294
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Phylogeographical patterns in the northwestern European moss Scorpidium revolvens (Sw. ex Anonymo) Rubers (Scorpidiaceae, Bryophyta)

ORCID Icon

References

  • Bączkiewicz A, Szczecińska M, Sawicki J, Stebel A, Buczkowska K. 2017. DNA barcoding, ecology and geography of the cryptic species of Aneura pinguis and their relationships with Aneura maxima and Aneura mirabilis (Metzgeriales, Marchantiophyta). PLOS One. 12(12):e0188837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188837.
  • Bennike O, Colgan W, Hedenäs L, Heiri O, Lemdahl G, Wiberg-Larsen P, Ribeiro S, Pronzato R, Manconi R, Bjørk AA. 2022. An Early Pleistocene interglacial deposit at Pingorsuit, North-West Greenland. Boreas. 52(1):27–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12596.
  • Borgen L, Hultgård UM. 2003. Parnassia palustris: a genetically diverse species in Scandinavia. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 142(4):347–372. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00186.x.
  • Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology. 9(10):1657–1659. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x.
  • Eriksson G, Andersson S, Eiche V, Ifver J, Persson A. 1980. Severity index and transfer effects on survival and volume production of Pinus sylvestris in northern Sweden. Studia Forestalia Suecica. 156:1–32. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/5442/1/SFS156.pdf.
  • Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources. 10(3):564–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x.
  • Feliner GN, Rosselló JA. 2007. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 44(2):911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.01.013.
  • Frankham R. 1996. Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology. 10(6):1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061500.x. https://jstor.org/stable/2387021.
  • Fu Y. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 147(2):915–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.2.915.
  • Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K. 2003. Tree analysis using new technology. [accessed 2017 May 3]. http://www.lillo.org.ar/phylogeny/tnt/.
  • Graham J, Farr G, Hedenäs L, Devez A, Watts MJ. 2019. Using water chemistry to define ecological preferences within the moss genus Scorpidium, from Wales, UK. Journal of Bryology. 41(3):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1603416.
  • Hedenäs L. 1989. The genera Scorpidium and Hamatocaulis, gen. nov., in Northern Europe. Lindbergia. 15(1):8–36.
  • Hedenäs L. 2003a. Amblystegiaceae (Musci). Flora Neotropica Monograph. 89:i–iv, 1–107.
  • Hedenäs L. 2003b. The European species of the Calliergon–Scorpidium–Drepanocladus complex, including some related or similar species. Meylania. 28:1–116. https://www.bryolich.ch/pdfs/Meylania_ganze_Hefte/Meylania%2028.pdf.
  • Hedenäs L. 2009. Relationships among Arctic and non-Arctic haplotypes of the moss species Scorpidium cossonii and Scorpidium scorpioides (Calliergonaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 277:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0131-y.
  • Hedenäs L. 2014. Intraspecific genetic variation in selected mosses of Scandinavian interglacial refugia suggests contrasting distribution history patterns. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 176(3):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12210.
  • Hedenäs L. 2015. Rhytidium rugosum (Bryophyta) colonized Scandinavia from at least two glacial refugial source populations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 179(4):635–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12341.
  • Hedenäs L. 2019. On the frequency of northern and mountain genetic variants of widespread species: essential biodiversity information in a warmer world. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 191(4):440–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boz061.
  • Hedenäs L. 2021. Relationships within Timmia, especially within T. austriaca Hedw. (Musci, Timmiaceae). Journal of Bryology. 43(3):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2021.1963914.
  • Hedenäs L. 2022. Potentially misleading phylogenetic signal and its explanation in single species studies – contrasting Loeskypnum badium, Sarmentypnum exannulatum and Warnstorfia fluitans. The Bryologist. 125(1):102–114. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-125.1.102.
  • Hedenäs L, Bennike O. 2008. A Plio-Pleistocene moss assemblage from Store Koldewey, NE Greenland. Lindbergia. 33(1):23–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27809535.
  • Hedenäs L, Bisang I. 2019. Are the remains of the Central European population of Drepanocladus turgescens genetically distinct from Scandinavian populations? Herzogia. 32(1):209–218. https://doi.org/10.13158/heia.32.1.2019.209.
  • Hedenäs L, Collart F, Heras P, Infante M, Kooijman A, Kučera J. 2022. Distributions and habitats of the two partly allopatric cryptic species of the vulnerable moss Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Bryophyta) in Europe. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 200(2):233–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boac011.
  • Hedenäs L, Eldenäs P. 2007. Cryptic speciation, habitat differentiation, and geography in Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 268:131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0529-y.
  • Hedenäs L, Eldenäs P. 2008. Relationships in Scorpidium (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta), especially between S. cossonii and S. scorpioides. Taxon. 57(1):121–130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25065953.
  • Hedenäs L, Heinrichs J, Gallego MT. 2019. The Scandinavian Syntrichia ruralis complex (Musci, Pottiaceae): a chaos of diversification. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 305:639–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-019-01596-0.
  • Hedenäs L, Larsson P, Cronholm B, Bisang I. 2021. Evidence of horizontal gene transfer between land plant plastids has surprising conservation implications. Annals of Botany. 127(7):903–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab021.
  • Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 23(2):254–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030.
  • Hutcheson K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 29(1):151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4.
  • Kolari THM, Korpelainen P, Kumpula T, Tahvanainen T. 2021. Accelerated vegetation succession but no hydrological change in a boreal fen during 20 years of recent climate change. Ecology and Evolution. 11(12):7602–7621. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7592.
  • Kooijman AM. 2012. ‘Poor rich fen mosses’: atmospheric N-deposition and P-eutrophication in base-rich fens. Lindbergia. 35:42–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/lindbergia.35.42.
  • Kooijman AM, Hedenäs L. 1991. Differentiation in habitat requirements within the genus Scorpidium, especially between S. revolvens and S. cossonii. Journal of Bryology. 16(4):619–627. https://doi.org/10.1179/jbr.1991.16.4.619.
  • Košnar J, Herbstová M, Kolář F, Koutecký P, Kučera J. 2012. A case study of intragenomic ITS variation in bryophytes: assessment of gene flow and role of polyploidy in the origin of European taxa of the Tortula muralis (Musci: Pottiaceae) complex. Taxon. 61(4):709–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.614001.
  • Kučera J, Kuznetsova OI, Manukjanová A, Ignatov MS. 2019. A phylogenetic revision of the genus Hypnum: towards completion. Taxon. 68(4):628–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12095.
  • Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M. 2006. How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? Journal of Ecology. 94(5):942–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01150.x.
  • Manukjanová A, Košnar J, Kučera J. 2020. Genetic variation in two cryptic species of the rare fen moss Hamatocaulis vernicosus in the Czech Republic. Preslia. 92(1):57–72. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2020.057.
  • Meleshko O, Martin MD, Korneliussen TS, Schröck C, Lamkowski P, Schmutz J, Healey A, Piatkowski BT, Shaw AJ, Weston DJ, et al. 2021. Extensive genome-wide phylogenetic discordance is due to incomplete lineage sorting and not ongoing introgression in a rapidly radiated bryophyte genus. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 38(7):2750–2766. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab063.
  • Mikulášková E, Veleba A, Šmerda J, Knoll A, Hájek M. 2017. Microsatellite variation in three calcium-tolerant species of peat moss detected specific genotypes of Sphagnum warnstorfii on magnesium-rich bedrock. Preslia. 89(2):101–114. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2017.101.
  • Müller K. 2005. SeqState. Applied Bioinformatics. 4:65–69. https://doi.org/10.2165/00822942-200504010-00008.
  • Natcheva R, Cronberg N. 2007. Recombination and introgression of nuclear and chloroplast genomes between the peat mosses, Sphagnum capillifolium and Sphagnum quinquefarium. Molecular Ecology. 16(4):811–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03163.x.
  • Naturvårdsverket. 2007. Myllrande våtmarker. Underlagsrapport till fördjupad utvärdering av miljömålsarbetet. Naturvårdsverket Rapport. 5771:1–132.
  • Naturvårdsverket. 2022. Bara naturlig försurning. Fördjupad utvärdering av miljömålen 2023. Naturvårdsverket Rapport. 7069:1–73.
  • Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6(1):288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x.
  • Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics. 28(19):2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
  • Ramírez-Soriano A, Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J, Calafell F, Navarro A. 2008. Statistical power analysis of neutrality tests under demographic expansions, contractions and bottlenecks with recombination. Genetics. 179(1):555–567. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.083006.
  • Schlesak S, Hedenäs L, Nebel M, Quandt D. 2018. Cleaning a taxonomic dustbin: placing the European Hypnum species in a phylogenetic context! Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution. 40(2):37–54. https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.40.2.3.
  • Shaw AJ, McDaniel SF, Werner O, Ros RM. 2002. New frontiers in bryology and lichenology. Phylogeography and phylodemography. The Bryologist. 105(3):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2002)105[0373:PAP]2.0.CO;2.
  • Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology. 49(2):369–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369.
  • Skrede I, Eidensen PB, Portela RP, Brochmann C. 2006. Refugia, differentiation and postglacial migration in arctic-alpine Eurasia, exemplified by the mountain avens (Dryas octopetala L.). Molecular Ecology. 15(7):1827–1840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02908.x.
  • Stenøien HK, Shaw AJ, Shaw B, Hassel K, Gunnarsson U. 2010. North American origin and recent European establishments of the Amphi-Atlantic peat moss Sphagnum angermanicum. Evolution. 65(4):1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01191.x.
  • Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 123(3):585–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/123.3.585.
  • Tyler T. 2002. Large-scale geographic patterns of genetic variation in Melica nutans, a widespread Eurasian woodland grass. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 236:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0235-8.