143
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Medical Devices

The impact of abdominal compression devices on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1247-1256 | Received 05 May 2023, Accepted 28 Jul 2023, Published online: 18 Aug 2023

References

  • Abuelazm M, Mohamed I, Jaber FS, et al. Cold versus hot snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Gastroenterol. [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L640327727&from=export%0A doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001837.
  • Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(2):190–204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.190.
  • Millien VO, Mansour NM. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in 2020: a look at the past, present, and future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(6):28. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4.
  • Richardson LC, King JB, Thomas CC, et al. Adults who have never been screened for colorectal cancer, behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2012 and 2020. Prev Chronic Dis. 2022;19:e21. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.220001.
  • Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(4):721–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00494.x.
  • Kozan R, Yilmaz TU, Baştuǧral U, et al. Factors affecting successful colonoscopy procedures: single-center experience. Turkish J Surg. 2018;34(1):28–32.
  • Matyja M, Pasternak A, Szura M, et al. Cecal intubation rates in different eras of endoscopic technological development. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018;13(1):67–73. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.74341.
  • Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Chou AL. Patient self-administered abdominal pressure to reduce loop formation during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(5):1429–1433. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0876-3.
  • Bruce M, Choi JH. Detection of endoscopic looping during colonoscopy procedure by using embedded bending sensors. Med Devices. 2018;11:171–191. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S146934.
  • Singh R, Neo EN, Nordeen N, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(25):3250–3253.
  • Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Higuchi H, et al. Effects of encircled abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(1):11.
  • Crockett SD, Cirri HO, Kelapure R, et al. Use of an abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(6):850.e3–857.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.039.
  • Schulman AR, Ryou M, Chan WW. A novel hands-free abdominal compression device for colonoscopy significantly decreases cecal intubation time: a prospective single-blinded pilot study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(6):564–570. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0649.
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
  • Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2019. pp. 1–694. doi: 10.1002/9781119536604.
  • Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336(7651):995–998. [cited 2021 Dec 23Available from:/labs/pmc/articles/PMC2364804/ doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE.
  • Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.
  • RevMan | Cochrane Training. [cited 2021 August 3]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman.
  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, et al. Comprehensive meta‐analysis software. In: Introduction to meta‐analysis. Wiley; 2021. pp. 425–441.
  • Goksoy B, Kiyak M. The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021;56(8):990–997. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1941238.
  • Liu TT, Meng YT, Xiong F, et al. Impact of an abdominal compression bandage on the completion of colonoscopy for obese adults: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;2022:6010367.
  • Özkan ZK, Findik ÜY, Albayrak D. The impact of wearing an abdominal corset to achieve compression on colonoscopy outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Gastrointest Nurs. 2021;19(Suppl 2):S18–S23. doi: 10.12968/gasn.2021.19.Sup2.S18.
  • Toros AB, Ersoz F, Ozcan O. Does a fitted abdominal corset makes colonoscopy more tolerable? Dig Endosc. 2012;24(3):164–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01207.x.
  • Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Sakitani K, et al. Colonoscopy using back brace support belt: a randomized, prospective trial. JGH Open. 2020;4(3):441–445. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12276.
  • Yu GQ, Huang XM, Li HY, et al. Use of an abdominal obstetric binder in colonoscopy: a randomized, prospective trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(7):1365–1369. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14077.
  • Anderson JC, Butterly LF. Colonoscopy: quality indicators. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6(2):e77.
  • von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, et al. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(3):574–580. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.021.
  • Khashab MA, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Colorectal anatomy in adults at computed tomography colonography: normal distribution and the effect of age, sex, and body mass index. Endoscopy. 2009;41(8):674–678. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214899.
  • Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Serviddio G, et al. Factors associated with recurrence of advanced colorectal adenoma after endoscopic resection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(8):1148.e4–1154.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.017.
  • Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino RV, et al. Comparative efficacy of colonoscope distal attachment devices in increasing rates of adenoma detection: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(8):1209–1219.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.007.
  • Thayalasekaran S, Bhandari P. Distal attachments on a colonoscope: not all the same? Endosc Int Open. 2019;7(12):E1592–E1594. doi: 10.1055/a-0996-8298.
  • Ball AJ, Rees CJ, Corfe BM, et al.Sedation practice and comfort during colonoscopy: lessons learnt from a national screening programme. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(6):741–746.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.