communication theory and research. NY: Routledge. 2014; 432–448.
   Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedtke C, De Rijk A, Van den Broeck A, et al. Employers’ experience on involvement in sickness absence/return to work support for employees with cancer in small enterprises. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(4):635–645. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09887-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen KS, Momsen AH, Stapelfeldt CM, et al. Reintegrating employees undergoing cancer treatment into the workplace: a qualitative study of employer and Co-worker perspectives. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):764–772. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09838-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rijk A, Amir Z, Cohen M, et al. The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health. J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14(2):188–199. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson DH, Sainfort F, Eichler M, et al. Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(2):751–776. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiweis B, Pobiruchin M, Strotbaum V, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of eHealth services: systematic literature analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(11):e14197. doi: 10.2196/14197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetler CB. Updating the stetler model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nurs Outlook. 2001;49(6):272–279. doi: 10.1067/mno.2001.120517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelvis R, Wiezer NM, Blatter BM, et al. Evaluating the implementation process of a participatory organizational level occupational health intervention in schools. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3869-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rijk A. Work disability prevention in The Netherlands: a key role for employers. In: MacEachen E, editor. The science and politics of work disability prevention. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2018. p. 223–241.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg A, Hudson JH, Pearson A, et al. Organizational uptake of NICE guidance in promoting employees’ psychological health. Occup Med. 2019;69(1):47–53. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqy148.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson S, Hicks B, Stevens H. Scoping the development of work and cancer support for SMEs. Executive summary. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies; 2012. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kristman VL, Shaw WS, Boot CR, et al. Researching complex and Multi-Level workplace factors affecting disability and prolonged sickness absence. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):399–416. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9660-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar