Reliability of a multidimensional questionnaire for adults with treated complete cleft lip and palate

References

• Balogun J. Reliability and construct validity of the Body-cathexis Scale. Percept Mot Skills 1986; 62: 927–935.
   Google Scholar
• Becker M, Svensson H, Sarnds K-V, Jacobsson S. von Langenbeck or Wardill procedures for primary palatal repair in patients with isolated cleft palate-speech results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2000; 34: 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn S, Burney PGJ. On measuring repeatabil-ity of data from self-administered questionnaires. Int J Epidemiol 1987; 16: 121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measure-ment 1960; 20: 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agree-ment with provision for scaled disagreement of partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70: 213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR, Cleary PA. Factorial invariance across gender for the primary symptom dimen-sions of the SCL-90. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1977; 16: 347–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med 1983; 13: 595–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry 1976; 128: 280–289.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992; 6: 301–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egermark-Eriksson I, Kahnberg KE, Ridell A. Longitidunal study of function and dysfunction in the stomatognathic system after maxillary osteot-omy with anterior-inferior repositioning of the maxilla. Cranio 1988; 6: 239–244.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark H, Bolund S, Jorgensen I. Evaluation of unilateral cleft lip and palate treatment: long term results. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 354–361.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1986: 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Franzoi SL, Shields SA. The body esteem scale: multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. J Pers Assess 1984; 48: 173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier R, Wittstock C. Psychosocial studies of surgically treated adults with unilateral total lip-maxilla-palate clefts. Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol 1986; 38: 656–661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glass L, Starr CD. A study of relationships between judgements of speech and appearance of patients with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate J 1979; 16: 436–440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagberg C, Larson O, Milerad J. Incidence of cleft lip and palate and risks of additional malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998; 35: 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson T-G. Cleft lip and palate in Sweden: a genetic and clinical investigation. Thesis. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Sweden, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Hörnquist J- O. The concept of quality of life. Scand J Soc Med 1982; 10: 57–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hörnquist J- O. Quality of life: concept and assessment. Scand J Soc Med 1989; 18: 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hörnquist J- O, Wikby A, Hansson B, Andersson P- O. Quality of life: status and change (QLsc) reliability, validity and sensitivity of a generic assessment approach tailored for diabetes. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Kiyak HA, Zeitler DL. Self-assessment of profile and body-image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 46: 365–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel M, Wahlmann U, Wagner W. Nasal airway in cleft-palate patients: acoustic rhino-metric data. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997; 25: 270–274.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Bio-metrics 1977; 33: 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD centers using research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996; 10: 240–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• List T, Helkimo M. A scale for measuring the activities of daily living (ADL) of patients with craniomandibular disorders. Swed Dent J 1995; 19: 33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merskey H. Variable meanings for the definition of disease. J Med Philos 1998; 11: 215–232.
   Google Scholar
• Noar JH. Questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of patients with cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramstad T, Ottem E, Shaw WC. Psychosocial adjustment in Norwegian adults who had under-gone standardised treatment of complete cleft lip and palate. I. Education, employment and marriage. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29: 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Ramstad T, Ottem E, Shaw WC. Psychosocial adjustment in Norwegian adults who had under-gone standardised treatment of complete cleft lip and palate. II. Self-reported problems and con-cerns with appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29: 329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 1953; 17: 343–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stegenga B, de Bont LG, Boering G. Temporo-mandibular joint pain assessment. J Orofacial Pain 1993; 7: 23–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Tanne K, Tanaka E, Sakuda M. Association between malocclusion and temporomandibular disorders in orthodontic patients before treat-ment. J Orofacial Pain 1993; 7: 156–162.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas PT, Turner SR, Rumsey N, Dowell T, Sandy JR. Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 226–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner SR, Rumsey N, Sandy JR. Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 407–415.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporoman-dibular disorders in children and adolescents: reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examina-tion, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998; 12: 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Warren DW, Drake AF. Cleft nose. Form and function. Clin Plast Surg 1993; 20: 769–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar