Contact force ratio: A new parameter to assess foot arch function

References

• Abboud RJ, Rowley DI. Foot pressure measurement. In: Surgery of disorders of the foot and ankle./, B Helal, DI Rowley, A Cracchiolo, III, MS Myersion. Martin Dunitiz Ltd., ‐ London 1996; 123–133
   Google Scholar
• Brody D. Techniques in evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthop Clin North Am 1982; 13: 541–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987; 20: 547–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu WC, Lee SH, Chu W, Wang T, Lee M. The use of Arch Index to characterise arch height: A digital image processing approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995; 42: 1088–1093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke HH. An objective method of measuring the height of the longitudinal arch in foot examinations. Res Q Exerc Sport 1933; 4: 99–107
   Google Scholar
• Cobey JC, Sella E. Standardising methods of measurement of foot shape by including the effects of subtalar rotation. Foot Ankle Int 1981; 2: 30–36
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Three‐dimensional movement of the foot during the stance phase of walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1999a; 89: 56–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relative movement of the navicular bone during normal walking. Foot Ankle Int 1999b; 20: 507–512
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Motion of calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal during the stance. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002; 92: 67–76
   Google Scholar
• Cureton TK. The validity of footprints as a measure of vertical height of the arch and functional efficiency of the foot. Res Q Exerc Sport 1935; 6: 70–80
   Google Scholar
• Didia BC, Omu ET, Obuoforibo AA. The use of footprint contact index II for classification of flat feet in a Nigerian population. Foot Ankle 1987; 7: 285–289
   Google Scholar
• Forriol F, Pascual J. Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle 1990; 11: 101–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, Kirkpartick GM. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity meassures. Clin Biomech 1989; 4: 217–225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison AJ, Folland JP. Investigation of gait protocols for plantar pressure measurement of non‐pathological subjects using a dynamic pedobarograph. Gait Posture 1997; 6: 50–55
   Google Scholar
• Hawes MR, Nachbauer W, Sovak D, Nigg BM. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle 1992; 13: 22–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes J, Pratt L, Linge K, Clarke P, Klenerman L. Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech 1991; 6: 14–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin LW. A study of the tendency of school children to develop flat‐footedness. Res Q Exerc Sport 1937; 8: 46–53
   Google Scholar
• Lipták B. Instrument Engineers’ Handbook./, B Lipták. Chilton Book Co, Pennsylvania 1982, –
   Google Scholar
• McCrory JL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Cavangh PR. Arch index as a predictor of arch height. The Foot 1997; 7: 79–81
   Google Scholar
• McPoil T, Cornwall MW. Relationship between neutral subtalar joint position and pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. Foot Ankle 1994; 15: 141–145
   Google Scholar
• McPoil T, Cornwall MW, Yamada W. A comparison of two in‐shoe plantar pressure measurement systems. Lower Extremity 1995; 2: 95–103
   Google Scholar
• Meyers‐Rice B, Sugars L, McPoil T, Cornwall MW. Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1994; 84: 499–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittlemeier TWF, Morlock M. Pressure distribution measurements in gait analysis: dependency on measurement frequency. Abstract presented at: 39th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Mueller MJ, Host JV, Norton BJ. Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1993; 83: 198–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picciano AM, Rowlands MS, Worrell T. Reliability of open and closed kinetic chain subtalar joint neutral positions and navicular drop test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993; 18: 553–558, 1993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polliack AA, Sieh RC, Craig DD, Landsberger S, McNeil DR, Ayyappa E. Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit. Prothet Orthot Int 2000; 24: 63–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaura SR, Deodhar SD, Jit L. Podographical and metrical study of pes planus in a North‐Western Indian Population. Hum Biol 1980; 52: 435–445
   Google Scholar
• Quesada PM, Rash GS. Quantitative assessment of simultaneous capacitive and resistive plantar pressure measurements during walking. Foot Ankle Int 2000; 21: 928–934
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum D, Hautmann S, Gold M, Claes L. Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion. Gait Posture 1994; 2: 191–197
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz L, Britten RH, Thompson LR. Studies in Physical Development and Posture (Report no. 179). ‐. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1928, U.S. Public Health Bulletin
   Google Scholar
• Sell KE, Verity TM, Worrell TW, Pease BJ, Wigglesworth J. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 19: 162–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiang TY, Lee SH, Lee SJ, Chu WC. Evaluating difference footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height. IEEE Eng Med Biol 1998; 98: 62–66
   Google Scholar
• Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69A: 426–428
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland DH. The development of mature gait. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62A: 335–353
   Google Scholar
• Wearing SC, Urry S, Smeathers JE, Battistutta D. A comparison of gait initiation and termination methods for obtaining plantar foot pressures. Gait Posture 1999; 10: 255–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodburn J, Helliwell PS. Observations on the F‐Scan in‐shoe pressure measuring system. Clin Biomech 1996; 11: 301–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar