Multipolar Competition and the Rules-based Order: Probing the Limits of EU Foreign and Security Policy in the South China Sea

References

• Acharya, Amitav. 2018. The End of American World Order. Second Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcaro, Riccardo. 2018. The Liberal Order and its Contestations. A Conceptual Framework. The International Spectator 53 (1): 1-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaro, Riccardo, and Dijkstra, Hylke. 2024. Re-imagining EU Foreign and Security Policy in a Complex and Contested World. The International Spectator 59 (1): 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Roy. 2013. Russia, the West, and Military Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, Katerina. 2021. Europe Pivots to Indo-Pacific with ‘Multipolar’ Ambitions. Financial Times, 9 February. https://www.ft.com/content/408e1244-bc27-47f2-bdfc-20bf328e4114.
   Google Scholar
• Beinart, Peter. 2021. The Vacuous Phrase at the Core of Biden's Foreign Policy. The New York Times, 22 June. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/22/opinion/biden-foreign-policy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkevold, Jo Inge. 2023. Why China Is Not a Superpower. Foreign Policy, 2 March. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/02/china-superpower-us-new-cold-war-rivalry-geopolitics/.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Max, and Besch, Sophia. 2023. Why European Defense Still Depends on America. Foreign Affairs, 7 March. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/why-european-defense-still-depends-america.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, Sven. 2023. EU-China: We Have to Talk About (Not Macron But) Strategy. Egmont, 24 April. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/eu-china-we-have-to-talk-about-not-macron-but-strategy/.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C. 2023. The Myth of Multipolarity: American Power’s Staying Power. Foreign Affairs, 18 April. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/china-multipolarity-myth.
   Google Scholar
• Brzozowski, Alexandra. 2023. Von der Leyen Wants ‘De-risking’ not ‘De-coupling’ in New China Doctrine. EURACTIV, 30 March. https://www.euractiv.com/section/eu-china/news/von-der-leyen-wants-de-risking-not-de-coupling-in-new-china-doctrine/.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Third Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry. 2012. How Regions Were Made, and the Legacies for World Politics: An English School Reconnaissance. In Thazha V. Paul, ed. International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation: 22-47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Steve, Hu, Weixing, and He, Kai. 2019. Discerning States’ Revisionist and Status-quo Orientations: Comparing China and the US. European Journal of International Relations 25 (2): 613-40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Ian. 2011. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Zack, and Sayers, Eric. 2023. Japan’s Shift to War Footing. War on the Rocks, 12 January. https://warontherocks.com/2023/01/japans-shift-to-war-footing/.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2016. Declaration by the High Representative on Behalf of the EU on Recent Developments in the South China Sea. 11 March. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/11/hr-declaration-on-bealf-of-eu-recent-developments-south-china-sea/.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2022. ASEAN and the EU Sign the World’s First Bloc-to-bloc Air Transport Agreement – Joint Press Release. 17 October. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/10/17/asean-and-the-eu-sign-the-world-s-first-bloc-to-bloc-air-transport-agreement-joint-press-release/.
   Google Scholar
• CRIMARIO. 2023. Critical Maritime Routes Indo-Pacific Project. February. https://fpi.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-08/220217%20Factsheet%20CI%20CRIMARIO.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dandashly, Assem, Dijkstra, Hylke, Marafona, Marta, Noutcheva, Gergana, and Paikin, Zachary. 2021. Multipolarity and EU Foreign and Security Policy: Divergent Approaches to Conflict and Crisis Response. JOINT Research Papers No. 6, December. https://www.jointproject.eu/2021/12/06/multipolarity-and-eu-foreign-and-security-policy-divergent-approaches-to-conflict-and-crisis-response/.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi, Rush. 2021. The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Anthony, and Leonard, Mark. 2018. Can Europe Save the World Order? European Council on Foreign Relations, 24 May. https://ecfr.eu/publication/can_europe_save_the_world_order/.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS (European External Action Service). 2021. The EU Approach to the Indo-Pacific: Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Jakarta. 3 June. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/99501.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2023. Questions and Answers on the EU Maritime Security Strategy, 10 March. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_23_1482.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and HRVP (High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy). 2021. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. The EU strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. JOIN(2021) 24, 16 September. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/jointcommunication_2021_24_1_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2022. EU-ASEAN Commemorative Summit - Joint Leaders’ Statement. 16014/22, 14 December. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/12/14/eu-asean-commemorative-summit-joint-leaders-statement-14-december-2022/.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, Evan. 2022. The U.S. and the Indo-Pacific Region. The Institute for Peace & Diplomacy, 18 November. https://peacediplomacy.org/2022/11/18/evan-feigenbaum-the-u-s-and-the-indo-pacific-region/.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, Evan, and Szubin, Adam. 2023. What China Has Learned from the Ukraine War. Foreign Affairs, 14 February. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/what-china-has-learned-ukraine-war.
   Google Scholar
• Gabuev, Alexander. 2023. Russia’s Reliance on China will Outlast Vladimir Putin, Says Alexander Gabuev. The Economist, 18 March. https://www.economist.com/russias-reliance-on-china-will-persist-even-after-vladimir-putin-is-gone-says-alexander-gabuev.
   Google Scholar
• Garton Ash, Timothy, Krastev, Ivan, and Leonard, Mark. 2023. United West, Divided from the Rest: Global Public Opinion One Year into Russia’s War on Ukraine. European Council on Foreign Relations, 24 February. https://ecfr.eu/podcasts/episode/united-west-divided-from-the-rest-global-public-opinion-one-year-into-russias-war-on-ukraine/.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, Evelyn. 2014. East Asia as Regional International Society: The Problem of Great Power Management. In Barry Buzan and Yongjin Zhang, eds. Contesting International Society in East Asia: 167-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gowan, Richard. 2022. Old Bull, New China Shop: The Institution of Diplomacy and the Sino-American Struggle for Influence at the UN. In Trine Flockhart and Zachary Paikin, eds. Rebooting Global International Society: Change, Contestation and Resilience: 199-214. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haass, Richard. 2018. What Happens When a World Order Ends. Foreign Affairs, 11 December. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/how-world-order-ends.
   Google Scholar
• Heer, Paul. 2021. Why the ‘Longer Telegram’ Won’t Solve the China Challenge. The National Interest, 1 February. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-%E2%80%98longer-telegram%E2%80%99-won%E2%80%99t-solve-china-challenge-177404.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, William H. 2018. No Place for Russia: European Security Institutions Since 1989. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, William H. 2019. Russia’s Search for a Place in Europe. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 61 (3): 93-101.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Van. 2023. The Problem with Primacy: America’s Dangerous Quest to Dominate the Pacific. Foreign Affairs, 16 January. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/asia/problem-primacy.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarski, Marcin. 2019. Convergence or Divergence? Visions of World Order and the Russian-Chinese Relationship. European Politics and Society 20 (2): 207-24.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, Robert. 2013. The World America Made. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Robert D. 2011. Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kausikan, Bilahari. 2021. Southeast Asia in the Age of Great-Power Rivalry. Foreign Affairs, 16 February. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2021-02-16/arena.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, Vincent Charles, and Theussen, Amelie. 2022. Cum Haereticis Fides Non Servanda: International Law’s Resilience in a Pluralistic World? In Trine Flockhart and Zachary Paikin, eds. Rebooting Global International Society: Change, Contestation and Resilience: 215-36. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, Parag. 2019. China Couldn’t Dominate Asia if It Wanted to. Foreign Policy, 3 February. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/02/03/china-couldnt-dominate-asia-if-it-wanted-to/.
   Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, Elena A., and Flockhart, Trine. 2020. Resilience in EU and International Institutions: Redefining Local Ownership in a New Global Governance Agenda. Contemporary Security Policy 41 (2): 153-75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Stuart. 2023. Send Warships to Taiwan Strait, Borrell Urges EU Governments. Politico, 23 April. https://www.politico.eu/article/china-joseb-taiwan-borrell-eu-warships-to-patrol-strait/.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, Richard Ned. 2018. The Rise and Fall of Political Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Mark. 2020. Geopolitical Europe in Times of Covid-19. Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), June-July. https://www.iwm.at/blog/geopolitical-europe-in-times-of-covid-19.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Richard. 2009. Revisiting Realism and the Balance of Power. In Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison and Patrick James, eds. Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation: 21-44. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Bobo. 2015. Russia and the New World Disorder. Baltimore (MD): Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, Alexander. 2018. Russia and China: The New Rapprochement. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mahbubani, Kishore. 2021. Can America Lose to China? The National Interest, 1 July. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/can-america-lose-china-189020.
   Google Scholar
• Mahbubani, Kishore. 2023. How Asia Keeps the Peace. Project Syndicate, 12 June. https://www.project-syndicate.org/magazine/asia-unlike-europe-no-major-wars-since-end-of-cold-war-by-kishore-mahbubani-2023-06.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, Walter Russell. 2020. The End of the Wilsonian Era. Foreign Affairs, 8 December. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-12-08/end-wilsonian-era.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the CR (Czech Republic). 2023. The Government has Approved Czechia´s Strategies for Engaging in Africa and for Cooperation with the Indo-Pacific. 4 January. https://www.mzv.cz/jnp/en/issues_and_press/press_releases/the_government_has_approved_czechia_s.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC. 2021. Position Paper on China’s Cooperation with the United Nations. 22 October. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/wjzcs/202110/t20211022_9609380.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC. 2023. China’s Position on the Political Settlement of the Ukraine Crisis. 24 February. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202302/t20230224_11030713.html.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, Nuno. 2021. World Order across the End of the Cold War. In Nuno P. Monteiro and Fritz Bartel, eds. Before and After the Fall: World Politics and the End of the Cold War: 338-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Thomas G. 2005. Chinese Foreign Policy in the Age of Globalization. In Yong Deng and Fei Ling Wang, eds. China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy: 121-58. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Michael Cotey. 2018. The Final Act: The Helsinki Accords and the Transformation of the Cold War. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). 2022. NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. 29 June, Madrid. https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE (Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe). 1990. Charter of Paris for a New Europe. 21 November, Paris. https://www.osce.org/mc/39516.
   Google Scholar
• Paikin, Zachary. 2021. Great Power Rivalry and the Weakening of Collective Hegemony: Revisiting the Relationship between International Society and International Order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 34 (1): 22-45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paikin, Zachary. 2022. Contestation in Global International Society. In Trine Flockhart and Zachary Paikin, eds. Rebooting Global International Society: Change, Contestation and Resilience: 41-57. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Paikin, Zachary, Kembara, Gilang, Mantong, Andrew, and Blockmans, Steven. 2023. The South China Sea and Indo-Pacific in an Era of “Multipolar” Competition: A More Targeted EU Response? JOINT Research Papers No. 14, February. https://www.jointproject.eu/2023/02/03/the-south-china-sea-and-indo-pacific-in-an-era-of-multipolar-competition-a-more-targeted-eu-response/.
   Google Scholar
• Paikin, Zachary, Toygür, Ilke, Quencez, Martin, and Nagy, Stephen R. 2022. The Rise of Mega-Regions Eurasia, the Indo-Pacific, and the Transatlantic Alliance in a Reshaped World Order. Centre for European Policy Studies, 1 December. https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/the-rise-of-mega-regions/.
   Google Scholar
• Pajon, Céline. 2022. A Green-Blue Alliance in Motion: Pacific Island Countries and Europe Fighting Climate Change. Ifri, October. https://www.ifri.org/en/publications/briefings-de-lifri/green-blue-alliance-motion-pacific-island-countries-and-europe.
   Google Scholar
• Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2019. Managing the Rise of Southeast Asia’s Coast Guards. Wilson Center, February. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/managing-the-risesoutheast-asias-coast-guards.
   Google Scholar
• Pugliese, Giulio. 2023. The European Union’s Security Intervention in the Indo-Pacific: Between Multilateralism and Mercantile Interests. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 17 (1): 76-98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raik, Kristi, Blockmans, Steven, Dandashly, Assem, Noutcheva, Gergana, Osypchuk, Anna, and Suslov, Anton. 2023. Tackling the Constraints on EU Foreign Policy towards Ukraine: From Strategic Denial to Geopolitical Awakening. JOINT Research Papers No. 20, April. https://www.jointproject.eu/2023/04/06/tackling-the-constraints-on-eu-foreign-policy-towards-ukraine-from-strategic-denial-to-geopolitical-awakening/.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Jeffrey. 2020. Canada and the Indo-Pacific: “Diverse” and “Inclusive”, Not “Free” and “Open”. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, September. https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/canada-and-indo-pacific-asia-pacific-foundation-canada.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian, and Dunne, Tim. 2017. The Globalization of International Society. In T. Dunne and C. Reus-Smit, eds. The Globalization of International Society: 18-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieker, Pernille, and Giske, Mathilde Tomine Eriksdatter. 2021. Conceptualising the Multi-Actor Character of EU(rope)’s Foreign Policy. JOINT Research Papers No.2, October. https://www.jointproject.eu/2021/10/06/conceptualising-the-multi-actor-character-of-europes-foreign-policy/.
   Google Scholar
• Rozman, Gilbert. 2014. The Sino-Russian Challenge to the World Order: National Identities, Bilateral Relations, and East vs. West in the 2010s. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, Richard. 2017. Russia Against the Rest: The Post-Cold War Crisis of World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, Richard. 2023. What Role for Russia in a Multipolar World? In Aldo Ferrari and Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti, eds. Multipolarity After Ukraine: Old Wine in New Bottles?: 29-47. Milan: Ledizioni LediPublishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, David. 2013. China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Tori. 2022. Success Unlikely in Indo-Pacific Economic Framework Without New Market Access. American Action Forum, 2 June. https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/success-unlikely-in-indo-pacific-economic-framework-without-new-market-access/.
   Google Scholar
• Strangio, Sebastian. 2023. China, ASEAN to “Accelerate Consultations” on South China Sea Code. The Diplomat, 23 February. https://thediplomat.com/2023/02/china-asean-to-accelerate-consultations-on-south-china-sea-code/.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, Richard. 2018. Order and Contestation in the Asia-Pacific Region: Liberal vs Developmental/Non-interventionist Approaches. The International Spectator 53 (1): 138-51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Jake, and Brands, Hal. 2020. China has Two Paths to Global Domination. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 22 May. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/05/22/china-has-two-paths-to-global-domination-pub-81908.
   Google Scholar
• Teleanu, Sorina. 2021. The Geopolitics of Digital Standards: China’s Role in Standard-setting Organisations. DiploFoundation/Geneva Internet Platform and Multilateral Dialogue Konrad Adenauer Foundation Geneva, December. https://www.diplomacy.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Geopolitics-of-digital-standards-Dec-2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, Nathalie. 2018. The Demise of the International Liberal Order and the Future of the European Project. Istituto Affari Internazionali, 19 November. https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/demise-international-liberal-order-and-future-european-project.
   Google Scholar
• Tønnesson, Stein. 2008. An International History of the Dispute in the South China Sea. In Geoff Wade, ed. China and Southeast Asia: Volume 6: the People’s Republic of China and Southeast Asia: 337-62. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tunsjø, Øystein. 2018. The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics: China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Adam. 2006. Hegemony & History. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy Is what States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391-425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, Jake. 2023. What Biden Means when He Says We’re Fighting ‘Global Battle for Democracy’. Responsible Statecraft, 31 March. https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/03/31/what-biden-means-when-he-says-were-fighting-global-battle-for-democracy/.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheim, Stephen. 2023. Iraq and the Pathologies of Primacy. Foreign Affairs, 17 March. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/iraq-and-pathologies-primacy.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hugh. 2013. The China Choice: Why We Should Share Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yongjin. 1999. China in International Society Since 1949: Alienation and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar