1,222
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The need to reconfigure consistency and variability to best manage changing flood risks in Aotearoa-New Zealand

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 473-490 | Received 28 Oct 2022, Accepted 01 May 2023, Published online: 06 Jun 2023

References

  • Adri N, Simon D. 2018. A tale of two groups: focusing on the differential vulnerability of “climate-induced” and “non-climate-induced” migrants in Dhaka City. Climate and Development. 10(4):321–336.
  • Anderson CL, Rovins J, Johnston DM, Lang W, Golding B, Mills B, Kaltenberger R, Chasco J, Pagano TC, Middleham R, et al. 2022. Connecting forecast and warning: a partnership between communicators and scientists. In: Golding B, editor. Towards the “perfect” weather warning: bridging disciplinary gaps through partnership and communication. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 87–113.
  • Bache I. 2012. Multi-level governance in the European Union. In: Levi-Faur D, editor. The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press; p. 628–641.
  • Bottazzi P, Winkler MS, Ifejika Speranza C. 2019. Flood governance for resilience in cities: the historical policy transformations in Dakar’s suburbs. Environmental Science & Policy. 93:172–180.
  • Bowen C-C, Bowen WM. 2008. Content analysis. In: Yang K, Miller GJ, editors. Handbook of research methods in public administration. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis; p. 689–704.
  • Carey-Smith T, Henderson R, Singh S. 2018. High intensity system design rainfall version 4. Wellington: National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research.
  • Collins D, Montgomery K, Zammit C. 2018. Hydrological projections for New Zealand rivers under climate change. Ministry for the Environment, N.Z.
  • Craig H, Paulik R, Djanibekov U, Walsh P, Wild A, Popovich B. 2021. Quantifying national-scale changes in agricultural land exposure to fluvial flooding. Sustainability. 13(22):12495.
  • Endreny TA, Noto LV, Semadeni-Davies A. 2018. Preface to the hydrological processes in urban environments: updates on urbanization, naturalization and climate change special issue. Hydrological Processes. 32(24):3572–3575. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13166.
  • European Union. 2007. Directive 2007/60/Ec of the European Parliament and of The Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks.
  • Fekete A, Hufschmidt G, Kruse S. 2014. Benefits and challenges of resilience and vulnerability for disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 5(1):3–20.
  • Fraser A, Pelling M, Scolobig A, Mavrogenis S. 2020. Relating root causes to local risk conditions: a comparative study of the institutional pathways to small-scale disasters in three urban flood contexts. Global Environmental Change. 63:102102.
  • Gray B, Eaton J, Christy J, Duncan J, Hanna F, Kasi S. 2021. A proactive approach: examples for integrating disaster risk reduction and mental health and psychosocial support programming. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 54:102051.
  • Hanna C, White I, Glavovic B. 2020. The uncertainty contagion: revealing the interrelated, cascading uncertainties of managed retreat. Sustainability. 12(2):736.
  • Hutchings J. 2022. Central government co-investment in flood protection schemes. Supplementary Report.
  • Hutchings J, Williams J, Lawson L. 2019. Central Government Co-investment in River Management for Flood Protection: Critical Adaptation to Climate Change for a More Resilient New Zealand.
  • Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ). 2022. Cost of natural hazards. [accessed 2022 Sept 28]. https://www.icnz.org.nz/natural-disasters/cost-of-natural-disasters/.
  • IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability – summary for policymakers. IPCC.
  • Kaufmann M. 2018. Limits to change – institutional dynamics of Dutch flood risk governance. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 11(3):250–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12307.
  • Kreibich H, Van Loon AF, Schröter K, Ward PJ, Mazzoleni M, Sairam N, Abeshu GW, Agafonova S, AghaKouchak A, Aksoy H, et al. 2022. The challenge of unprecedented floods and droughts in risk management. Nature. 608(7921):80–86.
  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science. 7(1):25–43.
  • Lawrence J, Blackett P, Cradock-Henry NA. 2020. Cascading climate change impacts and implications. Climate Risk Management.100234.
  • Lawrence J, Mackey B, Chiew F, Costello MJ, Hennessy K, Lansbury N, Nidumolu UB, Pecl G, Rickards L, Tapper N, et al. 2022. Australasia. In: H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor et al., editors. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; p. 1581–1588.
  • Local Government Act. 2002. New Zealand Government.
  • Mason K, Lindberg K, Haenfling C, Schori A, Marsters H, Read D, Borman B. 2021. Social vulnerability indicators for flooding in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(8):3952.
  • Meresa H, Murphy C, Fealy R, Golian S. 2021. Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 25:5237–5257. English.
  • Meresa H, Zhang Y, Tian J, Ma N, Zhang X, Heidari H, Naeem S. 2023. An integrated modeling framework in projections of hydrological extremes. Surveys in Geophysics. 44(2):277–322.
  • Ministry for the Environment. 2010. Preparing for future flooding: a guide for local government in New Zealand. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/preparing-for-future-flooding.pdf.
  • Ministry for the Environment. 2018. Climate change projections for New Zealand: atmosphere projections based on simulations from the IPCC fifth assessment. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
  • Ministry for the Environment. 2020. National climate change risk assessment for New Zealand – Arotakenga Tūraru mō te Huringa Āhuarangi o Āotearoa: technical report – Pūrongo whaihanga. Wellington.
  • Ministry for the Environment. Forthcoming 2022. Adapting to flood risk in Westport. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
  • Morrison A, Westbrook CJ, Noble BF. 2018. A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 11(3):291–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12315.
  • Moure M, Jacobsen JB, Smith-Hall C. 2023. Uncertainty and climate change adaptation: a systematic review of research approaches and people’s decision-making. Current Climate Change Reports. 9(1):1–26.
  • National Emergency Management Agency. 2023a. Auckland severe weather – what support is available and where can you get help. New Zealand Government. [accessed 2023 Mar 23]. https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/resources/news-and-events/news-and-events/auckland-severe-weather-what-support-is-available-and-where-can-you-get-help/.
  • National Emergency Management Agency. 2023b. National transition period – cyclone Gabrielle New Zealand Government. [accessed 2023 Mar 23]. https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/.
  • New Zealand Government. 2022a. National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020.
  • New Zealand Government. 2022b. Resource management (enabling housing supply and other matters) Amendment Act 2021.
  • Noll B, Filatova T, Need A, de Vries P. 2023. Uncertainty in individual risk judgments associates with vulnerability and curtailed climate adaptation. Journal of Environmental Management. 325:116462.
  • O’Hare P, White I. 2018. Beyond ‘just’ flood risk management: the potential for—and limits to—alleviating flood disadvantage. Regional Environmental Change. 18(2):385–396.
  • Parsons M, Fisher K. 2022. Decolonising flooding and risk management: indigenous peoples, settler colonialism, and memories of environmental injustices. Sustainability. 14(18):11127.
  • Pastor-Paz J, Noy I, Sin I, Sood A, Fleming-Munoz D, Owen S. 2020. Projecting the effect of climate change-induced increases in extreme rainfall on residential property damages: a case study from New Zealand. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research. 32.
  • Paulik R, Craig H, Collins D. 2019. New Zealand fluvial and pluvial flood exposure. NIWA Client Report prepared for The Deep South Challenge.
  • Plummer R, Baird J, Bullock R, Dzyundzyak A, Dupont D, Gerger Swartling Å, Johannessen Å, Huitema D, Lyth A, de Lourdes Melo Zurita M, et al. 2018. Flood governance: a multiple country comparison of stakeholder perceptions and aspirations. Environmental Policy and Governance. 28(2):67–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1796.
  • Quigley MC, Bennetts LG, Durance P, Kuhnert PM, Lindsay MD, Pembleton KG, Roberts ME, White CJ. 2019. The provision and utility of science and uncertainty to decision-makers: earth science case studies. Environment Systems and Decisions. 39(3):307–348.
  • Reisinger A, Wratt D, Allan S, Larsen H. 2011. Chapter 22, the role of local government in adapting to climate change: lessons from New Zealand. In: Ford J, Berrang-Ford L, editors. Climate change adaptation in developed nations: from theory to practice. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business; p. 303–318.
  • Resource Management Act. 1991. New Zealand.
  • Reu Junqueira J, Serrao-Neumann S, White I. 2021. A systematic review of approaches for modelling current and future impacts of extreme rainfall events using green infrastructure. Journal of Cleaner Production. 290:125173.
  • Ribot JC. 1995. The causal structure of vulnerability: its application to climate impact analysis. GeoJournal. 35(2):119–122.
  • RNZ. 2022. Nelson floods: hundreds of offers of help made. [accessed 2022 Oct 10]. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/473651/nelson-floods-hundreds-of-offers-of-help-made.
  • Roberts K, Dowell A, Nie J-B. 2019. Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19(1):66.
  • Rouse H. 2012. Flood risk management research in New Zealand: where we are, and where are we going? GNS Science Report 2012/04.
  • Royal Society of New Zealand. 2016. Climate change implications for New Zealand. Wellington: Royal Society of New Zealand.
  • Rözer V, Mehryar S, Surminski S. 2022. From managing risk to increasing resilience: a review on the development of urban flood resilience, its assessment and the implications for decision making. Environmental Research Letters. 17(12):123006.
  • Serrao-Neumann S, Di Giulio G, Low Choy D. 2020. When salient science is not enough to advance climate change adaptation: lessons from Brazil and Australia. Environmental Science & Policy. 109:73–82.
  • Smith W, Davies-Colley C, Mackay A, Bankoff G. 2011. Social impact of the 2004 Manawatu floods and the ‘hollowing out’ of rural New Zealand. Disasters. 35(3):540–553.
  • Srinivasan R, Carey-Smith T, Macara G. 2021. Trend analysis on frequency of New Zealand climate extremes. Weather and Climate. 41:18–29.
  • Steinschneider S, Wi S, Brown C. 2015. The integrated effects of climate and hydrologic uncertainty on future flood risk assessments. Hydrological Processes. 29(12):2823–2839.
  • Stone DA, Rosier SM, Bird L, Harrington LJ, Rana S, Stuart S, Dean SM. 2022. The effect of experiment conditioning on estimates of human influence on extreme weather. Weather and Climate Extremes. 36:100427.
  • Tonkin + Taylor Limited. 2018. Hiding in plain sight: an overview of current practices, national benefits and future challenges of our flood protection, river control and land drainage schemes.
  • United Nations. 2007. United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples.
  • van Buuren A, Lawrence J, Potter K, Warner JF. 2018. Introducing adaptive flood risk management in England, New Zealand, and the Netherlands: the impact of administrative traditions. Review of Policy Research. 35(6):907–929.
  • White I, Lawrence J. 2020. Continuity and change in national riskscapes: a New Zealand perspective on the challenges for climate governance theory and practice. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 13:215–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa005.
  • Wiering M, Liefferink D, Crabbé A. 2018. Stability and change in flood risk governance: on path dependencies and change agents. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 11(3):230–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12295.
  • Wing OEJ, Lehman W, Bates PD, Sampson CC, Quinn N, Smith AM, Neal JC, Porter JR, Kousky C. 2022. Inequitable patterns of US flood risk in the Anthropocene. Nature Climate Change. 12(2):156–162.
  • Winter AK, Karvonen A. 2022. Climate governance at the fringes: peri-urban flooding drivers and responses. Land Use Policy. 117:106124.
  • Wisner B, Gaillard J. 2009. An introduction to neglected disasters. JÀMBÁ: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. 2(3):8.