Characterisation of prosthetic feet used in low‐income countries

References

• Arya AP, Lees A, Nirula HC, Klenerman L. A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 19: 37–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings D. Prosthetics in the developing world: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 51–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day HJB. A review of the consensus conference on appropriate prosthetic technology in developing countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gard S, Childress D. What determines the vertical displacement of the body during normal walking?. J Prosthet Orthot 2001; 13: 64–67
   Google Scholar
• Girling J, Commings G. Artificial‐limb fabrication without the use of commercially made components. Prosthet Int 1972; 4((2))21–25
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Childress DS, Knox EH. Prosthetic foot roll‐over shapes with implications for alignment of trans‐tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000; 24: 205–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen AH. Roll‐over Characteristics of human walking with applications for artificial limbs. Northwestern University, ‐Evanston, IL 2002, Ph.D. Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Childress DS, Knox EH. Rollover shapes of human locomotor systems: Effects of walking speed. Clin Biomech 2004a; 19: 407–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Sam M, Childress DS. The effective foot length ratio (EFLR) a potential tool for characterisation and evaluation of prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot 2004b; 16: 41–45
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Heim S. Preliminary experiences with modified SACH feet manufactured and used in a tropical developing world setting. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999; 23: 245–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabra SG, Narayanan R. Equipment and methods for laboratory testing of ankle‐foot prostheses as exemplified by the Jaipur foot. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991; 28: 23–34
   Google Scholar
• Kijkusol D. Simplified low cost below‐knee prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986; 10: 96–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox EH. The Role of Prosthetic Feet in Walking. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 1996, Ph.D. Dissertation, ‐
   Google Scholar
• Matthews D, Burgess E, Boone D. The all‐terrain foot. J Prosthet Orthot 1993; 5: 29–30
   Google Scholar
• Meanley S, Reed NK. An “appropriate technology” trans‐femoral prosthesis, using materials available in Nepal. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998; 22: 123–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meanley S. Different approaches and cultural considerations in third world prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 19: 176–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan D, Sethi PK, Ravi R. Mathematical modeling and field trials of an inexpensive endoskeletal above‐knee prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992; 16: 118–123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller GM. A simple prosthesis for rural amputees. J Bone Joint Surg 1957; 39B: 131
   Google Scholar
• Oshin TA. Indigenous substitutes for modern prostheses and orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1981; 5: 144–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sam M, Hansen AH, Childress DS (2000) Mechanical characterisation of prosthetic feet using a prosthetic foot loading apparatus. Short Paper No. 5716–81481, World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Chicago, July, 23–282000
   Google Scholar
• Sethi PK. Technological choices in prosthetics and orthotics for developing countries. Prosthet Orthot Int 1989; 13: 117–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi PK, Udanat MP, Kaliswal SC, Chandra R. Vulcanised rubber for lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1978; 2: 125–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson WT. Vibration. Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers./, T. Baumeister, L.S. Marks. McGraw‐Hill Book Company, ‐ New York 1967; 90–91
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeff TT, Poetsma PA, Gasser L, Tung H. Evaluation of use and durability of polypropylene trans‐tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999; 23: 249–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossberg A. The development of orthopaedic appliances and low cost aids in “least developed countries”. Prosthet Orthot Int 1985; 9: 83–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edition. Wiley‐Interscience Publication, New York 1990; 33
   Google Scholar
• Wollstein LJ. Fabrication of a below‐knee prosthesis especially suitable in tropical countries. Prosthet Int 1972; 4((2))5–8
   Google Scholar