Are we looking under the lamp although we know the lost key is somewhere else? Or is it just about the egg?

References

• Griesinger G. Is progress in clinical reproductive medicine happening fast enough? Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:65–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikland M, Enk L, Hammarberg K, Nilsson L. Use of a vaginal transducer for oocyte retrieval in an IVF/ET program. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15:245–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaegter KK, Lakic TG, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J. Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:641–8 e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez , KA, Anastacio A, Vonheim E, Deen S, Malmros J, Borgström B. Fertility preservation for young adults, adolescents and children with cancer. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:112–120.
   Google Scholar
• Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo, D, Petriglia C, Conforti A, Alviggi, C, Ubaldi N, et al. DuoStim: a reproducible strategy to obtain more oocytes and competent embryos in a short time-frame aimed at fertility preservation and IVF purposes. A systematic review. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo J, Haahr T, Martinez-Moya M, Humaidan P. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for ovulation trigger – OHSS prevention. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Celada P, Bosch E. Freeze-all, for whom, when and how. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Nardo LG, Chouliaras S. Adjuvants in IVF – evidence for what works and what does not work. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:144–151.
   Google Scholar
• Huang SY, Wang CJ, Soong YK, Wang HS, Wang ML, Lin CY, et al. Site-specific endometrial injury improves implantation and pregnancy in patients with repeated implantation failures. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvekar SA, Gupta N, Shetty N, Kottur A, Srinivas M, Rao KA. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF? A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010;3:15–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:215–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung TW, Chai J, Li RH, Lee VC, Ho PC, Ng EH. The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2474–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dain L, Ojha K, Bider D, Levron J, Zinchenko V, Walster S, et al. Effect of local endometrial injury on pregnancy outcomes in ovum donation cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1048–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aflatoonian A, Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, Baradaran Bagheri R, Hosseinisadat R. The effect of endometrial injury on pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized control trial. Ijrm. 2016;14:453–158.
   Google Scholar
• Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Lin L, Doan T, Chu H, Thalib L, et al. P value-driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensen S, Osavlyuk D, Armstrong S, Stadelmann C, Hennes A, Napier E, et al. A randomized trial of endometrial scratching before in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:325–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarze JE, Borda P, Vásquez P, Ortega C, Villa S, Crosby JA, et al. Is the risk of preeclampsia higher in donor oocyte pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod 2018;22:15–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoudian P, Nasr A, de Nanassy J, Fung-Kee-Fung K, Bainbridge SA, El Demellawy D. El Demellawy D. Oocyte donation pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:328–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savasi VM, Mandia L, Laoreti A, Cetin I. Maternal and fetal outcomes in oocyte donation pregnancies. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:620–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Versen-Höynck F, Schaub AM, Chi Y-Y, Chiu K-H, Liu J, Lingis M, et al. Increased preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum. Hypertension 2019;73:640–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh TB, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, et al. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1301–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson Payne J, Korolczuk E, Mezinska S. Surrogacy relationships: a critical interpretative review. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Bellver J, Bosch E, Espinós JJ, Fabregues F, Fontes J, García-Velasco J, et al. Second-generation preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in assisted reproduction: a SWOT analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:905–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund K. Use of IVF-ethical issues. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin K, Park H. Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerMilyea M, Hall JMM, Diakiw SM, Johnston A, Nguyen T, Perugini D, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Hum Reprod 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbaere I, Verbiest S, Tydén T. Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg AL. Social freezing of oocytes: a means to take control of your fertility. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125. doi:10.1080/03009734.2019.1707332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar