Integrating philosophical and psychological approaches to well-being: The role of success in personal projects

References

• Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2016). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 766–781.10.1037/pspp0000066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn, N.M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Bramble, B. (2016). A new defense of hedonism about well-being. Ergo, 3(4), 85–112.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1992). Stability and change in subjective well-being over short time periods. Social Indicators Research, 26(2), 101–117.10.1007/BF00304394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. (2006). Hedonism reconsidered. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3), 619–645.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crumbaugh, J., & Maholick, L. (1964). An experimental study of existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 200–207.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C.G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E.D., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247–266.10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4
   Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt, J.J., Saris, W.E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177–205.10.1023/A:1010084410679
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, R.A., & Diener, E. (1986). A goal–affect analysis of everyday situational choices. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(3), 309–326.10.1016/0092-6566(86)90137-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature, varieties and plausibility of hedonism. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019926516X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heathwood, C. (2006). Desire satisfactionism and hedonism. Philosophical Studies, 128, 539–563.10.1007/s11098-004-7817-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heathwood, C. (2016). Desire-fulfillment Theory. In G. Fletcher (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being, 135–147. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inwood, B., & Gerson, L.P. (1994). The Epicurus reader: Selected writings and testimonia. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, C.L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C.D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R. (2009). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, B.R. (2006). Personality science and self-regulation: Personal projects as integrative units. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 419–427.10.1111/apps.2006.55.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, B.R. (2015). The integrative challenge in personality science: Personal projects as units of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 93–101.10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, B.R., Salmela-Aro, K.E., & Phillips, S.D. (2007). Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J.S. (1861/1979). Utilitarianism (G. Sher, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. Malden, MA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M.C. (2001). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press 322, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Raibley, J. (2010). Well-being and the priority of values. Social Theory and Practice, 36, 593–620.10.5840/soctheorpract201036432
   Google Scholar
• Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K.M., & Elliot, A.J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482.10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J.J.C., & Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840852
   Google Scholar
• Steger, M.F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, L. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Tiberius, V. (2008). The reflective life: Living wisely with our limits. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199202867.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard, C. (2013). Classifying theories of welfare. Philosophical Studies, 165(3), 787–803.10.1007/s11098-012-9978-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar