Surrogacy relationships: a critical interpretative review

References

• Ragoné H. Chasing the blood tie: surrogate mothers, adoptive mothers and fathers. American Ethnolo. 1996;23:352–65. doi:10.1525/ae.1996.23.2.02a00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotabi KS, Mapp S, Cheney K, Fong R, McRoy R. Regulating commercial global surrogacy: the best interests of the child. J Hum Rights Soc Work. 2017;3:64–73. doi:10.1007/s41134-017-0034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm U, Loft A, Pinborg A, Aittomäki K, Romundstad L, et al. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families-a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:260–76. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Akker O. Psychological trait and state characteristics, social support and attitudes to the surrogate pregnancy and baby. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2287–95. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelmann RJ. Surrogacy: the psychological issues. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2004;22:123–36. doi:10.1080/0264683042000205981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccarelli JC, Beckman LJ. Navigating rough waters: an overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. J Social Issues. 2005;61:21–43. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00392.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teman E. The social construction of surrogacy research: an anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1104–12. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby K, Vun D. Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale: feminist theory meets empirical research on surrogate mothers. Can J Fam Law. 2010;26:13–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey A. Reconceiving surrogacy: toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia. 2011;26:715–41. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. Reorienting the ethics of transnational surrogacy as a feminist pragmatist. Pluralist. 2010;5:107–27. doi:10.1353/plu.2010.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra S, Achieving reproductive justice in the international surrogacy market. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey J. Queer reproductive justice? Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018;7:4–7. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2018.06.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smietana M, Thompson C, Winddance Twine F. Making and breaking families: reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018;7:112–30. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Luna Z, Luker K. Reproductive justice. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2013;9:327–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan C, In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Dove ES, Kelly SE, Lucivero F, Machirori M, Dheensa S, Prainsack B. Beyond individualism: is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research? Clin Ethics. 2017;12:150–65. doi:10.1177/1477750917704156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDougall R. Reviewing literature in bioethics research: increasing rigour in non-systematic reviews. Bioethics 2015;29:523–8. doi:10.1111/bioe.12149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:6–35. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee A. Race and a transnational reproductive caste system: Indian transnational surrogacy. Hypatia 2014;29:113–28. doi:10.1111/hypa.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande A. Not an ‘angel’, not a ‘whore’: surrogates as ‘dirty’ workers in India. Indian J Gend Stud. 2009;16:141–73. doi:10.1177/097152150901600201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande A. Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: gifts for global sisters. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:618–25. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande A. Commercial surrogacy in India: manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs 2010;35:969–92. doi:10.1086/651043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande A. Blood, sweat and dummy tummies: kin labour and transnational surrogacy in India. Anthropologica 2015;57:53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar A. Nurturing an alien pregnancy: surrogate mothers, intended parents and disembodied relationships. Indian J Gend Stud. 2014;21:199–224. doi:10.1177/0971521514525087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar A. Conceptualizing surrogacy as work-labour: domestic labour in commercial gestational surrogacy in India. J South Asian Dev. 2018;13:210–27. doi:10.1177/0973174118778481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Schicktanz S. Failed surrogate conceptions: social and ethical aspects of preconception disruptions during commercial surrogacy in India. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2016;11:9. doi:10.1186/s13010-016-0040-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Prasad S. ‘Outsourced pregnancy’: surrogate narratives from Hyderabad. Contribut Indian Sociol. 2019;52:299–327. doi:10.1177/0069966719836883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deomampo D. Gendered geographies of reproductive tourism. Gender Society. 2013;27:514–37. doi:10.1177/0891243213486832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa S. What to expect when you’re expecting: the affective economies of consuming surrogacy in India. Positions: Asia Critique. 2016;24:281–302. doi:10.1215/10679847-3320149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan S. An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013;10:2–12. doi:10.1186/1747-5341-8-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vora K. Potential, risk, and return in transnational Indian gestational surrogacy. Cur Anthropol. 