Turning investments green in bond markets: Qualification, devices and morality

References

• Ameli, N., Drummond, P., Bisaro, A., Grubb, M. & Chenet, H. (2020). Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: Why transparency is not enough. Climatic Change, 160(4), 565–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. & Cointe, B. (2021). Experiments in co-modification: A relational take on the becoming of commodities and the making of market value. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14(3), 280–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AXA Investment Managers. (2019, June 10). Financing brown to green: Guidelines for transition bonds. Retrieved from https://www.axa-im.co.uk/research-and-insights/insights/responsible-investing/environmental/financing-brown-green-guidelines-transition-bonds
   Google Scholar
• Bear, L. (2015). Navigating austerity: Currents of debt along a South Asian River. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, L. (2020). Speculation: A political economy of technologies of imagination. Economy and Society, 49(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. & Musselin, C. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing quality: The classification of goods in markets. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berrou, R., Ciampoli, N. & Marini, V. (2019). Defining green finance: Existing standards and main challenges. In M. Migliorelli & P. Dessertine (Eds.), The rise of green finance in Europe (pp. 31–51). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• BNP Paribas. (2019). Focus Global Transition Bonds: New funding for a greener world. Retrieved from https://cib.bnpparibas/app/uploads/sites/2/2021/03/markets-360-brief-on-transition-bonds.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bracking, S., Fredriksen, A., Sullivan, S. & Woodhouse, P. (Eds.). (2018). Valuing development, environment and conservation: Creating values that matter. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bracking, S. & Leffel, B. (2021). Climate finance governance: Fit for purpose? WIREs Climate Change, 12(4), e709.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. (2009). Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions, and representation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. L. (2013). Branding natural resources: Science, violence and marketing in the making of teak. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(4), 517–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalıskan, K. & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K. & Callon, M. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Méadel, C. & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 36(2), 194–217.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climate Bond Initiative (CBI). (2020). Financing credible transition: How to ensure the transition label has impact. Retrieved from https://www.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi_fincredtransitions_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CBI. (2023). 2022 Market Snapshot. Retrieved from https://www.climatebonds.net/2023/01/2022-market-snapshot-and-5-big-directions-sustainable-finance-2023
   Google Scholar
• Christophers, B. (2019). Environmental beta or how institutional investors think about climate change and fossil fuel risk. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(3), 754–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, S. (2022). Inscriptions of resilience: Bond ratings and the government of climate risk in Greater Miami, Florida. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(2), 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschryver, P. & De Mariz, F. (2020). What future for the green bond market? How can policymakers, companies, and investors unlock the potential of the green bond market? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Finance (EF). (2021). Sustainable bonds insight 2021. Retrieved from https://www.environmental-finance.com/assets/files/research/sustainable-bonds-insight-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EF. (2022a). Sustainable bonds insight 2022. Retrieved from https://www.environmental-finance.com/assets/files/research/sustainable-bond-insight-2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EF. (2022b, March 29). Transition bond structure could be revived by EU taxonomy extension. Retrieved from https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/news/transition-bond-structure-could-be-revived-by-eu-taxonomy-extension.html
   Google Scholar
• Esguerra, A. (2017). ‘A comment that might help us to move along’: Brokers in negotiation systems. In A. Esguerra, N. Helmerich & T. Risse (Eds.), Sustainability politics and limited statehood (pp. 25–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Frequently asked questions about the work of the European Commission and the Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance on EU Taxonomy & EU Green Bond Standard 2020. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/200610-sustainable-finance-teg-taxonomy-green-bond-standard-faq
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2005). The order of things. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., Davies, P. & Dominguez, I. (2019). Client alert commentary, capital markets practice, transition bonds: Guidelines may expand sustainable finance. Latham and Watkins. Retrieved from https://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/lw-transition-bonds-guidelines-may-expand-sustainable-finance
   Google Scholar
• Furness, V. (2021, June 8). Why transition bonds have failed to make their mark. Capital Monitor. Retrieved from https://capitalmonitor.ai/sector/energy-and-utilities/why-transition-bonds-have-failed-to-make-their-mark-so-far/
   Google Scholar
• García-Lamarca, M. & Ullström, S. (2022). ‘Everyone wants this market to grow’: The affective post-politics of municipal green bonds. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(1), 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, I. (2020). Investment, value, and the making of entrepreneurship in India. Economic Anthropology, 7(2), 190–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. & Jaffe, A. M. (2022). Challenges for a climate risk disclosure mandate. Nature Energy, 7(1), 2–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, I. & Doumbia, D. (2022). Structural loopholes in sustainability-linked bonds. SSRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4114616
