Defining our legacy to all future generations

References

• Cases cited
   Google Scholar
• All Aboard Aotearoa Inc v Auckland Transport [2022] NZHC 1620.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis v R [2022] NZSC 114.
   Google Scholar
• Hauraki Coromandel Climate Action Inc v Thames-Coromandel District Council [2020] NZHC 3228.
   Google Scholar
• Juliana v United States 217 F. Supp. 3d 1224.
   Google Scholar
• Lawyers for Climate Action New Zealand Inc v Climate Change Commission CIV-2021-485-341.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts v EPA 549 US 497 (2007), 127 S CT 1438 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Minors Oposa v Factoran (1993) 224 SCRA 792.
   Google Scholar
• Urgenda Foundation v Netherlands Hague DC C/09/456689/HA 2A 13-1396.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson v Minister of Climate Change Issues [2017] NZHC 733.
   Google Scholar
• R (on application of Client Earth) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 28.
   Google Scholar
• Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd [2020] NZHC 419, [2021] NZCA 522, [2022] NZSC 35
   Google Scholar
• Students for Climate Solutions Inc v Minister of Energy and Resources [2022] NZHC 2116.
   Google Scholar
• Other references
   Google Scholar
• Ardern J. 2017. Campaign Launch, 19 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ardern J. 2020. “New Zealand’s ‘go hard and go early’ COVID-19 response” (Newshub, 14 March 2020). newshub.co.nz.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh M. 2019. Tika transition toolbox. In: Hall D, editor. A careful revolution: towards a low-emissions future. Bridget Williams Books; p. 189.
   Google Scholar
• Bell J, Fisher E. 2022. Case note: the Heathrow case in the supreme court: climate change legislation and administrative adjudication. Modern Law Review. 1:12.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Paper. 2020. Action for healthy waterways – Decisions on national direction and regulations for freshwater management (18 May 2020) at [25].
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesson J. 2007. Public participation. In: Bodansky D, Brunnee J, Hey E, editors. The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 684.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher E, Scotford E, Barritt E. 2017. The legally disruptive nature of climate change. Modern Law Review. 80:173–201. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster C. 2021. Climate change litigation in New Zealand. In: Sindico F, Mbengue MM, editors. Comparative climate change litigation: beyond the usual suspects. Springer; p. 227–234. 234–235.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard MB, Wilensky M. 2016. The role of the national courts in GHG emissions reductions. In: Farber DA, Peeters M, editors. Climate change law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 359–371.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham N. 2020. Can climate activism deliver transformative change? Extinction rebellion, business and people power. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 11. 10:24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow C, Rawlings R. 2009. Law and administration. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Harris M. 2017. The New Zealand project. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books. 36, 43, 81, 98, 200, 203.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward B. 2017. Sea change: climate politics and New Zealand. Bridget Williams Books. 36, 51.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes A. 2022. Rebalancing wrongs: towards a New Law of remedies for Aotearoa New Zealand. VUWLR. 53:303. doi:10.26686/vuwlr.v53i2.7763.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph PA. 2014. Constitutional and administrative law in New Zealand. 5th ed. Wellington: Thomson Reuters. 319, 1378.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard M. 2019. Generation change. Geographical, April 2019 Volume 91 Issue 04, 20-21.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for the Environment. 2022. Greenhouse gas inventory snapshot 1990-2020: April 2022, 7, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Transport. 2018. Annual fleet statistics 2018, 7.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Human Rights Commission. 2016. New Zealand’s 6th periodic review under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Niehaus M, Davies K. 2021. Voices for the voiceless: climate protection from the streets to the courts. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 12. 228:231–236.
   Google Scholar
• Pachauri RK, Meyer LA. 2014. (eds) IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer G. 2015. What the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act aimed to do, why it did not succeed and how it can be repaired. Paper presented to Rights, Liberty and Equality: Runnymede to the Beehive: A conference marking 25 years of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and 800 years of Magna Carta, Auckland, September 2015. 2, 11, 12-13.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer G, Butler A. 2016. A constitution for Aotearoa New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press. 169, 171.
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin E. 2021. Tackling agricultural methane: an overview of the science. LegalPlanet, 3 September 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pirini M, Morar R. 2021. Climate change and the claiming of Te Tino Rangatiratanga. (2021) 5 NZWLJ 86.
   Google Scholar
• Preston BJ. 2021. Climate conscious lawyering. (2021) 94 ALJ 51.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani L. 2021. Determining national ‘fair shares’ in GHG mitigation within the principled framework of International Environmental Law, C-EENRG Seminar, University of Cambridge, 10 June 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp M, Smith N, Te Whenua T. 2020. Climate change claim on behalf of New Zealand’s indigenous Māori peoples. In: Henry C, Rockstrom J, Stern N, editors. Standing up for a sustainable world. Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 179.
   Google Scholar
• Shue S. 2014. Changing images of climate change: human rights and future generations. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment. 5:50–64. doi:10.4337/jhre.2014.02.06.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics NZ. 2020. New Zealand’s greenhouse gas emissions. (15 October 2020). stats.govt.nz.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DV. 2021. Justiciability and Tikanga: towards “soft” legal constitutionalism. NZULR. 29:649.
   Google Scholar