2013;54:S97–S106. doi:10.1086/671018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend Z. Surrogate losses: understandings of pregnancy loss and assisted reproduction among surrogate mothers. Med Anthropol Quart. 2010;24:240–62. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01099.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend Z. The romance of surrogacy. Sociol Forum. 2012;27:913–36. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend Z. ‘We are all carrying someone else’s child!’: relatedness and relationships in third-party reproduction. Am Anthropol. 2016;118:24–36. doi:10.1111/aman.12444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend Z, Guerzoni CS. Reshaping relatedness? The case of US surrogacy. Antropologica 2019;6:83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Teman E, Berend Z. Surrogate non-motherhood: Israeli and US surrogates speak about kinship and parenthood. Anthropol Med. 2018;25:296–310. doi:10.1080/13648470.2017.1401825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk HL. The legalization of emotion: managing risk by managing feelings in contracts for surrogate labor. Law Society Rev. 2015;49:143–77. doi:10.1111/lasr.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake L, Carone N, Slutsky J, Raffanello E, Ehrhardt AA, Golombok S. Gay father surrogacy families: relationships with surrogates and egg donors and parental disclosure of children’s origins. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1503–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohman MM, Hagan CB. Satisfaction with surrogate mothering. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2001;4:61–84. doi:10.1300/J137v04n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Smietana M. Affective de-commodifying, economic de-kinning: surrogates’ and gay fathers’ narratives in U.S. surrogacy. Sociol Res Online. 2017;22:163–13. doi:10.5153/sro.4312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teman E. The medicalization of ‘nature’ in the ‘artificial body’: surrogate motherhood in Israel. Med Anthropol Q. 2003;17:78–98. doi:10.1525/maq.2003.17.1.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teman E. Embodying surrogate motherhood: pregnancy as a dyadic body-project. Body and Society. 2009;15:47–69. doi:10.1177/1357034X09337780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teman E. The power of the single story: surrogacy and social media in Israel. Med Anthropol. 2019;38:282–94. doi:10.1080/01459740.2018.1532423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv I, Freund-Eschar Y. The pregnancy experience of gay couples expecting a child through overseas pregnancy. Family J. 2015;23:158–66. doi:10.1177/1066480714565107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaligoura Z, Papadatou D, Bellali T. Surrogacy: the experience of Greek commissioning women. Women and Birth. 2015;28:e110–18. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandi M, Zohreh V, Marziyeh S, Mohammadi E. Nine centuries waiting: the experiences of Iranian surrogacy commissioning mothers. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2014;19:224–32. doi:10.1111/jjns.12158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carone N, Baiocco R, Lingiardi V. Single fathers by choice using surrogacy: why men decide to have a child as a single parent. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1871–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovav A. Producing moral palatability in the Mexican surrogacy market. Gender Society. 2019;33:273–95. doi:10.1177/0891243218823344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr C, Militz E. The affective economy of transnational surrogacy. Environ Plan A. 2018;50:1626–45. doi:10.1177/0308518X18769652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuvøy I. Accounting for the money-made parenthood of transnational surrogacy. Anthropol Med. 2018;25:280–95. doi:10.1080/13648470.2017.1392100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson A, Johnsdotter S, Essén B. Views of Swedish commissioning parents relating to the exploitation discourse in using transnational surrogacy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson A, Johnsdotter S, Emmelin M, Essén B. Being questioned as parents: an interview study with Swedish commissioning parents using transnational surrogacy. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019;8:23–31. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegl V. Aligning the affective body: commercial surrogacy in Moscow and the emotional labour of “nastraivatsya” Tsantsa. J Swiss Anthropol Association. 2018;23:63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Siegl V. ‘The ultimate argument’: evoking the affective powers of ‘happiness’ in commercial surrogacy. Anthropol J Euro Cul. 2018;27:1–21. doi:10.3167/ajec.2018.270202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gezinski LB, Karandikar S, Huber S, Levitt A. Commissioning parents' experiences with international surrogacy: a qualitative study. Health Soc Work. 2018;43:175–84. doi:10.1093/hsw/hly018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledano SJ, Zeiler K. Hosting the other’s child? Relational work and embodied responsibility in altruistic surrogate motherhood. Feminist Theory. 2017;18:159–75. doi:10.1177/1464700117700048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie S, Jadva V. The longer-term experience of surrogates and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:424–35. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Readings J, Blake L, Casey P, Jadva V, Golombok S. Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:485–95. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar