1,351
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular Medicine

Comparative outcomes associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin use in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation or acute venous thromboembolism managed in the United States: a systematic review of observational studies

ORCID Icon, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1183-1194 | Received 14 Jul 2023, Accepted 10 Aug 2023, Published online: 24 Aug 2023

References

  • Gregson J, Kaptoge S, Bolton T, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(2):163–173. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4537.
  • Kim TH, Yang PS, Yu HT, et al. Age threshold for ischemic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2018;49(8):1872–1879. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021047.
  • Mitrousi K, Lip GYH, Apostolakis S. Age as a risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation patients: implications in thromboprophylaxis in the era of novel oral anticoagulants. J Atr Fibrillation. 2013;6(1):783. doi: 10.4022/jafib.783.
  • Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Wojdyla DM, et al. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Circulation. 2014;130(2):138–146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005008.
  • Prins MH, Lensing AW, Bauersachs R, et al. Oral rivaroxaban versus standard therapy for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and PE randomized studies. Thromb J. 2013;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-11-21.
  • Franklin JM, Patorno E, Desai RJ, et al. Emulating randomized clinical trials with nonrandomized Real-World evidence studies. Circulation. 2021;143(10):1002–1013. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051718.
  • Wang SV, Schneeweiss S, Franklin JM, RCT-DUPLICATE Initiative., et al. Emulation of randomized clinical trials with nonrandomized database analyses: results of 32 clinical trials. JAMA. 2023;329(16):1376–1385. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4221.
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
  • Dreyer NA, Schneeweiss S, McNeil BJ, et al. GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(6):467–471.
  • Weeda ER, Nguyen E, Martin S, et al. The impact of non-medical switching among ambulatory patients: an updated systematic literature review. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2019;7(1):1678563. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2019.1678563.
  • Alcusky M, Tjia J, McManus DD, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants versus warfarin: a national cohort study of nursing home residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(8):2329–2337. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05777-3.
  • Amin A, Keshishian A, Trocio J, et al. Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(9):1595–1604. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1345729.
  • Amin A, Keshishian A, Dina O, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019;48(2):240–249. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5.
  • Amin A, Garcia Reeves AB, Li X, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in older adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213614.
  • Amin A, Keshishian A, Hines DM, et al. Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States medicare population: updated analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38(12):2131–2140. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2115772.
  • Briasoulis A, Inampudi C, Akintoye E, et al. Safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8):e008773. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008773.
  • Coleman CI, Turpie AGG, Bunz TJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail patients with venous thromboembolism. Am J Med. 2018;131(8):933–938.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.02.015.
  • Coleman CI, Weeda ER, Nguyen E, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients 80+ years of age with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018;4(4):328–329. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx044.
  • Coleman CI, Baker WL, Meinecke AK, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and coronary or peripheral artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6(3):159–166. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz047.
  • Coleman CI, Costa OS, Brescia CW, et al. A RIVA-DM subanalysis investigating patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes aged under versus over 80 years. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022;28:10760296221133083. doi: 10.1177/10760296221133083.
  • Costa OS, Beyer-Westendorf J, Ashton V, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese patients with acute venous thromboembolism: analysis of electronic health record data. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021;51(2):349–358. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02199-0.
  • Costa OS, Beyer-Westendorf J, Ashton V, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: analysis of electronic health record data. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(7):1081–1088. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1762554.
  • Deitelzweig S, Keshishian A, Li X, et al. Comparisons between oral anticoagulants among older nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(8):1662–1671. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15956.
  • Graham DJ, Baro E, Zhang R, et al. Comparative stroke, bleeding, and mortality risks in older Medicare patients treated with oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019;132(5):596–604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.023.
  • Hernandez I, Zhang Y, Saba S. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(10):1813–1819. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.092.
  • Kim DH, Pawar A, Gagne JJ, et al. Frailty and clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in older adults with atrial fibrillation : a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(9):1214–1223. doi: 10.7326/M20-7141.
  • Lip GYH, Keshishian A, Li X, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Stroke. 2018;49(12):2933–2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232.
  • Lip GYH, Keshishian AV, Kang AL, et al. Oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in frail elderly patients: insights from the ARISTOPHANES study. J Intern Med. 2021;289(1):42–52. doi: 10.1111/joim.13140.
  • Lutsey PL, Norby FL, Zakai NA, et al. Oral anticoagulation therapy and subsequent risk of vnous thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(5):837–845. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1541445.
  • Martinez BK, Sood NA, Bunz TJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in frail patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
  • Mehta HB, An H, Ardeshirrouhanifard S, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin among adults with cancer and atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15(12):e008951. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.008951.
  • Mentias A, Heller E, Vaughan Sarrazin M. Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with polypharmacy. Stroke. 2020;51(7):2076–2086. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029541.
  • Norby FL, Bengtson LGS, Lutsey PL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0672-5.
  • Pawar A, Gagne JJ, Gopalakrishnan C, et al. Association of type of oral anticoagulant dispensed with adverse clinical outcomes in patients extending anticoagulation therapy beyond 90 days after hospitalization for venous thromboembolism. JAMA. 2022;327(11):1051–1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1920.
  • Palamaner Subash Shantha G, Bhave PD, Girotra S, et al. Sex-Specific comparative effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(4):e003418. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003418.
  • Sood N, Ashton V, Bessada Y, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with concomitant obstructive sleep apnea. TH Open. 2023;7(1):e82–e93. doi: 10.1055/a-2013-3346.
  • Weir MR, Ashton V, Moore KT, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kidney disease. Am Heart J. 2020;223:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.01.010.
  • Wong JM, Maddox TM, Kennedy K, et al. Comparing major bleeding risk in outpatients with atrial fibrillation or flutter by oral anticoagulant type (from the national cardiovascular disease registry’s practice innovation and clinical excellence registry). Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(10):1500–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.028.
  • Zakai NA, Walker RF, MacLehose RF, et al. Venous thrombosis recurrence risk according to warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of venous thrombosis. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021;5(6):e12575. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12575.
  • Santschi V, Chiolero A, Colosimo AL, et al. Improving blood pressure control through pharmacist interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(2):e000718. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000718.
  • Doni K, Bühn S, Weise A, et al. Safety outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants in older adults with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of (subgroup analyses from) randomized controlled trials. Geroscience. 2023; doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00825-2.
  • Almutairi AR, Zhou L, Gellad WF, et al. Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Ther. 2017;39(7):1456–1478.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.358.
  • Briere JB, Bowrin K, Millier A, et al. Number needed to treat based on real-world evidence for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Med Econ. 2019;22(8):760–765. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1606001.
  • Mittal VS, Wu B, Song J, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin in skilled nursing facilities: a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(4):529–536. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1706464.
  • Mahajan D, Wu B, Song J, et al. Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and costs between rivaroxaban and warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in a skilled nursing facility setting. Drugs Aging. 2020;37(4):281–289. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00737-x.