Optimising the trans‐femoral prosthetic alignment for running, by lowering the knee joint

References

• Bennell K, Crossley K, Wrigley T, Nitschke A. Test‐retest reliability of selected ground reaction force parameters and their symmetry during running. J Appl Biomech 1999; 153: 330–336
   Google Scholar
• Blumentritt S, Scherer HW, Wellershaus U, Michael JW. Design principles, biomechanical data and clinical experience with polycentric knee offering controlled stance phase knee flexion: a preliminary report. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 91: 18–24
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra AM, Fidler V, Eisma WH. Walking speed of normal subjects and amputees: aspects of validity of gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 172: 78–82
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra AM, Schrama JM, Eisma WH, Hof AL, Fidler EV. Gait analysis of trans‐femoral amputee patients using prostheses with two different knee joints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 775: 515–520
   Google Scholar
• Buckley JG. Biomechanical adaptations of trans‐tibial amputee sprinting in athletes using dedicated prostheses. Clin Biomech 2000; 155: 352–358
   Google Scholar
• Czerniecki JM. Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 1. gait and motion analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 53–58
   Google Scholar
• Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V. Time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces during walking — an investigation of variability and symmetry. Gait Posture 1997; 53: 189–197
   Google Scholar
• Gitter A, Czerniecki J, Meinders M. Effect of prosthetic mass on swing phase work during above‐knee amputee ambulation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 762: 114–121
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk FA, Stills M. The biomechanics of trans‐femoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 181: 12–17
   Google Scholar
• Hale S. Analysis of the swing phase dynamics and muscular effort of the above‐knee amputee for varying prosthetic shank loads. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 125–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakov E, Burger H, Krainik K, Gregoric M, Marincek C. Influence of speed on gait parameters and symmetry in trans‐tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 153–158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaegers S, Arendzen JH, Dejongh HJ. Prosthetic gait of unilateral trans‐femoral amputees ‐ a kinematic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 768: 736–743
   Google Scholar
• Jaegers S, Arendzen JH, Dejongh HJ. An electromyographic study of the hip muscles of trans‐femoral amputees in walking. Clin Orthol 1996; 328: 119–128
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane PA, Nielson DH, Shurr DG. Mechancial gait analysis of trans‐femoral amputees: SACH foot versus Flex Foot. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 94: 144–151
   Google Scholar
• Mattes S, Martin P, Royer T. Walking symmetry and energy cost in persons with unilateral trans‐tibial amputations: matching prosthetic and intact limb inertial properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 815: 561–568
   Google Scholar
• Mensch G, Ellis P. Running patterns of trans‐femoral amputees: a clinical analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986; 10: 129–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzur M, Gold J, Schwartz D, Gross N. Energy demands for walking in dysvascular amputees as related to the level of amputation. Orthopedics 1992; 15: 1033–1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi H, Allard P, Duhaime M. Functional gait asymmetry in able‐bodied subjects. Hum Mov Sci 1997; 16: 243–258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Daly CH. Normal and shear stresses on a residual limb in a prosthetic socket during ambulation: comparison of finite element results with experimental measurements. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993; 30: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selles RW, Bussmann JBJ, Wagenaar RC, Stam HJ. Effects of prosthetic mass and mass distribution on kinematics and energetics of prosthetic gait: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 801: 1593–1599
   Google Scholar
• Taylor MB, Clark E, Offord EA, Baxter C. A comparison of energy expenditure by a high level trans‐femoral amputee using the intelligent prosthesis and conventionally damped prosthetic limbs. Prosthet Ortot Int 1996; 20: 116–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Linden ML, Solomonidis SE, Spence WD, Li N, Paul JP. A methodlogy for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechancics of trans‐femoral amputee gait. J Biomech 1999; 32: 877–889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahedi M, Spence W, Solomonidis S, Paul J. Repeatability of kinetic and kinematic measurements in gait studies of the lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar