Climate change profiles of New Zealanders over time: a one-year latent transition analysis of climate change beliefs and concern

References

• Abrahamse W, Milfont TL, MacDonald EA. in press. Predictors of New Zealanders’ belief in anthropogenic climate change. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. Pre-print. doi:10.31234/osf.io/d6rtw.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer B. 1996. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B. 2014. Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 21:329–341. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athy AE, Milojev P, Gray NH, Osborne D, Sibley CG, Milfont TL. 2022. Clarifying longitudinal relations between individuals’ support for human rights and climate change beliefs. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 84:101875. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz SM. 2017. The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 53:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detenber BH, Rosenthal S. 2020. Climate change audience segmentation: an international review. In: Holmes DC, Richardson LM, editors. Research handbook on communicating climate change. Elgar; p. 214–229. doi:10.4337/9781789900408.00033.
   Google Scholar
• Hine DW, Reser JP, Morrison M, Phillips WJ, Nunn P, Cooksey R. 2014. Audience segmentation and climate change communication: conceptual and methodological considerations. WIRES Climate Change. 5:441–459. doi:10.1002/wcc.279.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS. 2016. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change. 6:622–626. doi:10.1038/nclimate2943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Fielding KS. 2018. Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change. 8:614–620. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Lewandowsky S. 2022. A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism. Nature Human Behaviour. 6:1454–1464. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard MC, Hoffman ME. 2017. Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods. 21:846–876. doi:10.1177/1094428117744021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä KM, Cantal C, Akrami N, Milfont TL. 2016. Denial of anthropogenic climate change: social dominance orientation helps explain the conservative male effect in Brazil and Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences. 98:184–187. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb WF, Mattioli G, Levi S, Roberts JT, Capstick S, Creutzig F, Minx JC, Müller-Hansen F, Culhane T, Steinberger JK. 2020. Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability. 3:E17. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.13.
   Google Scholar
• Lubke G, Muthén BO. 2007. Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling. 14:26–47. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1401_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright AM, Dunlap RE. 2011. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change. 21:1163–1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL. 2012a. The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy and concern about global warming and climate change: a one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis. 32:1003–1020. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01800.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL. 2012b. The psychology of environmental attitudes: conceptual and empirical insights from New Zealand. Ecopsychology. 42:269–276. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0058.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Abrahamse W, MacDonald EA. 2021a. Scepticism of anthropogenic climate change: additional evidence for the role of system-justifying ideologies. Personality and Individual Differences. 168:110237. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Milojev P, Greaves L, Sibley CG. 2015. Socio-structural and psychological foundations of climate change beliefs. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 44:17–30. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24245-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Osborne D, Yogeeswaran K, Sibley CG. 2020. The role of national identity in collective pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 72:101522. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Richter I, Sibley CG, Wilson MS, Fischer R. 2013. Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 39:1127–1138. doi:10.1177/0146167213490805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Sibley CG. 2014. The hierarchy enforcement hypothesis of environmental exploitation: a social dominance perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 55:188–193. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Sibley CG. 2016. Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: a one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 90:85–88. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Zubielevitch E, Milojev P, Sibley CG. 2021b. Ten-year panel data confirm generation gap but climate beliefs increase at similar rates across ages. Nature Communications. 12:4038. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24245-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén BO, Asparouhov T. 2022. Latent transition analysis with random intercepts (RI-LTA). Psychological Methods. 27(1):1–16. doi:10.1037/met0000370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO. 1998-2017. Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne D, Sibley CG. 2017. Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology. 28:288–332. doi:10.1080/10463283.2017.1379265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Steg L, Böhm G, Fisher S. 2019. Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: a cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change. 55:25–35. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto F., Sidanius J, Levin S. 2006. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology. 17:271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. 1994. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67:741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley CG. 2023. Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand attitudes and values study. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wgqvy.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley CG, Kurz T. 2013. A model of climate change belief profiles: how much does it matter if people question human causation? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 13:245–261. doi:10.1111/asap.12008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley CG, Luyten N, Purnomo M, Mobberley A, Wootton LW, Hammond MD, Sengupta N, Perry R, West-Newman T, Wilson MS, et al. 2011. The mini-IPIP6: validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 40:142–159. https://www.psychology.org.nz/journal-archive/SibleyIPIP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius J, Pratto F. 1999. Social dominance: an intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139175043.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanski LA, Carroll RJ. 1987. Conditional scores and optimal scores for generalized linear measurement-error models. Biometrika. 74(4):703–716. doi:10.2307/2336464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaker J. 2021. Climate change in the Kiwi mind: audience segmentation analysis. Wellington (NZ): Massey University.
   Google Scholar
• Wiernik BM, Ones DS, Dilchert S. 2013. Age and environmental sustainability: a meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 28:826–856. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams GA, Kibowski F. 2016. Latent class analysis and latent profile analysis. In: Jason LA, Glenwick DS, editors. Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Oxford University Press; p. 143–151. doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780190243654.003.0015.
   Google Scholar
• Wong-Parodi G, Feygina I. 2020. Understanding and countering the motivated roots of climate change denial. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 42:60–64. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. 2000. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues. 56:443–457. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar