A comparison of trans‐tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions

References

• Bader DL, Barnhill RL, Ryan TJ. Effect of externally applied skin surface forces on tissue vasculature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 807–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett L, Kavner D, Lee BK, Trainor FA. Shear vs. pressure as a causative factors in skin blood flow occlusion. Arch Phys Med and Rehabil 1979; 60: 309–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakey J. Gait of unilateral below‐knee amputees. Orthot Prosthet 1976; 30: 17–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson JM, Payette MJ, Vervena LP. Seating orthosis design for prevention of decubitus ulcers. J Prosthet Orthot 1995; 7: 51–60
   Google Scholar
• Cheung C, Wall JC, Zelin S. A microcomputer‐based system for measuring temporal asymmetry in amputee gait. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 131–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chino N, Pearson JR, Cockrell IL, et al. Negative pressure during swing phase in below‐knee prostheses with rubber sleeve suspension. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1975; 56: 22–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Commean PK, Smith KE, Cheverud JM, Vannier MW. Precision of surface measurements for below‐knee residua. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 477–486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Commean PK, Smith KE, Vannier MW. Lower extremity residual limb slippage within the prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 476–485
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dingwell JB, Davis BL, Frazier DM. Use of an instrumented treadmill for real‐time gait symmetry evaluation and feedback in normal and trans‐tibial amputee subjects. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 101–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernie GR, Holliday PJ. Volume fluctuations in the residual limbs of lower limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 162–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbranson FL, Wirta RW, Kuncir EJ, Lieber RL, Oishi C. Volume changes occurring in postoperative below‐knee residual limbs,. J Rehabil Res Dev 1988; 25: 11–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grahn D, Brock‐Utne JG, Watenpaugh DE. Recovery from mild hypothermia can be accelerated by mechanically distending blood vessels in the hand. J Appl Physiol 1998; 85: 1643–1648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grevsten S. Ideas on the suspension of the below‐knee prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1978; 2: 3–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grevsten S, Eriksson U. Residuum‐socket contact and skeletal displacement in a suction patellar‐tendon bearing prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56: 1692–1696
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hachisuka K, Dozono K, Ogata H, et al. Total surface bearing below‐knee prosthesis: advantages, disadvantages, and clinical implications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 783–789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog W, Nigg BM, Read LJ, et al. Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 110–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnman EK, Weinshenker E. Method and apparatus for augmenting blood circulation. USA Gov Doc. April 19, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Naylor PFD. The skin surface and friction. Brit J Dermatol 1955; 67: 239–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson JR, Grevsten S, Almby B, Marsh L. Pressured variations in the below‐knee, patellar tendon bearing suction socket prosthesis. J Biomech 1974; 7: 487–496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson BM, Liedberg E. A clinical standard of stump measurement and classification in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 17–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin MR. Effects of design variants in lower‐limb prostheses on gait synergy. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 9: 113–122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts RA. Suction socket suspension for below‐knee amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 196–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabolich JA. Sense of feel for lower‐limb amputees: A phase‐one study. J Prosthet Orthot 1994; 6: 36–41
   Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Daly CH, Burgess EM. Interface shear stresses during ambulation with a below‐knee prosthetic limb. J Rehabil Res Dev 1992; 29: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seliktar R, Mizrahi J. Some gait characteristics of below‐knee amputees and their reflection on ground reaction forces. Eng Med 1986; 15: 27–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silver‐Thorn MB, Steege JW, Childress DS. A review of prosthetic interface stress investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev 1996; 33: 253–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner HB, Effeney DJ. Gait analysis in amputees. Am J Phys Med 1985; 64: 82–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonck WA, Cockrell JL, Koepke GH. Effect of liner materials on interface pressures in below‐knee prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 666–669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staats TB, Lundt J. The UCLA total surface bearing suction below‐knee prosthesis. Clin Prosthet Orthot 1987; 11: 118–130
   Google Scholar
• Vaitl D, Mittelstaedt J, Baisch F. Shifts in blood volume alter the perception of posture. Int J Psychophyiol 1997; 27: 99–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winter DA, Sienko SE. Biomechanics of below‐knee amputee gait. J Biomech 1988; 21: 361–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Wolthuis RA, LeBlanc A, Carpentier WA. Response of local vascular volumes to lower body negative pressure stress. Aviat Space Environ Med 1975; 46: 697–702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahedi MS, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Repeatability of kinetic and kinematic measurements in gait studies of the lower limb amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Turner‐Smith AR, Tanner A, Roberts VC. Clinical investigation of the pressure and shear stress on the trans‐tibial residuum with prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 188–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Turner‐Smith AR, Roberts VC, Tanner A. Frictional action at lower limb/prosthetic interface. Med Eng Phys 1996; 18: 207–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar