512
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Realistic virtues and how to study them: Introducing the STRIVE-4 model

&

References

  • Adams, R. M. (2006). A theory of virtue: Excellence in being for the good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Adams, R. M. (2010). A theory of virtue: Response to critics. Philosophical Studies, 148(1), 159–165.
  • Bleidorn, W., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2015). Virtues in action—The new look of character traits. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 700–723.
  • Bradley, B. (2007). Review of Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good, by Robert Merrithew Adams. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. South Bend: Notre Dame University. Retrieved from: https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/a-theory-of-virtue-excellence-in-being-for-the-good/
  • Cokelet, B. (2014). Review of Moral character: An empirical theory, by Christian Miller. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. South Bend: Notre Dame University. Retrieved from http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/moral-character-an-empirical-theory/
  • Cokelet, B. (2018). The virtues of compassion. In J. Caouette & C. Price (Eds.), The moral psychology of compassion, (pp. 15–31). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Doris, J. (1998). Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs, 32(4), 504–530.
  • Doris, J. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Doris, J. (2015). Heated agreement: Lack of character as being for the good. Philosophical Studies, 148, 135–146.
  • Doris, J. (2015). Review of Character and moral psychology, by Christian B. Miller. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. South Bend: Notre Dame University. Retrieved from http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/character-and-moral-psychology/
  • Driver, J. (2001). Uneasy virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb, R. M. Lerner, M. E. Lamb, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (Vol. 3, 7th ed., pp. 610–656). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Epstein, S., & O’Brien, E. J. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513–537.
  • Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027.
  • Fowers, B. J., Carroll, J. S., Leonhardt, N., & Cokelet, B. (2017). The emerging science of virtue. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Fowers, B. J., Lane, A. A., Cioffi, K., Lang, S. F., Cokelet, B., & Anderson, A. R. (2017). Trait justice and resource sharing behavior: An experimental study of justice as interpersonal fairness. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Fowers, B. J., Lang, S. F., Cokelet, B., Lane, A. A., Anderson, A. R., & Cioffi, K. (2017). Virtues as properly motivated, self-integrated traits. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99, 315–331.
  • Harman, G. (2009). Skepticism about character traits. The Journal of Ethics, 13, 235–242.
  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 1: Studies in deceit. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Hurka, T. (2003). Virtue, vice, and value. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Kant, I., Wood, A., & Di Giovanni, G. (1998). Kant: Religion within the boundaries of mere reason: And other writings. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Keltner, D., Kogan, A., Piff, P. K., & Saturn, S. R. (2014). The sociocultural appraisals, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality: Core processes from gene to meme. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 425–460.
  • Lefevor, G. T., & Fowers, B. J. (2016). Traits, situational factors, and their interactions as explanations of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 159–163.
  • Lefevor, G. T., Fowers, B. J., Ahn, S., Lang, S. F., & Cohen, L. M. (2017). To what degree do situational influences explain spontaneous helping behaviour? A meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 28, 227–256.
  • Meindl, P., Jayawickreme, E., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2013). A foundation beam for studying morality from a personological point of view: Are individual differences in moral behaviors and thoughts consistent? Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 81–92.
  • Merritt, M. (2000). Virtue ethics and situationist personality psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(4), 365–383.
  • Miller, C. (2013). Moral character: An empirical theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, C. (2014). Character and moral psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, C. (2016). Empirical approaches to moral character. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition). Stanford: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/moral-character-empirical/
  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.
  • Rushton, J.-P. (1984). The altruistic personality. In E. Straub, D. BarTal, J. Karylowski, & J. Reykowski (Eds.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior (pp. 271–290). New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Russell, D. (2009). Practical intelligence and the virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211–238.
  • Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Sherman, J. W. (2009). The practice of psychological science: Searching for Cronbach’s two streams in social-personality psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1206–1225.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.