10,465
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 167-174 | Received 18 Nov 2019, Accepted 18 Dec 2019, Published online: 22 Jan 2020

References

  • Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlström P, Tydén T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:558–64.
  • Virtala A, Vilska S, Huttunen T, Kunttu K. Childbearing, the desire to have children, and awareness about the impact of age on female fertility among Finnish university students. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:108–15.
  • Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1375–82.
  • Sørensen NO, Marcussen S, Backhausen MG, Juhl M, Schmidt L, Tydén T, et al. Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students. Reprod Health. 2016;13:146.
  • Almeida-Santos T, Melo C, Macedo A, Moura-Ramos M. Are women and men well informed about fertility? Childbearing intentions, fertility knowledge and information-gathering sources in Portugal. Reprod Health. 2017;14:91.
  • Tydén T, Svanberg AS, Karlström P-O, Lihoff L, Lampic C. Female university students’ attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:181–9.
  • Eriksson C, Larsson M, Skoog Svanberg A, Tydén T. Reflections on fertility and postponed parenthood—interviews with highly educated women and men without children in Sweden. Ups J Med Sci. 2013;118:122–9.
  • UNICEF. Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Estonia and Portugal rank highest for family-friendly policies in OECD and EU countries [Internet]. UNICEF press release; 12 June 2019. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/sweden-norway-iceland-and-estonia-rank-highest-family-friendly-policies-oecd-and-eu
  • Eurostat. Being young in Europe today. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6776245/KS-05-14-031-EN-N.pdf/18bee6f0-c181-457d-ba82-d77b314456b9
  • Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1548–53.
  • Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Leridon H, te Velde ER. Realizing a desired family size: when should couples start? Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2215–21.
  • Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Karlström PO, Tydén T. Attitudes toward parenthood and awareness of fertility among postgraduate students in Sweden. Gend Med. 2006;3:187–95.
  • Sobotka T. In pursuit of higher education, do we postpone parenthood too long? Gend Med. 2006;3:183–6.
  • Aitken RJ, Koopman P, Lewis S. Seeds of concern. Nature. 2004;432:48–52.
  • Eriksson C, Larsson M, Tydén T. Reflections on having children in the future—interviews with highly educated women and men without children. Ups J Med Sci. 2012;117:328–35.
  • Sylvest R, Koert E, Vittrup I, Birch Petersen K, Andersen AN, Pinborg A, et al. Status one year after fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age—a qualitative study. Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123:254–70.
  • García D, Brazal S, Rodríguez A, Prat A, Vassena R. Knowledge of age-related fertility decline in women: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:109–18.
  • Pedro J, Brandão T, Schmidt L, Costa ME, Martins MV. What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors. Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123:71–81.
  • Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn M, Boehm J, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Hum Reprod. 2016;32:403–11.
  • Nouri K, Huber D, Walch K, Promberger R, Buerkle B, Ott J, et al. Fertility awareness among medical and non-medical students: a case-control study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:94.
  • Warner C, Carlson S, Crichlow R, Ross MW. Sexual health knowledge of U.S. medical students: a national survey. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1093–102.
  • Vujčić I, Radičević T, Dubljanin E, Maksimović N, Grujičić S. Serbian medical students’ fertility awareness and attitudes towards future parenthood. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2017;22:291–7.
  • Mogilevkina I, Stern J, Melnik D, Getsko E, Tydén T. Ukrainian medical students’ attitudes to parenthood and knowledge of fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2016;21:189–94.
  • Alfaraj S, Aleraij S, Morad S, Alomar N, Al Rajih H, Alhussain H, et al. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes toward parenthood among female health professions students in Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2019;13:34–9.
  • Anspach Will E, Maslow BS, Kaye L, Nulsen J. Increasing awareness of age-related fertility and elective fertility preservation among medical students and house staff: a pre- and post-intervention analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1200–5.
  • Szűcs M, Bitó T, Csíkos C, Párducz Szöllősi A, Furau C, Blidaru I, et al.; on behalf of The Scientific Group of the orating centres. Knowledge and attitudes of female university students on menstrual cycle and contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37:210–4.
  • Moos M-K, Dunlop AL, Jack BW, Nelson L, Coonrod DV, Long R, et al. Healthier women, healthier reproductive outcomes: recommendations for the routine care of all women of reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:280–9.
  • Jack BW, Atrash H, Coonrod DV, Moos MK, O’Donnell J, Johnson K. The clinical content of preconception care: an overview and preparation of this supplement. Am J Obst Gyn. 2008;199:266–79.
  • Stern J, Bodin M, Grandahl M, Segeblad B, Axen L, Larsson M, et al. Midwives’ adoption of the reproductive life plan in contraceptive counselling: a mixed methods study. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1146–55.
  • Stern J, Larsson M, Kristiansson P, Tydén T. Introducing reproductive life plan-based information in contraceptive counselling: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2450–61.
  • Bodin M, Tydén T, Käll L, Larsson M. Can Reproductive Life Plan-based counseling increase men’s fertility awareness? Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123:255–63.
  • Skogsdal Y, Fadl H, Cao Y, Karlsson J, Tydén T. An intervention in contraceptive counseling increased the knowledge about fertility and awareness of preconception health—a randomized controlled trial. Ups J Med Sci. 2019;124:203–12.
  • Dunlop AL, Logue KM, Miranda MC, Narayan DA. Integrating reproductive planning with primary health care: an explanation among low-income, minority women and men. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2010;1:37–43.
  • Mittal P, Dandekar A, Hessler D. Use of a modified reproductive life plan to improve awareness of preconception health in women with chronic disease. Perm J. 2014;18:28–32.
  • Bommaraju A, Malat J, Mooney JL. Reproductive life plan counseling and effective contraceptive use among urban women utilizing title X services. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25:209–15.
  • Fooladi E, Weller C, Salehi M, Rezaee Abhari F, Stern J. Using reproductive life plan-based information in a primary health care center increased Iranian women’s knowledge of fertility, but not their future fertility plan: a randomized, controlled trial. Midwifery 2018;67:77–86.
  • Robbins CL, Gavin L, Carter MW, Moskosky SB. The link between reproductive life plan assessment and provision of preconception care at publicly funded health centres. Perspect Sex Repro H. 2017;49:167–72.
  • Tydén T, Verbiest S, Van Achterberg T, Larsson M, Stern J. Using the Reproductive Life Plan in contraceptive counselling. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;121:299–303.
  • Hvidman HW, Petersen KB, Larsen EC, Macklon KT, Pinborg A, Andersen AN. Individual fertility assessment and pro-fertility counselling; should this be offered to women and men of reproductive age? Hum Rep. 2015;30:9–15.
  • Petersen KB, Maltesen T, Forman JL, Sylvest R, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, et al. The fertility assessment and counseling clinic—does the concept work? A prospective 2-year follow-up study of 519 women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:313–25.
  • Donnelly KZ, Foster TC, Thompson R. What matters most? The content and concordance of patients’ and providers’ information priorities for contraceptive decision making. Contraception. 2014;90:280–7.
  • Garbers S, Falletta KA, Srinivasulu S, Almonte Y, Baum R, Bermudez D, et al. “If you don’t ask, I’m not going to tell you”: using community-based participatory research to inform pregnancy intention screening processes for black and Latina women in primary care. Womens Health Issues. 2020;30:25–34.
  • Agricola E, Gesualdo F, Pandolfi E, Gonfiantini MV, Carloni E, Mastroiacovo P, et al. Does googling for preconception care result in information consistent with international guidelines: a comparison of information found by Italian women of childbearing age and health professionals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:14.
  • Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e40.
  • Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e4.
  • Wojcieszek AM, Thompson R. Conceiving of change: a brief intervention increases young adults’ knowledge of fertility and the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:523–9.
  • Bunting L, Boivin J. Development and preliminary validation of the fertility status awareness tool: FertiSTAT. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1722–33.
  • Assisted reproductive technology (ART). Reproductive health. CDC. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/art/ivf-success-estimator/index.html
  • Ekstrand Ragnar M, Niemeyer Hultstrand J, Tydén T, Larsson M. Development of an evidence-based website on preconception health. Ups J Med Sci. 2018;123:116–22.
  • Andersson Tydén KM. T. Implementation of Reproductive Life Planning (RLP) in primary health care supported by an evidence-based website. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2019;28:1–7.
  • Boivin J, Koert E, Harris T, O’Shea L, Perryman A, Parker K, et al. An experimental evaluation of the benefits and costs of providing fertility information to adolescents and emerging adults. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1247–53.
  • Harper J. Launch of a global fertility education poster campaign. Global Women Connected; November 2019. Available from: http://www.globalwomenconnected.com/2019/10/fertility_ed/?sfns=mo
  • Stenhammar C, Ehrsson YT, Åkerud H, Larsson M, Tydén T. Sexual and contraceptive behavior among female university students in Sweden—repeated surveys over a 25-year period. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:253–9.
  • Tozzo P, Fassina A, Nespeca P, Spigarolo G, Caenazzo L. Understanding social oocyte freezing in Italy: a scoping survey on university female students’ awareness and attitudes. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2019;15:3.
  • Baldwin K, Culley L. Women’s experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and ‘going it alone’. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018. DOI:10.1080/14647273.2018.1522456
  • de Groot M, Dancet E, Repping S, Goddijn M, Stoop D, van der Veen F, et al. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1396–401.
  • Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal LM, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Patient-centered elective egg freezing: a binational qualitative study of best practices for women’s quality of care. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1081–90.
  • Client-centered reproductive goals & counseling flow chart. Do you think you might like to have (more) children at some point? Available from: https://www.fpntc.org/resources/client-centered-reproductive-goals-counseling-flow-chart