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsche, I. C. (2021, August 21). A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers (Center for Financial Studies Working Paper No. 663, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury and UK Debt Management Office. (2021). Green Gilts investor presentation. October update. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1033194/Green_Gilt_Investor_Presentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2010). Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 558–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Capital Market Association (ICMA). (2020). Climate transition finance handbook guidance for issuers. ICMA. Retrieved from https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-Bonds/Climate-Transition-Finance-Handbook-December-2020-091220.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ICMA. (2021, June). Green Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds. Retrieved from https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Green-Bond-Principles-June-2021-140621.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Konefal, J. & Hatanaka, M. (2011). Enacting third-party certification: A case study of science and politics in organic shrimp certification. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(2), 125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölbel, J. & Lambillon, A. (2022). Who pays for sustainability? An analysis of sustainability-linked bonds. SSRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4007629
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., Bridge, G., Bulkeley, H. & van Veelen, B. (2021). Decarbonizing capital: Investment, divestment and the qualification of carbon assets. Economy and Society, 50(3), 494–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leins, S. (2020). ‘Responsible investment’: ESG and the post-crisis ethical order. Economy and Society, 49(1), 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leins, S. (2022). Narrative authority: Rethinking speculation and then construction of economic expertise. Ethnos, 87(2), 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London Stock Exchange. (2022, February 16). Supporting companies on the road to net zero. Retrieved from https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/the-green-bond-hub/supporting-companies-on-the-road-to-net-zero.html
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, P. A. & Shilling, C. (2017). Arbitrage, uncertainty and the new ethos of capitalism. The Sociological Review, 65(1), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74–89). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Wille, S. & Charmantier, I. (2012). Natural history and information overload: The case of Linnaeus. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 4–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muniesa, F., Millo, Y. & Callon, M. (2007). An introduction to market devices. The Sociological Review, 55(2_suppl), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Nedopil, C., Dordi, T. & Weber, O. (2021). The nature of global green finance standards: Evolution, differences, and three models. Sustainability, 13(7), 3723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. (2022). Transition finance struggles to gain ground: These bonds and loans are not popular despite growing demand for sustainable products. South China Morning Post.
   Google Scholar
• Niner, H. J. & Randalls, S. (2021). Good enough for governance? Audit and marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia. Geoforum, 120, 38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. (2021). Governing for growth: Standards, emergent markets, and the lenient zone of qualification for green bonds. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(7), 2044–2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platform on Sustainable Finance (PoSF). (2022, March 22). The extended environmental taxonomy: Final report on taxonomy extension options supporting a sustainable transition. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/220329-sustainable-finance-platform-finance-report-environmental-transition-taxonomy_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Research Institute for Environmental Finance (REIF). (2020). Transition finance guidance.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (1998). Placing the view from nowhere: Historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23(1), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Haga, A., Langeborg, A. L., Holmgren, M., Wallinder, M., Nöstl, A., … Marsh, J. E. (2015). The green halo: Mechanisms and limits of the eco-label effect. Food Quality and Preference, 43, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, B. (2012). Bringing discourse to the market: The commodification of avoided deforestation. Environmental Politics, 21(4), 621–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2018). Making nature investable: From legibility to leverageability in fabricating ‘nature’ as ‘natural capital’. Science and Technology Studies, 31(3), 47–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon, A. (2021). Transition finance: Investigating the state of play: A stocktake of emerging approaches and financial instruments (OECD, Environment Working Paper No.179).
   Google Scholar
• Torsten, E. & Packer, F. (2017, September 17). Green bond finance and certification. BIS Quarterly Review. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3042378
   Google Scholar
• Tripathy, A. (2017). Translating to risk: The legibility of climate change and nature in the green bond market. Economic Anthropology, 4(2), 239–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troeger, T. H. & Steuer, S. (2021). The role of disclosure in green finance (European Corporate Governance Institute-Law Working Paper, 604).
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A. & Hulme, M. (2016). What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, R. (2021). The fantasy of carbon offsetting. Environmental Politics, 30(7), 1069–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, D. (2022, March 29). The death of transition bonds. Responsible Investor.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. (2021). Why investors are unconvinced by transition bonds. Energy Monitor. Retrieved from https://www.energymonitor.ai/finance/sustainable-finance/why-investors-are-unconvinced-by-transition-bonds
   Google Scholar