Cognitive Aging and Training: The Role of Instructional Coherence and Advance Organizers

REFERENCES

• Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers and Education, 41, 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bopp, K. L., & Verhaeghen, P. (2005). Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60, 223–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, J. S., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. (2003). Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management, 29, 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, N., Shumann, C., & Boritz, G. M. (1992). Training older adults in word processing: Effects of age, training technique, and computer anxiety. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 5, 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities, mechanisms and performance (Part A; pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, P. K., Elias, M. F., Robbins, M. A., & Gage, P. (1987). Acquisition of word processing skills by younger, middle-age, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 2, 340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004). Age-related impairment in executive functioning: Updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 874–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R., Alexander, P. A, Gillingham, M. G., Kulikowich, J. M., & Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 643–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. T., & Sadoski, M. (1995). Commentary: The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions? Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 500–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M., & McGill, E. (2011). The 2011 ASTD state of the industry report. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Training and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. Attention and performance (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Aging and a benefit of distractibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 301–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2006). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of advanced organizers on learning and retention. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1979). Twenty years of research on advance organizers: Assimilation theory is still the best predictor of results. Instructional Science, 8, 133–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005a). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., Kliegl, R., & Krampe, R. T. (1996). Sequential and coordinative processing dynamics in figural transformations across the life span. Cognition, 59, 61–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., Cohen, J. A., & Wingfield, A. (2006). Knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1355–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1170–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2002). Planning for training impact: Principles of training effectiveness. In K. Kraiger (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 53–79). Mahwah, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Noh, S., Shake, M. C., Parisi, J. M., Joncich, A. D., Morrow, D. G., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2007). Age differences in learning from text: The effects of content pre-exposure on reading. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2001). Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 187–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D., & Payer, D. (2006). Working memory across the adult lifespan. In E. Bialystock & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 128–142). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preiss, R. W., & Gayle, B. M. (2006). A meta-analysis of the educational benefits of employing advance organizers. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 329–344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Situation models and aging. Psychology and Aging, 16, 145–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica, 79, 155–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1993). Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 29–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauzéon, H., Claverie, B., & N’Kaoua, B. (2006). Age differences in the organization and acquisition-forgetting processes in a multi-free-recall task. Current Psychology Letters, 1, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soederberg, M., L. (2009). Age differences in the effects of domain knowledge on reading efficiency. Psychology and Aging, 24, 63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (1983). A meta-analysis of advance organizer studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51, 194–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalheimer, W. (2004, April). Bells, whistles, neon, and purple prose: When interesting words, sounds, and visuals hurt learning and performance—A review of the seductive-augmentation research. Retrieved from http://www.work-learning.com/seductive_augmentations.htm
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. N. (1997). Practice effects of advance organization with older adult subjects. Educational Gerontology, 23, 207–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. N., Holzman, T., & Doll, L. (1985, April). Using advance organizers to improve reading comprehension with older adults. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Toossi, M. (2009). Labor force projections to 2018: Older workers staying more active. Monthly Labor Review, 132, 30–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towler, A. J. (2009). Effects of trainer expressiveness, seductive details, and trainee goal orientation on training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towler, A. J., Kraiger, K., Sitzmann, T., Van Overberghe, C., Kuo, J., Ronen, E., & Stewart, D. (2008). The seductive details effect in technology-delivered instruction. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21, 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., & Tabbers, H. K. (2006). Cognitive aging and computer-based instructional design: Where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar