Psychosocial aspects of identity-release gamete donation – perspectives of donors, recipients, and offspring

References

• Stoll J. Swedish donor offspring and their legal right to information. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, et al. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:450–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck U, Vandermeeren M, Vanderschueren D, Enzlin P, Demyttenaere K, D'Hooghe T. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:37–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok S. Parenting in new family forms. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;15:76–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:601–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzi E, Accordini M, Facchin F. ‘Is blood thicker than water?’ Donor conceived offspring’s subjective experiences of the donor: a systematic narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38:797–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz R, Nelson MK, Kramer W. Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: the relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Soc Sci Med. 2013;86:52–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos HM, Gartrell NK. Adolescents of the US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study: the impact of having a known or an unknown donor on the stability of psychological adjustment. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:630–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalos A, Daniels K, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:212–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekerhovd E, Faurskov A, Werner C. Swedish sperm donors are driven by altruism, but shortage of sperm donors leads to reproductive travelling. Ups J Med Sci. 2008;113:305–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Geijerwall AL, Gudmundsson J, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, et al. Gamete donors’ motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:944–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla U, Deval B, Jansa Perez M, Hamoda H, Savvas M, Narvekar N. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices–5 years after the removal of donor anonymity. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:676–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila V, Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Poranen AK, Salevaara M, et al. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs DW, Russell L. Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:266–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley A. ‘One of the good guys’: sperm donor masculinity and the falling Danish sperm count discourse. Cult Health Sex. 2019;21:495–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman L. Toxic money or paid altruism: the meaning of payments for identity-release gamete donors. Sociol Health Illn. 2018;40:702–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brändström S, Schlette P, Przybeck TR, Lundberg M, Forsgren T, Sigvardsson S, et al. Swedish normative data on personality using the Temperament and Character Inventory. Compr Psychiatry. 1998;39:122–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjo G, Lampic C, Brandstrom S, Gudmundsson J, Karlstrom PO, Solensten NG, et al. Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors. BJOG. 2012;119:33–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjo G, Lampic C, Brandstrom S, Gudmundsson J, Karlstrom PO, Solensten NG, et al. Personality characteristics in a Swedish national sample of identifiable oocyte donors. BJOG. 2011;118:1067–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Lalos A, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. Semen providers and their three families. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;26:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari AM, Söderström-Anttila V. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:672–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjo G, Lampic C, Bladh M, Svanberg AS. Oocyte and sperm donors’ opinions on the acceptable number of offspring. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:634–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjo G. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1978–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson S, Sydsjo G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1160–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S, Jadva V, Freeman T, Ahuja K, Golombok S. Being an identity-release donor: a qualitative study exploring the motivations, experiences and future expectations of current UK egg donors. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016;19:230–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib JE, Ruby A, Benward J. Who requests their sperm donor’s identity? The first ten years of information releases to adults with open-identity donors. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:483–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Gejerwall AL, Gudmundsson J, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, et al. Gamete donors’ satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:1049–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser M, Mochtar MH, de Melker AA, van der Veen F, Repping S, Gerrits T. Psychosocial counselling of identifiable sperm donors. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1066–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib JE, Riordan M, Rubin S. Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13-18 years later. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1115–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartrell NK, Bos H, Goldberg NG, Deck A, van Rijn-van Gelderen L. Satisfaction with known, open-identity, or unknown sperm donors: reports from lesbian mothers of 17-year-old adolescents. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:242–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad F, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. To tell or not to tell–what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalos A, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinking. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1759–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb-Lundberg S, Kjellberg S, Sydsjö G. Helping parents to tell their children about the use of donor insemination (DI) and determining their opinions about open-identity sperm donors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson S, Sydsjo G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2998–3007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson S, Skoog-Svanberg A, Sydsjo G, Linell L, Lampic C. It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:125–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman T, Zadeh S, Smith V, Golombok S. Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;33:592–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson S, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjo G, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Karlstrom PO, Solensten NG, et al. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Hum Reprod. 2011;26:853–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples’ attitudes. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2052–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu A, Lampic C. The interaction between donor-conceived families and their environment: parents’ perceptions of societal understanding and attitudes regarding their family-building. Hum Fertil (Camb). Forthcoming. [2018 Nov 2]:[1–10].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C. Managing absence and presence of child-parent resemblance: a challenge for heterosexual couples following sperm donation. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019;8:38–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zadeh S, Freeman T, Golombok S. Absence or presence? Complexities in the donor narratives of single mothers using sperm donation. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:117–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjo G, Svanberg AS, Bladh M, Lampic C. Relationships in couples treated with sperm donation - a national prospective follow-up study. Reprod Health. 2014;11:62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Bladh M, Skoog Svanberg A. Relationships in oocyte recipient couples - a Swedish national prospective follow-up study. Reprod Health. 2014;11:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borneskog C, Lampic C, Sydsjo G, Bladh M, Svanberg AS. Relationship satisfaction in lesbian and heterosexual couples before and after assisted reproduction: a longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borneskog C, Lampic C, Sydsjö G, Bladh M, Skoog Svanberg A. How do lesbian couples compare with heterosexual in vitro fertilization and spontaneously pregnant couples when it comes to parenting stress? Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:537–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelgren Engstrom H, Haggstrom-Nordin E, Borneskog C, Almqvist AL. Mothers in same-sex relationships describe the process of forming a family as a stressful journey in a heteronormative world: a Swedish grounded theory study. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22:1444–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelgren Engström H, Häggström-Nordin E, Borneskog C, Almqvist AL. Mothers in same-sex relationships-Striving for equal parenthood: a grounded theory study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:3700–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt AJ, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Indekeu A, Lampic C. Parenting stress and its association with perceived agreement about the disclosure decision in parents following donor conception. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:968–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib JE, Ruby A. Contact among families who share the same sperm donor. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg AE, Scheib JE. Female-partnered and single women’s contact motivations and experiences with donor-linked families. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1375–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg AE, Scheib JE. Female-partnered women conceiving kinship: does sharing a sperm donor mean we are family? J Lesbian Stud. 2016;20:427–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib JE, Riordan M, Rubin S. Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:239–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos H, van Rijn-van Gelderen L, Gartrell N. Self-esteem and problem behavior in Dutch adolescents conceived through sperm donation in planned lesbian parent families. J Lesbian Stud. Forthcoming. [2019 Jun 20]:[1–15].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampic C, Lessons from three decades of non-anonymity. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; 2019 Jun 23–26; Vienna, Austria. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker O. A review of family donor constructs: current research and future directions. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson D, Jennings P, Kramer W. A new path to grandparenthood: parents of sperm and egg donors. J Fam Stud. 2013;34:1295–316.
   Google Scholar
• Harper JC, Kennett D, Reisel D. The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1135–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh S. Disclosure of donor conception in the era of non-anonymity: safeguarding and promoting the interests of donor-conceived individuals? Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2416–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar