Use of in vitro fertilization—ethical issues

References

• Biggers JD. IVF and embryo transfer: historical origin and development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:118–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benatar D. Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Falster K, Hanly M, Banks E, Lynch J, Chambers G, Brownell M. Maternal age and offspring developmental vulnerability at age five: a population-based cohort study of Australian children. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Council on Medical Ethics. Assisterad befruktning - etiska aspekter [Assisted reproduction––ethical aspects]. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: http://www.smer.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Smer_rapport_2013_1_webb.pdf [Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Rekommendation om enhetlighet i landstingens och regionernas erbjudande av offentlig finansierad assisterad befruktning [Recommendations on uniformity in regional availability of publicly financed assisted reproduction]. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://skl.se/download/18.3f360f81154baabbb531975d/1464005701156/SKL-Rekommendation-assisterad-befruktning-forslag-20160419.pdf [Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Women over 38. 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/i-am/women-over-38/.
   Google Scholar
• Ilioi EC, Golombok S. Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:84–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busardo FP, Gulino M, Napoletano S, Zaami S, Frati P. The evolution of legislation in the field of Medically Assisted Reproduction and embryo stem cell research in European Union members. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:307160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Values Survey. Data & Documentation. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1524–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad A. Life after death: the ethics of posthumous gamete use. BioNews. 2011;625. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_93200.
   Google Scholar
• Gholipour B. Making babies after death: it’s possible, but is it ethical? Sci American. 2013; [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/making-babies-after-death/.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. Evans v United Kingdom. [cited 2019 Jul 16]. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evans_v_United_Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Braude P, Pickering S, Flinter F, Ogilvie CM. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:941–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson JA. Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate. Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:465–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. 10. Embryo testing and sex selection. 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/10.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Schoolcraft W, Strom C, Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching. JAMA. 2001;285:3130–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayefsky MJ. Comparative preimplantation genetic diagnosis policy in Europe and the USA and its implications for reproductive tourism. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;3:41–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Approved PGD and PTT conditions. 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/treatments/embryo-testing-and-treatments-for-disease/approved-pgd-and-ptt-conditions/.
   Google Scholar
• Duguet AM, Boyer-Beviere B. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the situation in France and in other European countries. Eur J Health Law. 2017;24:160–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puppinckes G. Costa and Pavan vs. Italy and the convergence between human rights and biotechnologies. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://eclj.org/eugenics/echr/-italie-et-la-convergence-des-droits-de-lhomme-et-des-biotechnologies.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2689–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borovecki A, Tozzo P, Cerri N, Caenazzo L. Social egg freezing under public health perspective: just a medical reality or a women's right? An ethical case analysis. J Public Health Res. 2018;7:1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi-Rafid S, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:154–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Egg sharing. 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/donation/donors/egg-sharing/.
   Google Scholar
• Shenfield F, Pennings G, Cohen J, Devroey P, de Wert G, Tarlatzis B. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 10: Surrogacy. Human Reprod. 2005;20:2705–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumit J, Drugs for life: how pharmaceutical companies define our health. Durham: Duke University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Asplund K. Ethical issues in healthcare prioritization: a medical viewpoint. Br J Urol. 1995;76:49–54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mladovsky P, Sorenson C. Public financing of IVF: a review of policy rationales. Health Care Anal. 2010;18:113–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchartwatnachai C, Wongkularb A, Srisombut C, Choktanasiri W, Chinsomboon S, Rojanasakul A. Cost-effectiveness of IVF in women 38 years and older. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;69:143–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spar D. Reproductive tourism and the regulatory map. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:531–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Magli MC, Sgargi S. Current regulatory arrangements for assisted conception treatment in European countries. Eur J Obst Gynec Reprod Biol. 2016;207:211–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris K, Burley H, McLachlan R, Bowman M, Macaldowie A, Taylor K, et al. Socio-economic disparities in access to assisted reproductive technologies in Australia. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:575–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemetti R, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Equity in the use of IVF in Finland in the late 1990s. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32:203–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation. Replies to certain questions of the day. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Sallam HN, Sallam NH. Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016;8:33–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serour GI. Ethical issues in human reproduction: Islamic perspectives. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:949–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S. Reproductive technologies as population control: how pronatalist policies harm reproductive health in South Korea. Sexual Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27:1610278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rigsby D. “Be fruitful and multiply”: The role of Israeli pronatalist policy in the pursuit of Jewish demographic dominance in the Holy Land. The Yale Review of International Studies. 2018. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available at: http://yris.yira.org/essays/2385.
   Google Scholar